Our exclusive interview with Linus Torvalds

Linus Torvalds has probably done more for the world than many know, and his influence stretches far and wide throughout all corners of the globe with a variety of amazing implementations of his original vision that started almost two decades ago.

Whether you know it or not, at some stage in your day-to-day life you probably come into contact with Torvalds’ work. Without him, many wouldn’t be where they are today, Ubuntu wouldn’t exist, and Free Software wouldn’t be such a prevalent mainstream ideology used by millions of people.

Torvalds has paved the way for Linux to become a truly successful mass-market product that’s ubiquitous in everything from embedded ARM devices like in-car entertainment systems to the likes of the TiVo set-top box that graces living rooms the world over and possibly even the smartphone that resides in your pocket.

His early work to establish the Linux kernel as a reliable, feature-rich and flexible basis for Operating Systems made Linux one of the most prominent and widely used examples of Free Software in the world.

Torvalds has been named as one of the “most influential people in the world” by TIME Magazine in 2004, and was voted 17th in their “Top 100 Most Important People of the Century” in 2000.

Torvalds has won numerous awards including the EFF Pioneer Award, the Lovelace Medal and the Takeda Award and in 2008 he was inducted into the Hall of Fellows of the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California.

I had the honour of meeting Linus when he appeared at Linux.conf.au 2011 in Brisbane this week, and after chatting to him for quite some time I must say that this man is a lovely, amicable and approachable person who is truly passionate about what he does.

Linus is humble although what he has done has affected the day-to-day lives of millions, he is friendly and approachable although his position makes him a target for potentially annoying fanboys and media to swoon after and his insight into the world of Open Source is something that I believe should be truly valued.

On Ubuntu

In its 6 year existence, Ubuntu has delivered 13 releases into the hands of millions of users, a number which continues to grow every day. It has been fundamental in helping lower the barrier to entry for Linux and has brought many more people into the Free Software world, myself being one of these people.

So naturally, I asked what Linus thought about Ubuntu, and the first thing he said was that he is not an Ubuntu user.

“I’ve tried it a couple of times over the years, mainly because the thing Ubuntu did so well was make Debian usable. I always felt that Debian was a pointless exercise because to me, the point of a distribution is to make everything easy. Easy to install, to be pretty and to be friendly and Ubuntu did that to Debian.”

[...] the thing Ubuntu did so well was make Debian usable.

“I’ve always had a few problems [with Ubuntu.] It’s not very friendly to kernel developers, and I just end up giving up. That’s kind of okay, because clearly I am not the target audience.”

“I think that Ubuntu has done a really, really good job making Linux available to a wider and different audience, the kind of audience that comes from a Windows and Apple background.”

I think that Ubuntu has done a really, really good job making Linux available to a wider and different audience.

I explained to Linus that certainly that was the case with myself, as I only got involved with Linux a couple of years ago and if Ubuntu wasn’t around I don’t think I would have had the guts to give Linux a go.

“Even from a technical angle, I love the fact how Ubuntu was basically the distribution that started the whole Live CD install. While you’re installing [Ubuntu] you can actually use the program. You can actually do something while it’s installing and I thought, why didn’t everybody else do this?”

On Linux in mobile devices

Linux on mobile devices has come a long way in the past two years, mainly helped along by the massive force that is the Android Operating System by Google.

Suddenly, Linux is actually being used by a huge number of people around the world and with over 300,000 Android phones being sold a day, as well as other Linux based platforms such as Nokia’s Meego starting to take shape, this doesn’t look like it’s going to change anytime soon and indeed it will only get more popular.

I suggested to Linus that it must be really pleasing for him to see Linux in the hands of hundreds of thousands of people every day.

“Not just Android. What I’ve found that has been most fun for me has been when people are using Linux in ways that I don’t use it or in ways that I never intended it to be used, people using it in embedded areas, and with cellphones like Android but also all the crazy people using it in printers and TVs.”

“I am very happy about Android obviously. I use Android, and it’s actually made cellphones very usable.”

“In fact, long before cellphones became more usable there were all these failed prototypes that tried to use Linux and that was a lot of fun to see too. It’s a learning experience.”

I am very happy about Android obviously. I use Android, and it’s actually made cellphones very usable.

At that point we had to catch our bus from the conference venue to the Brisbane Cultural Centre where the Penguin Dinner was to be held.

I got to have a nice informal chat with Linus off-record during the bus ride, about everything from Australian public transport to where he had been diving that morning (one of Linus’ hobbies is SCUBA diving).

Eventually we got to the Cultural Centre and found a quiet place to continue the interview, where I had one last question to ask Linus.

Upcoming kernel features

The kernel is Linus’ domain, so I figured I better ask him what cool new stuff is happening in the next 6 months of kernel development.

“The current merge window that closed only a week before I left for the conference is my personal favourite merge window in a long time because we have two really big things going on.”

“We have the new filename lookup code. The neat thing about that is that it should be completely invisible to users in the sense that we don’t add in new features, we don’t do anything that people notice except we’re doing it much faster.”

[...] we’re doing it much faster.

“We were very good at file lookup before too because it’s a very common operation. Even when you’re using a graphical desktop and you don’t think about your workload as being filesystem specific, quite often every time you open a new graphical application they tend to open ten thousand different configuration files.”

“Sometimes it’s a disgrace what those processes are doing behind your back, and making that very fundamental kernel operation faster is something that I get involved in and I think the kernel should do really, really well.”

Sometimes it’s a disgrace what those processes are doing behind your back.

“At the same time it’s kind of the less glamorous side of the kernel. People tend to talk up new features and how we do something really cool that nobody has ever done before. The fact is in the end the really important stuff is the meat and potatoes – doing the boring stuff, the stuff that really matters.”

“Too many merge windows have fancy features. New drivers are something that everybody wants and needs and there is new hardware coming out and we need to support it, but at the same time new drivers tend to not be something fundamentally exciting, that’s the other side of the meat and potatoes, you need to do it because you need to support the hardware but it’s not the kind of stuff I personally find exciting.”

At this stage I asked Linus whether the kernel was going to continue getting faster as the kernel team work on optimization.

“I hope so, quite often the kernel doesn’t get faster. We add new features and as a result the kernel gets bigger and slower. The fact that we get noticeably faster on some really important operations is a great thing.”

I suggested to Linus that unlike other Operating Systems such as Windows, Linux tends to not suffer from the same level of bloat as time goes on.

“We have bloat, it comes up in a lot of benchmarks and a lot of people do benchmarking of how kernel performance improves over time, but we do have bloat and it happens.”

Almost always there is a really good reason for the bloat.

“Almost always there is a really good reason for the bloat. For example, we add in something because we want people to do new things but it does often end up meaning that we have a bigger footprint. Sometimes we add stuff that really speed things up so that it makes up for all the bad things!”

“Computers are getting faster and in the last three years we have improved scalability a lot. It used to be that having four CPUs or eight CPUs you were talking about server systems and relatively few people using them.”

“What’s happening now is that we’ve done a lot of scalability for those people and you can now buy a laptop with four CPUs or eight CPUs and it’s not even that expensive.”

Thanks a lot to Linus for taking the time out of his incredibly busy schedule to talk to me, I really enjoyed it and I hope you guys enjoyed reading it!

Linus and I at LCA 2011

Related posts:

  1. Days 3 and 4 of #LCA2011; rockets, balloons, Linus Torvalds
  2. #LCA2011 Interview: ex-Canonical Jeff Waugh talks beginnings of Ubuntu; Unity, GNOME
  3. Exclusive interview with Ubuntu Unity’s Technical Lead Neil Patel
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • Anonymous

    Wow!

  • http://twitter.com/usemeego meegouser

    What a Scoop! I’m jealous :D

  • http://dottorblaster.it/ Bl@ster

    WOWOWOW :D

  • http://openid-provider.appspot.com/souobadaro Red_Acid

    Great interview, Benjamin. I’m sure it was awesome to meet the almighty creator of Linux. =D

    And thank you for everything, Linus! You rock! =D

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FUL7WV2GJLQ3F7FHQKZOIS7OE4 Moraru

      I fkn Respect Linus Torvalds!

  • Anonymous

    Good!!!

  • Anonymous

    best interview i read in a good while!

  • http://twitter.com/tommisas tommi saira

    Torvalds is on sechxy beast.

  • http://twitter.com/Tahakki Joel Auterson

    All kudos to Linus for coming up with the kernel we all know and love, but I read his blog once. He’s a complete jerk.

    Still love ‘im though. :P

    • http://openid-provider.appspot.com/hushnecampus Sam Illingworth

      Ooooh scandelous gossip! What’d he say that was jerky? Tell us tell us tell us!

      • Anonymous

        Oh, several rather nasty posts attacking other people’s beliefs, mostly anti-religion. It’s his blog, of course, he has the right to post whatever he likes.

        • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

          citation needed, also respect is earned.

        • Anonymous

          I have no idea what you are talking about. I scanned a few pages of his blog and the closest thing I could find was a post saying ‘bacon is delicious’ – which it is!

      • Anonymous

        Oh, several rather nasty posts attacking other people’s beliefs, mostly anti-religion. It’s his blog, of course, he has the right to post whatever he likes.

    • https://launchpad.net/~david4dev david4dev

      He’s not a jerk, he’s a git :)

      • Anonymous

        If that’s supposed to be a pun, it’s rather good. I congratulate you. :P

        • http://twitter.com/CaptainShanks Christian Mello

          He wrote git and there’s a reason he gave it that name ;D

    • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

      Linus is.. opinionated. He does justify his positions well and the result is hard to argue with, the kernel is clean, largely correct and continues to evolve.

  • Anonymous

    I love you Linus! You are my hero! ;-)

  • http://kbhaskar.in/ Bhaskar Kandiyal

    Awesome! :D

  • http://twitter.com/gslhr Alexander Preisinger

    OMG! Ubuntu! Interview with Linus Torvalds

  • molok

    Nice interview. By the way, it makes no sense to repeat the important phrases using a bigger font. It makes sense on newspaper because people could be skimming through the pages, but here I’m already reading the article, why would I read the same sentence twice?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QUDJDKRBRQ7NTHD5656EM5TJT4 忍Kido忍

      Well to be honest…it’s kind of helpful because I read over half of the interview, then I just scrolled down and wanted to read important things such as kernel developing and important hints for the future that Linus might give us. So making big the important phrases makes it much easier for people like me to find those important hints. Thanks!

      P.D.
      Im so healous right now too!! I would do anything to meet someone like him with such great heart.!

      • molok

        They could have used a bold font for questions

        • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

          We normally do that when doing interviews, however this format Ben has picked to publish this in does not actually list the questions just the answers.

          It’s more like.. minutes of a meeting I guess

          • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

            The reason it doesn’t list the questions/prompts is because there were only four.

            “So naturally, I asked what Linus thought about Ubuntu…”

            “I suggested to Linus that it must be really pleasing for him to see Linux in the hands of hundreds of thousands of people every day.”

            “The kernel is Linus’ domain, so I figured I better ask him what cool new stuff is happening in the next 6 months of kernel development.”

            “At this stage I asked Linus whether the kernel was going to continue getting faster as the kernel team work on optimization.”

            When you’re interviewing someone like Linus, it would be foolish to have precise questions ready to ask him. I had a general idea of what I wanted to ask him about that would be suitable for our readers (Ubuntu, Mobile Linux and kernel features that will affect Ubuntu).

            Other than that, other questions are shaped as the interview progresses – for example, the entire discussion at the end about bloat/optimization was never something I originally planned to ask Linus, but was a natural consequence of him talking about the filesystem structure – something I never knew he was going to talk about.

            Physical conversations between two humans play out differently to say, an email or IRC interview where the questions and responses are very direct and specific and you get a nice cut between topics.

            The way this article is written is meant to keep some of that “flow” that you get in an actual real conversation with someone.

      • http://omegax.mp/ Timothy Kross

        Another thing that bothers me is that they do not end their quotations. It gets to me every time.

        • http://twitter.com/gymjbstu Greg

          End quotations aren’t used at the end of a paragraph if the quotation continues on into the next paragraph, however, start quotations are still used at the start of the new paragraph. Comme ca.

          “Blah blah blah. Blah Blah Blah.

          “Blah blah blah….

        • http://twitter.com/gymjbstu Greg

          Nevermind, after looking over the article again I see that this isn’t what you were talking about.

      • Anonymous

        I like the style too. Much easier to read.

        But -999 on the attitude. :-)

    • Anonymous

      it’s easier on the eyes that way – walls of text are never nice to read.

      • Anonymous

        I disagree. It’s incredibly visually distracting and takes me out of the flow of the interview. Maybe they could have an option—”Readers” v “Skimmers?”

        anyway, great interview though! And thanks linus!

    • https://launchpad.net/~navneethc Navneeth

      Agreed, liked; and, yeah, it’s sort of silly to read the same sentence/phrase twice almost consecutively.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      They’re there to highlight important quotes in sections for people simply skimming, and to break up large sections of small text.

      I find it works quite well and if you don’t want to read the big text, it’s not that hard to simply jump your eyes past it as the font size difference between the regular vs. popout is large, therefore they contrast very well.

      Either way, it’s our style – I could choose to have no rationale but in the end, I came to Brisbane, I got the interview with Linus, I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.

      • http://omegax.mp/ Timothy Kross

        Excuse me my lord, is the point of a comment section not to get feedback/discussion? Should we also stop pointing out spelling mistakes? Because as you said “I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.”?

        • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

          Sure, the comment section is great for feedback and most of it we listen to, certainly with regards to spelling mistakes and factual errors which are corrected very swiftly.

          What we aren’t looking for is feedback on our style, that’s something that we have developed and what makes us unique – we get to decide what style our site has.

          The readers do influence the content and the style as you’d expect, but usually indirectly as we examine trends.

          • Anonymous

            “I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.”

            Douche move right there.

          • Anonymous

            “I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.”

            Douche move right there.

          • Marie

            “I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.”

            Sounds like Canonical’s new philosophy about Ubuntu as well. There was a day when Ubuntu was community-based — I’m afraid those days may be behind us now.

          • http://twitter.com/davbren David Gross

            It’s not a Douche move at all. Why should anyone be able to tell him how to run his own website? By all means critique the article, that’s what the comments are for. But blimey, if you don’t like the site, why are you here??

          • http://twitter.com/davbren David Gross

            It’s not a Douche move at all. Why should anyone be able to tell him how to run his own website? By all means critique the article, that’s what the comments are for. But blimey, if you don’t like the site, why are you here??

          • http://www.martinsmucker.com Michael Martin-Smucker

            Indeed, with the exception of this high-profile article, I’ve basically stopped reading Benjamin’s because his writing seems to have a “better-than-thou” attitude and he usually ends up making one or two defensive, douchy remarks in the comment section afterwards.

          • http://twitter.com/ButlerPCnet Michael Butler

            u mad? lol

          • Miggs

            Although I have no problems with Benjamin’s writing style his rudeness disappoints me. That’s no way to treat the “customers” (readers) of this article.

          • Anonymous

            “I own the blog and I wrote the article. So I can do what I like.”

            Douche move right there.

          • http://twitter.com/conscioususer Conscious User

            Remaining faithful to your developed style should not imply ignoring feedback on it, unless your style guidelines are remarkably tight and you believe you’ve already reached the pinnacle of refinement.

            If you asked all readers for stylistic suggestions, I’m willing to bet that a substantial amount of them would not really affect your style principles and would be more in the direction of small refinement.

          • Anonymous

            Congratulations on meeting Linus, I knew you wanted to.

            But face-palm on the attitude problem. These people are your readers Benjamin, you should treat them with as much fake respect as you can possibly act.

          • http://www.martinsmucker.com Michael Martin-Smucker

            “we’re doing it much faster.
            [...] WE’RE DOING IT MUCH FASTER.”

            It looks amateur and it’s annoying to read. And why would you post such an arrogant, defensive comment in response to an opinion that a lot of your readers obviously agree with?

          • http://twitter.com/donavoncade Donavon

            It is amateur. So was this:
            “Linus is humble although what he has done has affected the day-to-day lives of millions, he is friendly and approachable although his position makes him a target for potentially annoying fanboys and media to swoon after and his insight into the world of Open Source is something that I believe should be truly valued.”

            One of the most poorly constructed sentences I’ve ever read in an article.

        • http://www.thekiplingconspiracy.co.uk christiegrinham

          He just explained his point of view :S He is not being all high and mighty.

          • http://lenindcruz.deviantart.com Lenin D

            he explained his view in a manner which showed he doesn’t need feedback.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2K2IAYJGMPN2LWDAYIG6WSAD3M Toki

        You should tone down the size of the quotes. In some of the older articles there are large one paragraph quotes in the same style, and it’s really annoying scrolling through them.

        Either that, or make a new quote style. Thanks for taking my suggestion into consideration.

      • http://twitter.com/rainbowcatfuck AMD

        Went from polite conversation (First sentence) to attitude problem (Last paragraph)

        If you don’t want people critiquing your work do it right first time. It’s constructive, if your style is irritating then you change it. Sticking fast to something your readers dislike gains you nothing.

      • Anonymous

        I enjoyed reading the article and I think you made good use of the time you had to meet linus, cheers for the read. I like the quotes I definitely read the net like a magazine.

        “So I can do what I like”

        I suggest you shouldn’t respond in such a defensive manner as it will just provoke a defensive or hostile reaction. You are working in a creative field and there will always be statements and people you don’t agree with. I don’t see why molok is so out of place he was just providing with his perspective on your design, don’t expect everyone to sugar coat their views. You don’t have to remind them that you don’t have to change as that is obvious, unessicary and as good as stfu.

      • Keith Watt

        You get the feedback whether you like it or not, that’s life. 

        What a whiny baby response, “..I can do what I like”. What are you, 15?

    • Anonymous

      Try installing the Stylish add-on for Firefox (I won’t post a link, they get moderated).

      You can then use the stylish code I wrote by viewing the scripts available for omgubuntu on the stylish website. The script is called “fix quirks on omgubuntu”. It removes a few other visual bugs as well. :-)

    • Keith Watt

      I agree, I think it’s pretty silly to put the same sentence again but with a bigger font. I think it’s an amateur style effect. At least list them on the side or something so the reader doesn’t have to read it twice. 

  • http://www.erickjohncuevas.com erickjohncuevas

    The man behind the Linux Kernel..

  • Anonymous

    Nice article Ben, well done.

  • http://twitter.com/ctown_myth Ashish Kansara

    …he’s bigger than I imagined… *runs*

  • Anonymous

    I read Linus’ comments about Debian a few years ago, I am surprised he still underrates this fine distro so much.

    • http://bigbrovar.aoizora.org/ bigbrovar

      Considering he was once quoted as calling bsd developers “Bunch of masturbating monkeys” I think the view he expressed about debian is a compliment by comparsm

      • Anonymous

        Before Ubuntu 10.10 had the Name “Maverick Meerkat”, Linus proposed Ubuntu should use the name Masturbating Monkey.

        • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

          citation needed

        • Anonymous

          it was not linus.

      • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

        The OpenBSD developers specifically and he has always had issue with elevating security to the point of godlike worship the OpenBSD crowd does. He has a history of fixing security issues without even noting that the fix removes a security problem, to him it is just another bug. Also to be fair the OpenBSD crowd have been rather hard to work with, there is the whole “stolen wifi driver code” episode which personally I felt was an all-time low for mankind as a whole.

        http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/706950

    • http://bigbrovar.aoizora.org/ bigbrovar

      Considering he was once quoted as calling bsd developers “Bunch of masturbating monkeys” I think the view he expressed about debian is a compliment by comparsm

    • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

      Most of his complaints are still valid.

      It’s hard to install compared to any major offering and has not evolved sufficiently compared other offerings. It also still makes use of the extremely impractical manual configuration during installation of many packages which is entirely a no-no when providing a distro to the common man.

      It has it’s own weird ecosystem which is not used outside of Debian. Having to relearn skills from one Linux just to have them apply to the way Debian thinks the world should work is enough to make grown men weep and ask why.

      It’s still focused on providing ever more breakage in the name of “protecting” freedom (e.g. they just proudly announced as a feature that they ripped out support for a number of devices in the name of freedom because the firmware didn’t come with source code in any form they were happy with). The problem here being, that users like having their hardware work and that Debian seldomly (if ever) has a plan for how to replace this kind of functionality, they just rip it out which is childish at best.

      Their mailing lists are famous for being hopeless pits of flaming.

      They are just not geared at all towards creating the “just works” Linux which Linus has argued for in the past. In fact in many areas Debian is by policy the anti-thesis of this, over encumbered by choice and management ideals which go directly against “just working”.

  • Anonymous

    If i were in front of Linus i’m sure i could only think: OMG! What a brain in that head!

  • Anonymous

    You missed out the most important question of all though, how HE pronounces linux.

    Nobody will have asked that before and you missed it :(

    • Anonymous

      it’s [linuks]. Not that hard. [lainuks] and [leenuks] are some odd Anglisized pronounciations.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LOR655GR4ZFHCMSV7FW5ROPSAA Cliff W

        No, it’s “leenuks”, if you are to take “Leenus” pronunciation. Like you, I say “lih-nucks”, but that is the odd Anglicized form. As was pointed out elsewhere, distros used to ship with a sound file of Linus pronouncing it, so it’s not really arguable.

        • Anonymous

          Thank you but you’re wrong. I happen to be a Swedish-speaking Finn(guess who else is), so I really do know how it’s supposed to be pronounced.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LOR655GR4ZFHCMSV7FW5ROPSAA Cliff W

            http://www.paul.sladen.org/pronunciation/torvalds-says-linux.mp3

            To me that sounds more like “lee-nux” than “lih-nux”, although I’d be willing to say that there’s probably no exact Anglicisation of that pronunciation (and the recording isn’t that great).

        • Anonymous

          Thank you but you’re wrong. I happen to be a Swedish-speaking Finn(guess who else is), so I really do know how it’s supposed to be pronounced.

    • http://twitter.com/maluka Mustafa Maluka
    • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

      years ago, I recall configuring my sound card and the test app was basically playing a file of Linus pronouncing Linux.

      The best example though was given by maddog at a conference once where they were holding a kind of “nerds v. geeks” panel and he ran through all the ways Linus could pronounce Linux depending on what country he was in. I know there is video of this but I cannot for my life find it right now.

      • Akshat Jain

        *want_that_app*

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      He says “Lin-ucks.”

  • http://dylanmccall.blogspot.com/ dylan-m

    Great! Thank you, Benjamin. Nice interview :)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QGUOKPDPIPMOPJK7RCCXIALHRI Ene Dene

    Always good to hear what The Boss has to say.
    Only, I think that he last time tried Debian 10 years ago. Ubuntu is easier but Debian is not that complicated.

  • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

    Now that we have a lovely little interview where Linus says Android is linux, I’d really love it if Canonical employees would stop trying to cast Android as not linux in their efforts to talk up Ubuntu as a competing platform for new device form factors.

    Its sneaking into the strategic messaging certain people are doing and its really going to be a problem moving forward for Canonical if this strategic messaging meme proliferates inside their fenceline and infects all their public facing talking points. It send a confusing message to potential OEM customers and developers. Especially when linaro is gearing up to support Android as a target.

    -jef

    • http://twitter.com/usemeego meegouser

      -Android is nice but it only uses the kernel. All apps run inside a Java VM. None of those apps or games benefit desktop Linux. If Android used Qt, it would be a completely different story. Qt apps are truly cross-platform.

      If ou love Android so much, go ahead and run it on your desktop as your primary OS. I will continue to use Ubuntu and my N900 that has actually contributed to desktop Linux.

      • https://launchpad.net/~mpt mpt

        You’re confused. Neither Linus nor Jef mentioned “desktop Linux”. They were referring to Linux. You know, the kernel that Linus started.

        I don’t know whether Jef’s point is well-founded, but if it is, Java, Qt, and Android on a desktop (what?) are all irrelevant to it.

        • http://twitter.com/usemeego meegouser

          For every app that goes to Android, one less app goes to Desktop Linux.

          If you care about Ubuntu and other Linux distros then you would care about that.

          • Anonymous

            Yes, I would also prefer it this way. I wish Canonical would have the resources to do this and would support this over Android any day.

          • http://claimid.com/el-bhm bhm

            “For every app that goes to Android, one less app goes to Desktop Linux.”

            notsureifserious.png

      • Anonymous

        Exactly. It’s more than just using the Linux kernel. It’s about the whole Linux and FLOSS ecosystem.

        • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

          More like.. different experiences and APIs. Likewise you can replace the Linux kernel, Debian e.g. has kFreeBSD.

    • zekopeko

      Android uses a highly modified Linux kernel, the rest of it doesn’t share anything with a regular desktop. Its certainly a member of the Linux family of OSs but that’s about it.

      Please tone down your anti-Canonical/Ubuntu rhetoric.

      • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

        I would love nothing more than to see less rhetoric from all corners.

        Be aware that the ARMs race is happening outside the traditional desktop. ARM based device manufacturers are going after every segment of the market except for the desktop. Anyone who continues to see the expanding, growing market for wifi enabled mobile devices in a desktop-centric view is not taking a sober rational view of what is happening in the market place.

        -jef

    • http://twitter.com/om26er omer akram

      bite me.

    • https://launchpad.net/~mpt mpt

      Which Canonical employees, where?

      (I’m not saying Canonical employees have never made that mistake, it’s just surprising to me.)

      • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

        It was surprising to me too. I’m not suggesting is a is a pattern of behaviour yet…or a corporate talking point yet. But its the kind of opinioneering that influential managers can inadvertent and lazily repeat inside corporate virtual water cooler channels in a way that the idea take root as a truism worth bringing up as a talking point with prospective OEM customers and cause all sorts or problems.

        -jef

        • https://launchpad.net/~mpt mpt

          So, you don’t have any examples then? Okay. For a moment there I thought you might have had a point.

          • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

            I do have an example. And I’ve publicly replied via twitter to that person’s advertisement before reading this interview with linus here. My correspondence with the most salient example is publicly available in the form of recent twitter activity. If the person in questions wants to pop in here and defend what they wrote outside of a 140 character limit, they are free to do so. And you are free to look over the last day of tweets under my name and discover the person who I have found has most recently written a public strategic messaging article about the Ubuntu platform which runs afoul of this potentially OEM business damaging meme and have a private conversation with them about the long term business costs of painting Google’s platforms as non-linux. If this meme become a central theme of the Ubuntu platform stategic messaging its going to cause real problems with potential OEM vendors.

            -jef

          • https://launchpad.net/~mpt mpt

            “My correspondence with the most salient example is publicly available in the form of recent twitter activity”? What? Are you allergic to being straightforward?

            Anyway, your example turns out to be Jono Bacon, who you found writing: “While Apple and Google have done an excellent job with their respective platforms, there is a huge opportunity to make Linux a top-tier application platform, and this article outlines some of the work going on in the Ubuntu world to help encourage and motivate application developers and make their lives as easy as possible.”

            Jono was imprecise. Maybe he was trying to avoid using “Ubuntu” twice in the same sentence. Or maybe he was trying to appease those who would otherwise complain about Ubuntu going and doing its own thing. But whatever the cause, he did not mention “Ubuntu as a competing platform for new device form factors”, and his tutorial (“Clicking OK then pops up a final dialog box asking you to enter a merge message…”) was about as far from “strategic messaging” as you can get. So your original point is still baseless.

          • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

            One more reply. Regardless of what people assume my attentions are, my goal is to actually help prevent misinformation and miscommunication well ahead of any private OEM sitdowns that Canonical has. I very much want someone…anyone….to provide a _real_ competitive offering with what Google is doing in the retail space. Right now that someone is either Canonical(Ubuntu) or HP(webOS). I don’t know why exactly Canonical continues to not gain traction in the OEM space. But they arent and the window of opportunity with regard to ARM devices specifically is closing fast. And just sitting back and cheerleading Canonical leadership as they walk directly into customer talking point landmines they have planted for themselves isn’t going to change anything. I really don’t want to watch Canonical burn money chasing after OEM for 6 development cycles in a row and getting zero traction while Google just paves the landscape with Android. I really want a second linux-based platform out there as competition and if Canonical can’t deliver they need to just exit the space and make room for someone else to take a shot.

            -kef

          • Anonymous

            I agree, and share the same position. I think Canonical has got into this habit of conflating ‘Ubuntu Exceptionalism’ (we are not Linux, we play by different rules) with Innovation (we are like apple we play by our own rules!)

            It is the corporate equivalent of the conventional wisdom of the Ubuntu users on this site and elsewhere that ‘Fragmentation is bad for linux, except when Ubuntu does it’.

          • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

            The Canonical OEM team is growing at an alarming rate, surely they wouldn’t be hiring many people if there was no activity in that area.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HFFAZWO6UU5SLR4SXGLU2MUCX4 Morten

            OMG who are you jef? What do you look like? Who is the man behind these correctional comments? Who is the man who constantly signs his own name after the comment although it says right on top? Who has the energy to cover the whole internet with stupid know-it-all comments? You amaze me jef. Do you have kids?

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HFFAZWO6UU5SLR4SXGLU2MUCX4 Morten

            OMG who are you jef? What do you look like? Who is the man behind these correctional comments? Who is the man who constantly signs his own name after the comment although it says right on top? Who has the energy to cover the whole internet with stupid know-it-all comments? You amaze me jef. Do you have kids?

          • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

            Benjamin,
            Activity isn’t the same thing as execution. Canonical has spent a lot of money on a lot of things that haven’t really caught fire as sustainable offerings.

            I’d very much hope to see Ubuntu retail products on store shells both brick and mortar as well as virtual next to Android. At this point I’d even call 1/10 the retail market presence of Android a successful beach head into the post-desktop space. But Canonical’s window of opportunity is closing. MS is going to eventually enter the space and if Canonical isn’t firmly in the #2 position behind Android by they’ll get squeezed out when the two gorillas go pounding at each other. It doesn’t help that everything we are seeing now as demo units running Ubuntu are all Intel Atom processor based. A workable ARM offering just isn’t materializing fast enough for Canonical and they continue to be behind the curve with OEMs who want to put our consumer products that benefit from what ARM has to offer over intel.

            -jef.

    • http://claimid.com/el-bhm bhm

      Just in case you guys somehow don’t see his name there. It was JEF* posting there.

      _NOT_ Jef.

    • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

      So after reading the whole thread, i can make out that your way of working is – when confronted say “I tweeted that foo days back. Go find the proof yourself”

      You have always considered you a watchdog but now I feel I was wrong. Your only work is spreading FUD.

      You know what Ubuntu is called “Linux for human beings”. It is a tagline which I know and many others know, unless you have come to Ubuntu ecosystem x days back.

      Android uses Linux kernel so does Ubuntu. Android and Ubuntu are brand names. Trying to stuff terminology like GNU/Linux/X11/Ubuntu doesn’t work. Please go and read “Marketing 101″.

      • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

        Actually, I poked Jono in the eye over his article on twitter within a 24 hour period of reading this interview. It was not referring to something on twitter “foo days back.” I was sort of hoping Jono would go back and revise the article and remove the unnecessary messaging problems around the edges that didn’t related to his central message.

        But I’ll concede that I broke one of my own rules. For the record my general rule of thumb is to give people a week to revise written articles after they are published before I publicly cite mistakes in them outside of their respective comment threads. In this case I put myself into a conflicted position and felt it was inappropriate to call out Jono here when I haven’t given him the full benefit of my personal ethical rule about giving an author enough time to make an article correction before using them as an example elsewhere.

        I completely understand the marketing argument you are trying to make. Its the same argument I hope Jono and others take to heart in writing about the Ubuntu platform moving forward. Jono’s article is rife with mixed branding and imprise messaging that is only going to serve to confuse. I want to see the messaging around the Ubuntu platform tightened up into something less… imprecise.

        -jef

        • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

          Even when I have to use “ubuntu”, I just use Ubuntu and get over it rather than going fully idealistic and using GNU/Linux/Ubuntu because I feel that it is redundant. Does that help much? Non-techies don’t care. This naming is a turnoff for them.

        • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

          Even when I have to use “ubuntu”, I just use Ubuntu and get over it rather than going fully idealistic and using GNU/Linux/Ubuntu because I feel that it is redundant. Does that help much? Non-techies don’t care. This naming is a turnoff for them.

  • Anonymous

    cudos! … well done

  • http://twitter.com/jerboamuaddib Jerboa Muad’Dib

    Please, if you put “interview” into the headline, then make it an interview. Not an essay with a couple of quotes.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      I’m fairly sure I asked Linus some specific questions, and he responded with specific answers to those questions, therefore by the following definition, this was an interview.

      “An interview is a conversation between two or more people (the interviewer and the interviewee) where questions are asked by the interviewer to obtain information from the interviewee.”

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interview

      • Anonymous

        I think you missed the point on that one, Ben.

        • Marie

          Well, we shouldn’t be too hard on Ben. After all, he’s just blogging for cash — he’s not a professional journalist. : – p

          • http://twitter.com/mickstep Michael Stephenson

            That was a snarky comment that was designed to be hurtful, and it was completely unwarranted.
            It’s funny how easily these “community spirits” shift into attack mode, and focus on attacking the individual, rather than criticise their actions.

          • Polly

            It sounds like the comment was supporting Benjamin. We should all have a little sense of humour and not be so defensive or quick to assume. Everyone is entitled to their opinions but I don’t think this person was attacking anyone. Seems like some people were nitpicking his article though — it was actually an interesting read, regardless of the criticisms or little flaws.

          • http://twitter.com/mickstep Michael Stephenson

            Polly – Just read the other comments Marie posted and you’ll know it wasn’t supportive.

          • Polly

            Michael,

            That was a snarky comment that was designed to be hurtful, and it was completely unwarranted. I’ve read Marie’s posts. No, I’m not a sockpuppet — I’m a funny, smart, and popular woman like Marie. She got a lot of likes. We need the input of more women in the community and I’m against censorship. I do like sockpuppets and Ben’s articles though. Ever seen The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson? lol

          • Polly

            Michael,

            That was a snarky comment that was designed to be hurtful, and it was completely unwarranted. I’ve read Marie’s posts. No, I’m not a sockpuppet — I’m a funny, smart, and popular woman like Marie. She got a lot of likes. We need the input of more women in the community and I’m against censorship. I do like sockpuppets and Ben’s articles though. Ever seen The Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson? lol

          • http://twitter.com/mickstep Michael Stephenson

            It wasn’t designed to be hurtful like Marie’s was, I suspected it to be true. It would have been designed to be hurtful if I knew it wasn’t true.
            If you aren’t Marie’s sockpuppet then I apologise.

          • Polly

            Thanks, Michael. I don’t always agree with you, but I do enjoy reading your posts and support your right to post them. ;)

          • http://twitter.com/johnkahuna john

            I’d hate to think omgubuntu will turn out like slashdot’s pretentious, and aggressive comments to every single article posted!

            I always enjoyed the general friendliness of Ubuntu’s community, and recently have seen more of this arrogant attitude. 

            Let’s play nice? :-)

          • http://twitter.com/johnkahuna john

            I’d hate to think omgubuntu will turn out like slashdot’s pretentious, and aggressive comments to every single article posted!

            I always enjoyed the general friendliness of Ubuntu’s community, and recently have seen more of this arrogant attitude. 

            Let’s play nice? :-)

          • http://twitter.com/johnkahuna john

            I’d hate to think omgubuntu will turn out like slashdot’s pretentious, and aggressive comments to every single article posted!

            I always enjoyed the general friendliness of Ubuntu’s community, and recently have seen more of this arrogant attitude. 

            Let’s play nice? :-)

          • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

            I have several problems with this.

            Firstly, how would you know if I had a journalism degree or not?

            Secondly, what defines a “professional journalist?” A degree? In that case, because Joey has a broadcast journalism degree is he a professional journalist and am I not?

            Or is it the place you work for? Perhaps if I worked for say, The New York Times or Al Jazeera, would I be a professional journalist? But surely those people work for cash too?

            Or, is it the medium on which you publish news? Is “the Internet” not an acceptable means of communicating information to a wider audience? Is it not professional enough for you?

            If I started out a small Ubuntu magazine company and sold print publications in stores, would that make me professional by your standards?

            What about Linux Weekly News? Are they professional? They’ve certainly been around a lot longer than us, but Jonathan Corbet doesn’t have a journalism degree – surely they mustn’t be professional either.

            Thirdly, how do you know a) our financial situation, ie, where the revenue from the ads are going and b) that I’m not doing this because I am actually passionate about Ubuntu? Do you remember this? http://ubuntu-manual.org ?

            Fourthly, I could interpret your comment as a personal insult, thereby in breach of #1 on our commenting code of conduct.

            http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/code-of-conduct/

          • Anonymous

            Isn’t this being a bit oversensitive?

          • Anonymous

            i assume it was a joke and not to be taken so seriously.

          • http://twitter.com/conscioususer Conscious User

            Successful troll is successful.

          • http://twitter.com/conscioususer Conscious User

            Successful troll is successful.

          • Anonymous

            Ironic.

  • Anonymous

    Isn’t that Tux dressed as Linus? Impostor! :P

  • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

    “I’ve always had a few problems [with Ubuntu.] It’s not very friendly to kernel developers, and I just end up giving up. That’s kind of okay, because clearly I am not the target audience.”

    The obvious follow up questions:

    a) What are we doing that makes Ubuntu unsuitable for kernel work in his mind (I believe that Andrew Morton, his next in the command, uses Ubuntu)

    b) How could we improve the situation?

    It seems less like an interview and more like a collection of quotes. Though I am sure quotes from an interesting conversation.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      See above re: whether it’s an interview or not.

      As for the answers to those questions, the reason I didn’t delve into more detail is that

      a) it’s not my place to, if Canonical want Linus to be using Ubuntu for some reason, then it’s up to them to ask him what they can do to improve the kernel support,

      b) it’s not particularly relevant to our audience (I wanted to push on with broader questions rather than asking specific details about the kernel)

      and c) we were actually in a hurry to grab a bus, so the amount of time I had with Linus was limited.

      • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

        I can’t help it, I am naturally curious and I would genuinely like to know.. consider it musings rather than criticism.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for sharing this interview. Always interesting to hear what Linus has to say. He always seems to have a practical sense of priorities.

  • Anonymous

    the father of the (kernelLINUX)
    I wish long life for this man !!
    i love you *****LINUS*****

  • http://claimid.com/el-bhm bhm

    Benji, if you really like Linus, take of one of the pictures. Either your +200 Sassy or “Hey look, Linus-shopped here and Greasy-Nerd-version-Linus there”. Right now it looks like one of those tabloids’ “After and before operation” pics. Yeah, yeah, we all know how nerds might look, but keep the tone consistent.

    “Our talk with Linus…” or anything in that colour would be far better than “interview”. Interview implies exchange of questions and answers.

    Oh, once I club you to death, be sure you gonna hear “That’s because I care” ;).

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LOR655GR4ZFHCMSV7FW5ROPSAA Cliff W

      Also, I noticed Benjamin photoshopped himself to look taller than Linus.

      Pretty weak.

  • Anonymous

    linus is an awesum man! but sometimes i feel sorry for stallman.. :p
    all linux users should watch ‘revolution os’

    • Anonymous

      Watched it a while ago. It was really informative.

  • Anonymous

    Legendary! Good work Benjamin :)

  • Akshat Jain

    There are some of us who worship Linus…

  • Akshat Jain

    There are some of us who worship Linus…

  • Anonymous

    What a complete nag this interview was to read. There’s no need for you to reiterate every two sentences Torvalds says, no matter how cool large fonts are.

  • Anonymous

    What a complete nag this interview was to read. There’s no need for you to reiterate every two sentences Torvalds says, no matter how cool large fonts are.

  • Anonymous

    Lets hope the kernel doesnt get as big as Linus himself :)) Im kidding, he is ‘The Man’ of course.

  • http://twitter.com/zc456 Squeaks

    Glad we share the same opinion on Debian. Loved the interview.

  • Anonymous

    What type of ASUS desktop PC is that? Looks really nice and I could not find it on their website.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rafael-Wingnux/100000262462785 Rafael Wingnux

    Wow, you’re pretty hot, Benjamin!

  • http://twitter.com/SarcasticSloth Steven Garza

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

    Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

    There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

    • http://twitter.com/KyleClarkeNZ Kyle Clarke

      You say vacuum cleaner I say Hoover.

      • http://claimid.com/el-bhm bhm

        I say potato not potato.

      • Marie

        Well in this case, the vacuum cleaner is GNU/Linux and Hoover is Ubuntu.

    • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

      Please take your trolling to /dev/null

      • Anonymous

        What Steven said was absolutely correct .

        • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

          What he did was copy paste a tried pointless entirely misguided argument from the FSF. It is not even original, it’s word for word copied from the RMS pamphlet on GNU trolling for beginners. (I encourage people to Google parts of that text and you will find the exact same content posted by multiple others).

          Henceforth, I demand that you call it X11/GNOME/KDE/FreeDesktop.org/usr/bin/(….)/Linux – to correctly show attribution. I will also infest comment sections, blogs and forums around the world with my non-sense, however off-topic it might be.

          And don’t give me the “we originated the philosophy so you must give us kudos, respect and naming rights” bull, that is moving the goalpost from the original fallacious argument but most importantly this one is also wrong. (see: BSD and other projects with similar licensing and aims predating GNU)

          It is trolling and has no place in the comment section what so ever. Worse though it is uninformed, illogical and will lead to people being misinformed. The author clearly has not informed himself, how can he inform others?

          • Marie

            It wasn’t just the philosophy, but the tools as well. It is an awful strategy to call people trolls, just because you don’t agree with them. I think there is enough room for everyone’s opinions. Have a great GNU day.

          • Anonymous

            Personally I prefer people at least understand GNU’s contributions; I’m glad they did it! BUT, I don’t like people that refer to it as GNU/Linux…I mean, GNU is just so hard to get your tongue around…

      • http://claimid.com/el-bhm bhm

        I’d rather put here Captain Hindsight joke here rather troll stigma.

        To be honest, he doesn’t point at anyone yelling invectives, but just presents info in comments section of article that will get a lot of attention.
        While it might be unnerving to people aware of that knowledge, Ubuntu community is almost classically unaware of these distinctions. For whatever reasons.

      • Marie

        Sorry, but it is not trolling when it’s the truth. Ubuntu is a GNU operating system with a Linux kernel. : D

        • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

          Also X11, also full of freedesktop tools, also GNOME etc etc etc.
          Next time you should give credits to all of them. Next time don’t call Ubuntu as Linux but X11/GNOME/FreeDesktop.org/GNU/Linux/Compiz/Mozilla

          • Polly

            Well, we’re talking about the operating system not the desktop environment, but you make a good point. In that case, Ubuntu GNU/Linux Gnome Edition, for example, would cover much of it. I’ll admit though, sometimes I just say Linux or GNU for brevity. It gets a little long to always say GNU/Linux. How about Lignux? I don’t know how we would pronounce that though.

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            What actually defines an OS? Just the kernel? Then in this case the name “Linux” is more appropriate than “GNU/Linux”. If userland tools are also important then the Desktop Environment is also a part of Operating System.

            For me, an Operating System is the software stack and collection which can solve the problems of people. SO yes, DE is a part of OS just like kernel.

            I acknowledge that everyone’s work is important. Without everyone’s hard work we won’t have this awesome desktop. It is just I am pretty lazy at calling it GNU/Linux (which doesn’t mean I don’t acknowledge GNU’s contributions)

        • https://launchpad.net/~saji89 Saji nediyanchath

          Wrong…wrong.. Kernel is what the core part of an OS is. Without kernel there is no OS. :)

    • http://twitter.com/davbren David Gross

      Social Life Fail!

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/harveycabaguio Harvey

    Sorry for being offtopic, but what happened to the omgubuntu forum, the app, and can you move the create comment textbox above the comments? It’s really annoying to have to scroll all the way down just to make a comment.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      “It’s really annoying to have to scroll all the way down just to make a comment.”

      There’s a reason for that, and that’s to force people to read the comments before they post “me too” style additions – this reduces duplication and actually encourages use of the “like” button, which is the exact reason that function exists.

      It’s the same reason Launchpad moved their new comment box to the bottom.

      • http://twitter.com/tonyhartfield tonyhartfield

        I would also like to know what happened to the omgubuntu forum…

        • Akshat Jain

          its at forum.ubuntugamer.com now

      • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

        Probably you have seen this cult post from Poul-Henning Kamp http://bikeshed.org/
        Check the four dialog boxes which he proposed. Sums up the reason.

        Another stupid kind of comment is “Thanks, I will stick to my foo”

  • Marie

    Great…now let’s get an interview with Richard Stallman. : ) hehe

    • Anonymous

      from what i have read stallman doesn’t like to give interview to people who are adobe fanboys and call the operating system they are using as linux instead of gnu/linux.

      • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

        If you like to get RMS’s stand, go and read his articles on fsf.org which should suffice. Linus doesn’t blog much about his views on blog. His personal blog is more of family blog.

        BTW if you took RMS’s interview, I guess these would be the salient points
        * It’s our duty to bring justice to Emacs Virgin
        * A 5 mins lecture on Saint Ignucius
        * A language foo is bad
        * A technology foo is bad
        * Did omgubuntu who is taking my interview run GPL code? Or are their theme released under GPL v3?
        ……….
        etc

        • Marie

          I don’t agree with everything Stallman says — as his standards are really high, but Ubuntu seems to have very little “freedom” standards these days and should do themselves a favor by incorporating some of his ideals. My favorite release was Jaunty — the direction Ubuntu has gone since then is frightening.

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            Ubuntu has one more aim. Make Linux/Free-Software usable for thousands of people. This is where compromise has to be done. I don’t think this is the specific aim of FSF. Their aim is to advance free-software

            Since Ubuntu targets everyone which includes non-techies so they need to have something for non-techies too. Non-techies are mostly interested in usability and getting their work done and don’t care about source code. geeks care about source code so every piece of software that comes with ubuntu pre-installed is FOSS.

            Which less freedom you talking about? if you don’t state it then you are just wasting everyone’s time. Name one non-free software which Ubuntu ships which has a free-alternative in other distros? If you are saying that non-GPL applications are not-free as per RMS’s standard, then we don’t care about RMS’s standards.

          • Anonymous

            no one said non-GPLed apps are not-free as per rms standards.

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            “If you are saying that non-GPL applications are not-free as per RMS’s standard, then we don’t care about RMS’s standards.”

            *if* is the keyword. Read again

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            “If you are saying that non-GPL applications are not-free as per RMS’s standard, then we don’t care about RMS’s standards.”

            *if* is the keyword. Read again

        • Anonymous

          you can mock rms as much as you can you won’t get anything from it.
          also i never mentioned i wanted to get rms stand on omgu i just mentioned why rms is not likely to give a interview on omgu.

        • http://www.expatsinksa.com/ Bilal Akhtar

          Add to that list: Why don’t you Ubuntu fanboys get Canonical to drop the non-free universe and multiverse repositories?

          Why is OpenStack (http://www.openstack.org/) called OpenStack and not FreeStack?

          Why Bloatware (aka Emacs) is better than Speediness and Robustness (aka Vi)

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            Emacs is not a bloatware, it is an Operating System :P

      • Marie

        Exactly. ;)

    • http://www.traskmind.com Trask Trojanek

      I actually got him to give me an interview (about 10-15 questions, I believe) for a college product a few years back.
      Sadly, I didn’t hold onto it..

  • Anonymous

    It would have been interesting to get his comments on your famous ‘neck beard’ blog post.

    • http://twitter.com/conscioususer Conscious User

      He’d probably agree with a lot of it, actually. Linus has always prioritized pragmatism over ideology and has always criticized exaggerations from the FSF.

      Plus, Linus occasionally uses tones so aggressive that make Benjamin sound like Pollyanna in comparison.

    • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

      I disagree with the tone of that post and a few points, but agree with a huge part of it. Running away from truth the easiest thing you can do. Everyone does. You do. I do. Everyone does.

      • Anonymous

        Yeah, it is a shame he deleted his blog and that post along with it.

  • http://twitter.com/dmaxel Danny

    When I checked Wikipedia, it said that (as of 2008) Linus said he used Fedora…I wonder if that’s still the case if he said he doesn’t use Ubuntu. I know that Fedora is a lot friendlier to kernel-devs than Ubuntu since Fedora prefers to help upstream.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      Linus still uses Fedora.

      • Anonymous

        What DE? I think I remember him being very con-Gnome.

      • Marie

        Cool. I think Richard uses Ubuntu-based gNewSense and/or Trisquel.

        • Anonymous

          rms uses gNewSense .

        • Anonymous

          rms uses gNewSense .

    • https://launchpad.net/~davidnielsen David Nielsen

      Which is a bit of an odd view, considering how many entirely unmergable patches are in the Fedora kernel.

      Ubuntu has been polishing long standing out of kernel features and getting them merged upstream. AppArmor is the prime example but parts of the GrSecurity and similar features are now seeing the same treatment. All the Linaro ARM work is also going upstream,

      I suspect it more down to a workflow and the rapid cycling through kernels during development (to aid testing) which makes Linus view it as a better home for kernel developers.

      • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

        I would have thought the daily mainline kernel PPA that the Canonical kernel team maintains would have addressed most speed bumps for kernel developers, other than differences in version control tooling.

        • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

          “other than differences in version control tooling.”?
          Explain please. I wish to know more about this.

          • Anonymous

            I think Jef might have assumed that the Ubuntu kernel devs use bzr, but I recall reading somewhere that they actually use git in this one specific case.

            Obviously this is because all kernel development is done in git so it makes sense*

            * and cause git won the DVCS war at least a year ago, on account of being awesome, Ubuntu didn’t get the memo!

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            They use git, so I asked for clarification. One more proof of don’t say anything unless you are sure what you are saying.

            git won the war long back because it was made by an awesome person named Linus and his gang. Linus is an expert in FS and as I heard git is internally implemented as a filesystem.

            Actually git pwned everything. svn, darcs, hg etc. I love git but for a newcomer to get a grasp of git. I have seen great programmer struggling with git. bzr/svn is easy to learn.

          • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

            Yep I’ve misremembered. Verifying what is documented about the mainline PPA again and I’ll make a stronger statement than before with no speculative hedging. I cannot identify any obvious deficiency in the daily mainline kernel PPA or in the patch submission process surrounding it that would be out of step with my meager understanding of the upstream kernel development process.

            -jef

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the interview – always a pleasure to hear from the creator.

    For the record, the first installable livecd was MEPIS’s first official release on 10 May 2003.

    Kanotix – “The first “Kanotix”-preview was released at 24 December 2003″

    Release date for Ubuntu 6.06 was 1 June 2003

    • Anonymous

      “The first Linux-based ‘Live CD’ was Yggdrasil Linux first released in beta form 1992~1993″

      • Anonymous

        Yggdrasil Linux was a live-CD but did not include an installer.

        • Anonymous

          fml.

          • Anonymous

            “fml.” ??

          • Anonymous

            With DemoLinux2, you had to install it on a hard drive, not run from the CD

  • Anonymous

    Where do you see that he’s one of Time’s most important people of the century ? There’s 4 people only who shape both the 20th century and the early 21st, and Bill Gates is one of them…

  • http://w1ngnut.myopenid.com/ w1ngnut

    Dude, few people changed the world. This guy is one of them! And for the better, of course!

  • http://twitter.com/danizmax Daniel

    I saw few vids and documentaries of Linus and he was always nice, interesting even funny guy. Always enjoyed his speeches.

  • http://mark-y-a.myopenid.com/ Mark

    What I really don’t understand is that out of the so many that GNU has made, why didn’t they make a kernel? I’m confused. They wouldn’t have trouble making it then or now… or is there one and it just didn’t get as popular as Linux?

    • http://twitter.com/jspaleta Jef Spaleta

      they did make a kernel… GNU hurd.

      • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

        Still in development… No one knows when it is going to be released.

        I compared it to Duke Nukem. Now when Duke Nukem is going to be released, I think Hurd can take the place of Duke Nukem as the new benchmark.

        • Anonymous

          Is duke nukem free software?

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            No. That was not the point. I was talking about the hype. Please stop taking things literally. I know mentioning non-free software is blasphemy.

          • Anonymous

            that is a point.
            hurd never had the hype.
            even if it is not complete all that has been done is open and free to use.
            you can even use debian GNU/HURD.
            also “Latest stable release L1 / October 19, 2009; 14 months ago”

          • Anonymous

            also even stallman knows and accepts that gnu/linux and not gnu/hurd is the future of free OSes.
            when linux has been heavily developed and advanced much ahead of hurd whats the point of continuing to develop it rather that focusing on the priority fsf projects?

          • http://www.manishsinha.net Manish Sinha

            Hurd was certainly a hype. Atleast in my opinion. Linux kernel pwned it.

            akrocks, the point is not that the code is complete which makes Hurd a success. It’s widespread deployment and adoption is the key factors which determine it’s success. This is where Hurd fails.
            GNU userland tools was an astonishing success. It is a brilliant thing, just that a complementary kernel which could have finished the GNU OS is far from reality.

            “”when linux has been heavily developed and advanced much ahead of hurd whats the point of continuing to develop it rather that focusing on the priority fsf projects?”"
            I never said that they should continue is. Put the money and effort where the mouth is. I just said that Hurd was a failure. I don’t blame the developers for it. Getting a kernel up and running and making it widespread deployed is not an easy thing.

            I am just saying it failed. It had lot of hype during it’s days. The hype died down. It is sort of useless to focus on Hurd when other parts of GNU tools need love.

    • http://www.expatsinksa.com/ Bilal Akhtar

      They did make Hurd, but it was a failure. Even RMS accepted that it was a big failure when compared with Linux.

    • http://www.expatsinksa.com/ Bilal Akhtar

      They did make Hurd, but it was a failure. Even RMS accepted that it was a big failure when compared with Linux.

    • http://www.expatsinksa.com/ Bilal Akhtar

      They did make Hurd, but it was a failure. Even RMS accepted that it was a big failure when compared with Linux.

  • http://lenindcruz.deviantart.com Lenin D

    This whole discussion in the comments section with Ben and others reminds me that we are humans and with our own little egos – you, me and everyone. This is what happens when people try to go ‘opensource’ and the ‘communism’ way. Sooner or later the idea of ‘ownership’ pops up.

    This is precisely why there are less headaches in capitalism and proprietary stuff – OWNERSHIP is a culture, not an evil by-product. While in ‘free’ culture people with good intentions will try to make things that the community can use but sooner or later someone will wonder how much effort others put in that they try to have a say in things with such authority. They then start getting defensive when ‘less involved’ people start giving as much feedback as ‘more involved’ people.

    I am not trying to be discouraging (not that it will matter to those with real passion) but I have a feeling that just like communism, the OpenSource and FOSS culture is actually going against the basic nature of humans.

  • http://twitter.com/Afrodiseum N.C. Weber

    Great interview. Really hits the salient points. But forgive me for drooling over that very slick looking Asus desktop . :-)

  • http://twitter.com/daremusik dare

    An interesting interview. Mostly because it’s Linus Torvalds. As another reader pointed out in these comments, Benjamine didn’t really ask follow up questions (or if he did they weren’t written here).

    I actually don’t mind most of the quotes. I noticed a couple that were like half sentences or immaterial. As another user wrote, it can be handy, especially when scrolling through afterwards.

    However, sadly, this being my last point or comment or visit ever to this site, I shall not be returning for the simple reason that although Benjamine’s first comment didn’t seem douchey to me, more just straight/direct (he really can do what he wants), his subsequent comments really were completely douchey as others had accused him of. Quite disgusting actually. I wish you all the best Benjamin but I will never again return to this website because of this. I am anti-bullies (doesn’t apply to you), and anti-douchebags. Best of luck

  • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

    “You could have simply linked to the relevant tweet. I’m not going to do it since I would wait until Ragnarök for OMGUbuntu mods to approve it.”

    Actually, we turned off link moderation a couple of months back, so you should be fine to post links and have them appear instantly. =)

  • http://twitter.com/gymjbstu Greg

    Nevermind, after looking over the article again I see that this isn’t what you were talking about.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NUOEKU4AMUNDUI6JDMSEMVJY2Y Vish

    Nice work Benjamin!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NMNDQTZ2B6TV57I7JXCAF57NYU Alex

    The interview was decent, but the comments and attitude of the author afterwards make me want to get my Ubuntu news elsewhere.

  • chris xris

    The truth is ubuntu has spoiled us and make us less geeks. lol
    At 1999 i remember myself trying to install slackware and compiling a hell of packages plus kernel , i remember how much time it took to compile kde. And the result was not very rewarding to say the truth for a strange reason it was so god damned slow that i couldn’t use it.
    Also my compiled kernel was always so big . Lol i’m glad there is ubuntu cause our time is precious i could invest that time somewhere else.

  • Anonymous

    I just pledged $10. If I’m going to give money, I might as well get an honorable mention.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PKXCCZ6TYKS6IYAYXOVAERMSU4 Gautham

    Good article ben .. I like your attitude … Well done … 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AT5QBXYRCQA5HXCKO54YDATF64 John M

    Wow, the author of this article seems like a real jackass. I only came here to read what Linus had to say, not the excessive drivel that the author added onto that. And his attitude toward readers of the article, well that speaks volumes.

    Typical Ubuntu fanboy: http://freebc.co.uk/ubuntu

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AT5QBXYRCQA5HXCKO54YDATF64 John M

    Wow, the author of this article seems like a real jackass. I only came here to read what Linus had to say, not the excessive drivel that the author added onto that. And his attitude toward readers of the article, well that speaks volumes.

    Typical Ubuntu fanboy: http://freebc.co.uk/ubuntu

  • Jian H. L.

    - What will Canonical (空壳) Inc. do or where will it go ‘IF DEBIAN DISCONTINUES’? 

    - Has Cann. had enough backup of Debian packages already?

    - Will Cann. give Debian some financial support to thank them?

  • Pingback: My Bookmarks » Bruce Perens Announced As Linux.conf.au 2012 Keynote Speaker

  • Luís Fernando Carvalho Cavalhe

    So luck guy, getting a time to talk to this great man!

  • Pingback: Эксклюзивное интервью с Линусом Торвальдсом

  • http://www.pc-freak.net/ Georgi Georgiev

    By accident I’ve figured out there is a relation between Linus torvalds name and Christian faith. You can read my curious research here – http://www.pc-freak.net/blog/creator-of-linux-kernel-linus-torvalds-has-a-biblical-name/