<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Is Karmic Koala Ubuntu&#8217;s Vista?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista</link> <description>Everything Ubuntu. Daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Martin Wildam</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-5434</link> <dc:creator>Martin Wildam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-5434</guid> <description>As far as I can summarize from my own experience yet already with different updates (not just my machine) and from all what I have read until now is:Even in relation to 9.04, in 9.10 there are important fixes (e.g. some problems with some Intel graphic cards) and expected application updates.However, there were some new problems introduced. While my sound experience was better in 9.10 out of the box (I had problems in 9.04 with Skype - that anyway were fixable), a lot of others had problems. I would not in general blame PulseAudio. I would rather think, that by the attempt to remove other sound stuff (that often caused conflicts - since I am on Linux - even Fedora - I always had troubles with sound to get them to work), the transition to PulseAudio was not an easy one and hence some bugs occurring.There also have been issues introduced in 9.10 with mobile internet sticks not working any more (I also was affected myself by this) - but most of these issues could be fixed by firmware updates and fixes in the Linux kernel (which BTW is not Ubuntu-specific and hence not necessarily related to their release schedules).In general regarding the release schedules, the hurry is not necessary because Canonical/Community can choose what to include/bring further for the next release. They could easily be in schedule by not changing too much.From history I would say Linux evolved that fast in the last years that - I guess - most were already waiting for a lot of new cool stuff and within 6 months there were huge changes. From current point of view as I have quite everything I need I would also have no problems if a new release would appear only once in a year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can summarize from my own experience yet already with different updates (not just my machine) and from all what I have read until now is:</p><p>Even in relation to 9.04, in 9.10 there are important fixes (e.g. some problems with some Intel graphic cards) and expected application updates.</p><p>However, there were some new problems introduced. While my sound experience was better in 9.10 out of the box (I had problems in 9.04 with Skype &#8211; that anyway were fixable), a lot of others had problems. I would not in general blame PulseAudio. I would rather think, that by the attempt to remove other sound stuff (that often caused conflicts &#8211; since I am on Linux &#8211; even Fedora &#8211; I always had troubles with sound to get them to work), the transition to PulseAudio was not an easy one and hence some bugs occurring.</p><p>There also have been issues introduced in 9.10 with mobile internet sticks not working any more (I also was affected myself by this) &#8211; but most of these issues could be fixed by firmware updates and fixes in the Linux kernel (which BTW is not Ubuntu-specific and hence not necessarily related to their release schedules).</p><p>In general regarding the release schedules, the hurry is not necessary because Canonical/Community can choose what to include/bring further for the next release. They could easily be in schedule by not changing too much.</p><p>From history I would say Linux evolved that fast in the last years that &#8211; I guess &#8211; most were already waiting for a lot of new cool stuff and within 6 months there were huge changes. From current point of view as I have quite everything I need I would also have no problems if a new release would appear only once in a year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-5432</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-5432</guid> <description>The fact that ONLY 1/3 had a successful event with Karmic is terrible.  You seem to feel that throwing crap out the door to keep a sentimental schedule is just stupid.  You make absolutely NO apology and you basically yell &quot;shut up and sit down.&quot;   What purpose then is feedback.  Do you just pick the feel good articles to respond? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that ONLY 1/3 had a successful event with Karmic is terrible.  You seem to feel that throwing crap out the door to keep a sentimental schedule is just stupid.  You make absolutely NO apology and you basically yell &#8220;shut up and sit down.&#8221;   What purpose then is feedback.  Do you just pick the feel good articles to respond?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph Schwenker</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4411</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Schwenker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4411</guid> <description>I guess that my experience was similar to yours, Martin, although my problems with audio were greatly amplified because I had to kill/uninstall PulseAudio many times so that WINE and games (OpenArena, Yo Frankie!, etc.) would work.  Maybe if PulseAudio works as well as ALSA in 9.04, I will upgrade to 10.04.  I really hope this is fixed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that my experience was similar to yours, Martin, although my problems with audio were greatly amplified because I had to kill/uninstall PulseAudio many times so that WINE and games (OpenArena, Yo Frankie!, etc.) would work.  Maybe if PulseAudio works as well as ALSA in 9.04, I will upgrade to 10.04.  I really hope this is fixed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin Wildam</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4410</link> <dc:creator>Martin Wildam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4410</guid> <description>I had completely different experience. 9.10 in general solved a view issues I had with graphic and even with sound.One important thing: If you use Skype just upgrade to the newest Linux version and don&#039;t allow Skype to manipulate your mixer levels (there is an appropriate option in the Skype settings).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had completely different experience. 9.10 in general solved a view issues I had with graphic and even with sound.</p><p>One important thing: If you use Skype just upgrade to the newest Linux version and don&#8217;t allow Skype to manipulate your mixer levels (there is an appropriate option in the Skype settings).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martini1179</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4403</link> <dc:creator>Martini1179</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4403</guid> <description>Here here!Karmic is a turd dipped in diarrhea pudding.As a new-ish Ubuntu user, I started using Ubuntu in the last days of Intrepid, and then upgraded to Karmic with no problems. When I cautiously upgraded to Karmic six weeks after release (to give Canonical time to shake out all the bugs), I was sorely disappointed. Among the problems I&#039;ve experienced:Proprietary NVIDIA driver crashes on a daily basis (and system stalls on resume from suspend when using default NVIDIA free driver), Video hue off by default (aka the Smurf Effect) on all non-Flash video, Periodic audio problems -- audio becomes scratchy and static-y.What&#039;s good about Karmic? Well, things seem to launch a bit faster, and the packages in the Upgrade Manager are sorted by their PPA.I&#039;ve traded a stable, problem-free Jaunty install for THIS. If I had an external HD I&#039;d have backed up my data, reinstalled Jaunty, downloaded/burned a Karmic disc and ceremoniously destroyed it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here!</p><p>Karmic is a turd dipped in diarrhea pudding.</p><p>As a new-ish Ubuntu user, I started using Ubuntu in the last days of Intrepid, and then upgraded to Karmic with no problems. When I cautiously upgraded to Karmic six weeks after release (to give Canonical time to shake out all the bugs), I was sorely disappointed. Among the problems I&#8217;ve experienced:</p><p>Proprietary NVIDIA driver crashes on a daily basis<br /> (and system stalls on resume from suspend when using default NVIDIA free driver),<br /> Video hue off by default (aka the Smurf Effect) on all non-Flash video,<br /> Periodic audio problems &#8212; audio becomes scratchy and static-y.</p><p>What&#8217;s good about Karmic? Well, things seem to launch a bit faster, and the packages in the Upgrade Manager are sorted by their PPA.</p><p>I&#8217;ve traded a stable, problem-free Jaunty install for THIS. If I had an external HD I&#8217;d have backed up my data, reinstalled Jaunty, downloaded/burned a Karmic disc and ceremoniously destroyed it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joseph Schwenker</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4401</link> <dc:creator>Joseph Schwenker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4401</guid> <description>Oh dear.  Ubuntu 9.10 was a COMPLETE DISASTER for me.  It was all pretty and wonderful, and I really liked it at first.  It was like Windows Vista; beautiful until it crashes.  And there I was, wondering why I wasn&#039;t getting any sound in WINE.  I soon find other applications that have sound problems too.  I post it on Ubuntu Forums, and spend DAYS trying to solve my problems, and it turns out that PulseAudio is the criminal.  Incompatibilities with so many things... of course, the volume applet only works with PulseAudio, so you&#039;re kind of forced to use it.  OpenArena (in 9.10&#039;s repositories) has unlistenable audio.  Not to mention all of the other applications... wow.  I was forced to leave 9.10 for 9.04 after it just crashed.  Files disappearing... it was as unstable as the Citadael&#039;s core in Half-Life 2: Episode 1!  9.04, is, in my opinion, an LTS.  It is fast, stable, and doesn&#039;t rely on PulseAudio.  I can say with much confidence that I will not be upgrading to 10.04 if Canonical decides to keep PulseAudio.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear.  Ubuntu 9.10 was a COMPLETE DISASTER for me.  It was all pretty and wonderful, and I really liked it at first.  It was like Windows Vista; beautiful until it crashes.  And there I was, wondering why I wasn&#8217;t getting any sound in WINE.  I soon find other applications that have sound problems too.  I post it on Ubuntu Forums, and spend DAYS trying to solve my problems, and it turns out that PulseAudio is the criminal.  Incompatibilities with so many things&#8230; of course, the volume applet only works with PulseAudio, so you&#8217;re kind of forced to use it.  OpenArena (in 9.10&#8242;s repositories) has unlistenable audio.  Not to mention all of the other applications&#8230; wow.  I was forced to leave 9.10 for 9.04 after it just crashed.  Files disappearing&#8230; it was as unstable as the Citadael&#8217;s core in Half-Life 2: Episode 1!  9.04, is, in my opinion, an LTS.  It is fast, stable, and doesn&#8217;t rely on PulseAudio.  I can say with much confidence that I will not be upgrading to 10.04 if Canonical decides to keep PulseAudio.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martini1179</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4133</link> <dc:creator>Martini1179</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4133</guid> <description>Well I think the problem might be the NVIDIA driver itself, so I&#039;m trying to go back to the version Jaunty had, which I believe was 180.44. I&#039;d rather use Envy, since I read the Ubuntu support pages for manually installing a driver and learned that you&#039;re going to have to mess with the process again after any updates to mesa or linux-image, and Envy apparently does some of that for you. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the problem might be the NVIDIA driver itself, so I&#8217;m trying to go back to the version Jaunty had, which I believe was 180.44. I&#8217;d rather use Envy, since I read the Ubuntu support pages for manually installing a driver and learned that you&#8217;re going to have to mess with the process again after any updates to mesa or linux-image, and Envy apparently does some of that for you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4131</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4131</guid> <description>Which driver number are you trying to use? Why EnvyNG? Have you tried installing the driver from Nvidia&#039;s site manually? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which driver number are you trying to use? Why EnvyNG? Have you tried installing the driver from Nvidia&#8217;s site manually?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martini1179</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4128</link> <dc:creator>Martini1179</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4128</guid> <description>Sorry to be posting a comment to such an old article, but I just upgraded my Jaunty install to Karmic and I&#039;m having some problems.Basically, I&#039;m getting Xid errors from the NVIDIA driver about every other day, and the system usually crashes after giving me a corrupted, garbled desktop. Jaunty was FLAWLESS, and the issues started immediately after upgrading.Does anyone know if EnvyNG is still being maintained? It doesn&#039;t work in Karmic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be posting a comment to such an old article, but I just upgraded my Jaunty install to Karmic and I&#8217;m having some problems.</p><p>Basically, I&#8217;m getting Xid errors from the NVIDIA driver about every other day, and the system usually crashes after giving me a corrupted, garbled desktop. Jaunty was FLAWLESS, and the issues started immediately after upgrading.</p><p>Does anyone know if EnvyNG is still being maintained? It doesn&#8217;t work in Karmic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4124</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-4124</guid> <description>I loved Karmic the first time I set my eyes on it since it solved some hair pulling issues with previous Ubuntu which were being able to remove tap pad = double click and WiFi which always jumped on while I disabled that in my BIOS. I had one issue once when my screen was completely disabled but that was when I was trying an Alpha version so can&#039;t blame anyone (although maybe Asus).Also I never do an update but do a simple clean install on another partition on my quad boot machine (2 Ubuntu, 2 very old Windoze). I learned that lesson two years ago while updating from Gutsy to Hardy ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Karmic the first time I set my eyes on it since it solved some hair pulling issues with previous Ubuntu which were being able to remove tap pad = double click and WiFi which always jumped on while I disabled that in my BIOS. I had one issue once when my screen was completely disabled but that was when I was trying an Alpha version so can&#8217;t blame anyone (although maybe Asus).</p><p>Also I never do an update but do a simple clean install on another partition on my quad boot machine (2 Ubuntu, 2 very old Windoze). I learned that lesson two years ago while updating from Gutsy to Hardy ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3257</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3257</guid> <description>First, I  a fan of this blog but I strogly disagree with your view. You pose the question and dismiss it on less than full info.I answered the famous pll within 24 hours of fresh installing Karmic over Intrepid.I gave it a generally thumbs-up. But 2 weeks later I&#039;ve completely revised my opinion to worst version I&#039;ve used. You completely neglected to mention the huge number of people having connection issues after both Install &amp; Upgrade. Broadcom which used to work in Intrepid, stopped working. Same for Huawei 3G modem which also worked flawlessly a year ago. So at a drop, thousands of people lost their ability  to connect, the single most vital aspect of the OS. And...these problems were know prior to release, but the date was more important than the experience. More people found their laptop external display setup no longer working as previously (I had to run a script at every startup, startups which also are far more frequent than previously). Nautilus also has a serious bug (folders hanging after transferring large files into them) .That&#039;s the Vista problem in a nutshell. Schedule over users.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I  a fan of this blog but I strogly disagree with your view. You pose the question and dismiss it on less than full info.</p><p>I answered the famous pll within 24 hours of fresh installing Karmic over Intrepid.I gave it a generally thumbs-up.<br /> But 2 weeks later I&#8217;ve completely revised my opinion to worst version I&#8217;ve used. You completely neglected to mention the huge number of people having connection issues after both Install &amp; Upgrade. Broadcom which used to work in Intrepid, stopped working. Same for Huawei 3G modem which also worked flawlessly a year ago.<br /> So at a drop, thousands of people lost their ability  to connect, the single most vital aspect of the OS. And&#8230;these problems were know prior to release, but the date was more important than the experience.<br /> More people found their laptop external display setup no longer working as previously (I had to run a script at every startup, startups which also are far more frequent than previously). Nautilus also has a serious bug (folders hanging after transferring large files into them) .</p><p>That&#8217;s the Vista problem in a nutshell. Schedule over users.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HÃ©lder</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3238</link> <dc:creator>HÃ©lder</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3238</guid> <description>I tried it and it&#039;s faster than Jaunty. But I had some issues with it: - Conky doesn&#039;t load at startup (no mather how I put it in the startup applications); - I had to put my password everytime I wish to use CPU scale applet (boring) and two times when I wanted to change proxy definitions; - I had a flash plugin issue in firefox that I was unable to fix; So I&#039;m back for jaunty, and I&#039;m please with it. I really hope that Lucid will have all those issues fixed!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it and it&#8217;s faster than Jaunty. But I had some issues with it:<br /> - Conky doesn&#8217;t load at startup (no mather how I put it in the startup applications);<br /> - I had to put my password everytime I wish to use CPU scale applet (boring) and two times when I wanted to change proxy definitions;<br /> - I had a flash plugin issue in firefox that I was unable to fix;<br /> So I&#8217;m back for jaunty, and I&#8217;m please with it. I really hope that Lucid will have all those issues fixed!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: GrowMap</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3234</link> <dc:creator>GrowMap</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3234</guid> <description>The latest version does not work well - or possibly at all - with older monitors so if you are currently using an older monitor I do not recommend upgrading. I have issues with two different monitors - one works until you log-in and is then blank and the other apparently finally got recognized and the driver refused to allow an increased resolution.I plugged in three monitors until I found one that works - sort-of. The &quot;correct&quot; driver would not allow an increased resolution to anything reasonable. The second monitor went blank on this PC too (and stays blank after logging in even when returned to the original PC which has not been upgraded yet). No idea why.The blank monitor reset the driver and this monitor worked but the edges of the text were all missing. A new borrowed monitor reset it again and now the text is tiny but at least it is all there. Moral: only go to Koala if you have a late model monitor.Reading that Pidgin and GIMP are being removed is a major setback for me as I use them both daily. WHY would they want to remove these two major programs? What can we do about it? Can they still be manually installed (at great difficulty for even users like me who use PCs all day every day and have for decades) or are they going to be gone forever?Has Ubuntu ever considered doing LESS updates? Most of us USE PCs to accomplish tasks and would rather not deal with all these time-consuming challenges so often. Do we really need updates every six months? Couldn&#039;t we make them annual or even once every couple of years and focus on stability and less bugs? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest version does not work well &#8211; or possibly at all &#8211; with older monitors so if you are currently using an older monitor I do not recommend upgrading. I have issues with two different monitors &#8211; one works until you log-in and is then blank and the other apparently finally got recognized and the driver refused to allow an increased resolution.</p><p>I plugged in three monitors until I found one that works &#8211; sort-of. The &#8220;correct&#8221; driver would not allow an increased resolution to anything reasonable. The second monitor went blank on this PC too (and stays blank after logging in even when returned to the original PC which has not been upgraded yet). No idea why.</p><p>The blank monitor reset the driver and this monitor worked but the edges of the text were all missing. A new borrowed monitor reset it again and now the text is tiny but at least it is all there. Moral: only go to Koala if you have a late model monitor.</p><p>Reading that Pidgin and GIMP are being removed is a major setback for me as I use them both daily. WHY would they want to remove these two major programs? What can we do about it? Can they still be manually installed (at great difficulty for even users like me who use PCs all day every day and have for decades) or are they going to be gone forever?</p><p>Has Ubuntu ever considered doing LESS updates? Most of us USE PCs to accomplish tasks and would rather not deal with all these time-consuming challenges so often. Do we really need updates every six months? Couldn&#8217;t we make them annual or even once every couple of years and focus on stability and less bugs?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3230</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3230</guid> <description>lorijt Hi all I wandered here via the blurb on Yahoo. I am a brand new Ubuntu user. I started with Karmic beta then did a fresh install of the final release. When I first installed the beta I went to the ubuntu forum to say how happy I was with it it just worked out of the box. The fresh install went on another machine the only problem  I had was an older ATI vid card and ATI was no help.  If I wasn&#039;t using blender I probably wouldn&#039;t have noticed because every thing looked great but blender wouldn&#039;t run. Ineeded the #D accelerators for the card. I just replaced the card with the Invidea card from the other machine. Every thing works great. I am one happy Ubuntu user haven&#039;t turned the XP on in a week or two now.You are right the Happy ones don&#039;t vote. Where is a good one of those poles I&#039;ll go add my 2 cents to it.Lori (one happy nubee)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lorijt<br /> Hi all I wandered here via the blurb on Yahoo. I am a brand new Ubuntu user. I started with Karmic beta then did a fresh install of the final release. When I first installed the beta I went to the ubuntu forum to say how happy I was with it it just worked out of the box. The fresh install went on another machine the only problem  I had was an older ATI vid card and ATI was no help.  If I wasn&#8217;t using blender I probably wouldn&#8217;t have noticed because every thing looked great but blender wouldn&#8217;t run. Ineeded the #D accelerators for the card. I just replaced the card with the Invidea card from the other machine. Every thing works great. I am one happy Ubuntu user haven&#8217;t turned the XP on in a week or two now.</p><p>You are right the Happy ones don&#8217;t vote. Where is a good one of those poles I&#8217;ll go add my 2 cents to it.</p><p>Lori (one happy nubee)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3190</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3190</guid> <description>I&#039;ve installed it on 4 machines and it&#039;s running great. One machine was a brand new Dell  laptop, from which we wiped Windows7 after 5 minutes of flirtation with it.The other three were: some obscure Japanese laptop brand called Hassee with Intel graphics, a 10 year old Dell Inspiron 4000 with ATI graphics card that is supported for 2D graphics only and a custom built desktop with an nVidia graphics card.I&#039;m stunned by how robustly these systems are preforming and their repsective users - parents, friends, colleagues - are contacting me far less often with questions than when they were running Windows. I&#039;m considering taking it to my local school next.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve installed it on 4 machines and it&#8217;s running great. One machine was a brand new Dell  laptop, from which we wiped Windows7 after 5 minutes of flirtation with it.</p><p>The other three were: some obscure Japanese laptop brand called Hassee with Intel graphics, a 10 year old Dell Inspiron 4000 with ATI graphics card that is supported for 2D graphics only and a custom built desktop with an nVidia graphics card.</p><p>I&#8217;m stunned by how robustly these systems are preforming and their repsective users &#8211; parents, friends, colleagues &#8211; are contacting me far less often with questions than when they were running Windows. I&#8217;m considering taking it to my local school next.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guest</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3087</link> <dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3087</guid> <description>Well,  7inale is sold a second time to the User, as Vista was sold for years as a Beta, how about that?I think looking at all the new features Koala brings along, it is quite no surprise some Systems may have a problem or 2.  For me, 9.10 is the best Ubuntu ever and is working here now for 3 weeks without any problems!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well,  7inale is sold a second time to the User, as Vista was sold for years as a Beta, how about that?</p><p>I think looking at all the new features Koala brings along, it is quite no surprise some Systems may have a problem or 2.  For me, 9.10 is the best Ubuntu ever and is working here now for 3 weeks without any problems!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: l2afa</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3083</link> <dc:creator>l2afa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3083</guid> <description>Well, When I upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10 everything was going cool, but a week after that start having problems with my ALC1200, I can&#039;t find my solution, then I choose to make a clean install, and I got a few days with it. Everything is going awesome, better than when I upgrade my system, ALC1200 still working, no bugs yet... And I recommend make a clean installation, always better.Ubuntu Karmic = Windows Vista?That is a really offense to me; I am not a Linux lover, but I use it; got Win 7 since 2 months ago, Ubuntu 9.10 and Sabayon 5. And always we are using Ubuntu, because faster, simple, nice, clean, internet works much better. The only thing I use in Windows is iTunes for my iPhone and that for the jailbrake... Even my daugther 2 years old know how to put games on Ubuntu...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, When I upgrade from 9.04 to 9.10 everything was going cool, but a week after that start having problems with my ALC1200, I can&#8217;t find my solution, then I choose to make a clean install, and I got a few days with it. Everything is going awesome, better than when I upgrade my system, ALC1200 still working, no bugs yet&#8230; And I recommend make a clean installation, always better.</p><p>Ubuntu Karmic = Windows Vista?</p><p>That is a really offense to me; I am not a Linux lover, but I use it; got Win 7 since 2 months ago, Ubuntu 9.10 and Sabayon 5. And always we are using Ubuntu, because faster, simple, nice, clean, internet works much better. The only thing I use in Windows is iTunes for my iPhone and that for the jailbrake&#8230; Even my daugther 2 years old know how to put games on Ubuntu&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: LycanWarrior</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3050</link> <dc:creator>LycanWarrior</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3050</guid> <description>Well to be totally honest, I think some of the comment&#039;s made are true. You get good and bad with any Ubuntu/Linux release, but they are improving all the time.Saying bad thing&#039;s about Windows normally get&#039;s ignored or shelved. Talking about Open Source is a different matter. Open Source need&#039;s reviews like this one to allow all of us to look at what we think is wrong and work on getting it right. Canonical has so far done a great job in making Ubuntu known. The community is doing a great job of making Ubuntu improve. Without &quot;Truthful&quot; reviews though we will see no advances.I&#039;m happy with Karmic it was the final coffin nail in my Windows system&#039;s. A few initial &quot;quirks&quot; but all easily fixed (guess I&#039;m lucky)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well to be totally honest, I think some of the comment&#8217;s made are true. You get good and bad with any Ubuntu/Linux release, but they are improving all the time.</p><p>Saying bad thing&#8217;s about Windows normally get&#8217;s ignored or shelved. Talking about Open Source is a different matter. Open Source need&#8217;s reviews like this one to allow all of us to look at what we think is wrong and work on getting it right. Canonical has so far done a great job in making Ubuntu known. The community is doing a great job of making Ubuntu improve. Without &#8220;Truthful&#8221; reviews though we will see no advances.</p><p>I&#8217;m happy with Karmic it was the final coffin nail in my Windows system&#8217;s. A few initial &#8220;quirks&#8221; but all easily fixed (guess I&#8217;m lucky)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin Wildam</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3043</link> <dc:creator>Martin Wildam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3043</guid> <description>It has been about two weeks now since the release and the first wave of updates has passed. I had to do a firmware update to my mobile internet stick to fix some annoyances I had with the mobile internet connection.Now I am pretty happy - At the moment I have nothing to complain. Everything works reliable and I have my doubts that Microsoft would ever be able to deliver their first service pack within two weeks after release...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been about two weeks now since the release and the first wave of updates has passed. I had to do a firmware update to my mobile internet stick to fix some annoyances I had with the mobile internet connection.</p><p>Now I am pretty happy &#8211; At the moment I have nothing to complain. Everything works reliable and I have my doubts that Microsoft would ever be able to deliver their first service pack within two weeks after release&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guillermo MacBeath</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3040</link> <dc:creator>Guillermo MacBeath</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/is-karmic-koala-ubuntus-vista/#comment-3040</guid> <description>Well I installed 9.10 on my Frankenstein Satellite Laptop, it had become a pain using XP on it (doubt it could even run Vista or 7) with forced formating every 2 weeks. I&#039;ve been running Karmic for a week flawlessly, I even managed to connect my Vista laptop with the 9.10 one, whereast it took me 2 hours to set a network which could work between XP and Vista, took me 10 minutes in 9.10, it was specially frustrating to prevent my XP from updating to SP3 where it is impossible to set a sharing network between &#039;em. Been able to run such an eye candy OS with a mere 2.0Ghz Centrino with 512MB is awesome. Last ubuntu I used was 7.10 a few years ago, and the speed in wich ubuntu evolves, simply overshadows completely Microsoft, or any other major OS. Kudos to Canonical</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I installed 9.10 on my Frankenstein Satellite Laptop, it had become a pain using XP on it (doubt it could even run Vista or 7) with forced formating every 2 weeks. I&#8217;ve been running Karmic for a week flawlessly, I even managed to connect my Vista laptop with the 9.10 one, whereast it took me 2 hours to set a network which could work between XP and Vista, took me 10 minutes in 9.10, it was specially frustrating to prevent my XP from updating to SP3 where it is impossible to set a sharing network between &#8216;em. Been able to run such an eye candy OS with a mere 2.0Ghz Centrino with 512MB is awesome. Last ubuntu I used was 7.10 a few years ago, and the speed in wich ubuntu evolves, simply overshadows completely Microsoft, or any other major OS. Kudos to Canonical</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 511/515 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.omgubuntu.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 10:41:51 -->
