See What’s New in Unity 5.0

If you’re easily excited you might want to sit down.

The latest version of Ubuntu’s Unity Interface – version 5.0 – has landed in Ubuntu 12.04  - and it comes with a number of nifty new features.

Unity 5.0

Unity 5.0 feels far more responsive than previous iterations; opening windows, transitions etc all seem ‘snappy’. This makes sense; Unity developer Didier Roche says that one of the goals of Unity 5.0 is to ’increase quality, precision’. I would agree that they’ve done that and more: Unity 5.0 feels very fluid in use.

Visual fixes have also been applied to the Dash resulting in a more consistent overall look.

Elsewhere, the ‘Ubuntu Button’ (AKA ‘bfb’) now has a quicklist for jumping to Lenses: -

unity quicklist

Quicklists now display the application name in bold, and the ‘Keep/Remove to launcher’ phrasing has been changed to ‘lock/unlock to launcher‘: -

When launching an application the Ubuntu App Menu displays for several seconds before fading away. This, it’s hoped, will help those users who previously had trouble finding the ‘hidden’ menus. The duration of the fade in/out can be configured from the CompizConfig Settings Manager application.

CCSM also lets you add a ‘Show Desktop’ button to the Launcher. Clicking this minimizes all applications.

Unity Show Desktop

With the desktop in focus the Top Bar now displays ‘Ubuntu Desktop’.

Dragging a running application to the trash quits it (and also unlocks the app from the launcher if applicable).

If you’re fed up with the Unity Dash and Launcher picking its colour from your desktop wallpaper you can override it via the CCSM and set your own colour preference.

Colorful Dash

On Precise? You can help test Unity 5.0 by adding the Unity Team PPA.

After upgrading to Unity 5.0 you will find a ‘Unity Testing Tool’ on your Launcher. If have 30 mins to spare you should run this to help provide feedback on Unity to the developers.

Related posts:

  1. Thunderbird Unity Launcher extension available to Ubuntu 11.04 64bit, more users
  2. Intellihide added to Unity Launcher
  3. Ubuntu Unity launcher won’t be ‘moveable’
Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • Matheus Ligabue

    You can test it in oneiric, too, via this PPA:  ppa:unity-team/staging

    CAUTION: I’ve heard things may break once in a while.

    • Alois Janíček

       It break telepathy-indicator ;)

  • http://twitter.com/alexwifi64 Àlex Wifi

    nice! now what i wanna see is more polish on the light and icon themes and more integration of third party apps

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

      And don’t forget the sound theme!

  • Camilio Feliciano

    What is the wallpapeer in the video?

  • Anonymous

    I hope we will be able to get back tht BFB in the corner (yes, this THE MAJOR ERGONOMY ERROR in Unity :  The only OS to not have is main button in a corner). More of that the BFB isn’t easiest to find in his actual place (according to caonocal design team usability test), so why don’t get it back ? We must look our cursor to click the BFB, we needn’t in 11.04 ! This is stupid no ?

    Please, if a designer read this, please just answer : Will the BFB stay there or be moveable (or moved) !

    • Anonymous

      Yes. I would like this to! Please. 

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

      Don’t think it will happen for two reasons. One is that user testing was done and found that people wanted a larger, more 3D-looking BFB than when it was in the panel. Also, I think Mark Shuttleworth said before that a reason for not allowing the launcher to move to other sides of the screen was that it always needed to be next to the BFB; now that it is in the launcher, this would make more customization possible (like in a certain Unity mod that already exists).

      • Anonymous

        user testing since then showed that people were just as or more confused now

    • Ian Santopietro

      OS X doesn’t have an important menu in a corner. Spotlight is too slow to be super useful as a launcher, and the Apple Menu is more like the device menu (Ubuntu’s gear in the upper right)

      And, the usability tests found that people didn’t know the BFB was clickable when it was in the corner. They wanted to click the Home Folder icon instead.

      • Anonymous

        user testing since then showed they are no less confused now, and in fact they are now confused between the launcher and the dash.
        Simple logic about new users should make comparisons of dash and a menu, and where is a button for the applications menu on operating systems usually at… the corner, and always visible. i don’t see how something that is always visible in a prominent corner spot with the freaking logo on it is more confusing than something in the same place and status as a favorite application icon, one that disappears all the time. not only is it just as visually confusing, but it logically takes away a lot of functionality and leaves no functionality for the top left corner. they should AT LEAST make clicking at the top left trigger closing a window. right now it’s just a big fat useless clunky poop corner.

        this is a quote about november’s usability testing….
        “The first issue is that, despite the contentious move of the BFB from the top panel to the Launcher, users still seem unaware of how to open the Dash.
        But when it is shown to them its relevance is questioned. “What’s the difference between the dash and the launcher?” one tester asked. And they have a point…”-http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/user-testing-of-unity-reveals-some-surprising-results/

    • Anonymous

      Not going to happen. 

    • Satchit Bhogle

      At some point (likely 12.10), the Launcher will be able to be moved out of the box. To be able to move the launcher, you have to be able to move the BFB.  You can’t have both, a BFB in the corner AND a moveable launcher.

      • Anonymous

        Why can’t the panel shrink and the launcher expand to full height?

        • Georgi Karavasilev

          And that would create yet another UX problem: If the panel shrinks (hides), the indicators will dissappear :/

          • Anonymous

            I don’t mean hiding it, I mean make the panel physically shorter. (e.g the width of the panel would be screen-width minus launcher width)

          • Georgi Karavasilev

            That’s a good idea, BUT it might creates inconcistency “a la Nautilus 3″ (that right sided toolbar is killing me)

        • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

          It can, set the display to netbook and it will

    • Anonymous

      man this is vital +10000

    • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

      I run Ubuntu and have my ‘button’ in the same place as Windows has since WIn95…..

  • Anonymous

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE Canonical, allow us to keep the menus permanently visible. The code is already there. It’s just a checkbox away. I promise I’ll start evangelizing Ubuntu again.

    • Anonymous

      Maybe you can set the fading time for a year or sth? ;)

      • Jonathan Welzel

        lmao wouldn’t that be neat?

        • Anonymous

          Yeah I could see setting up a system for a newb, setting the menu to persistent for one year, and then a year from now, I get a phone call – “My menu disappeared!!”

          • Joaquin Padilla Rivero

            Make it 10 years.

          • Thomas Holt

            or a 100 :) Thought i would continue the large comment pole

          • http://twitter.com/thomas_vandeven Thomas Vandeven

            make it over 9000 years

          • Anonymous

            Edit: oh Thomas beat me :(

          • http://twitter.com/marcusklaas MarcusKlaasDeVries

            which one?

    • http://www.corbindavenport.com/ Corbin Davenport

      I really want this as well. Would it be so difficult to add a checkbox do do this?

      • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

         No. It would be very easy. It’s just one of those things that should be done, but aren’t important enough to get priority. So go right ahead.

        • http://www.corbindavenport.com/ Corbin Davenport

          If I knew anything about Compiz I would fix it myself. But I only know HTML5, CSS3, and a little JavaScript.

          • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

            Only, thats not a bad skillset dude ;)

          • http://www.corbindavenport.com/ Corbin Davenport

            Thanks :)

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000678236470 Hans Heintze

        There will be an option to have standard in-window app menus in precice BTW.

        The canoncial design team have stated that unity was never supposed to
        be so unconfigurable, but had to be due to limited resources, since this
        is now “a checkbox away” I think there’s a very real chance of this
        happening as well.

        • Anonymous

          After than Mark Shuttleworth many times stated that it indeed was supposed and is supposed to be unconfigurable. He said if it was up to him, there wouldn’t be so many options in CCSM.

          • https://launchpad.net/~afccarl1994 Carl Ansell

            Maybe thats because half of the options in CCSM break everything.

          • Georgi Karavasilev

            Right, which option in “Ubuntu Unity Plugin” breaks everything?

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

       That is obviously allowed. It always has been. You just need to deactivate global menus. It would be nice with a clean GUI for it, but it isn’t being denied. Also, please remember that Canonical doesn’t have to do this. Anyone can.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000678236470 Hans Heintze

        There will be an option to have standard in-window app menus in precice BTW.

        The canoncial design team have stated that unity was never supposed to
        be so unconfigurable, but had to be due to limited resources. now that unity’s more developed this kind of stuff may be fixed.

      • Anonymous

        I thought I was obviously referring to global menu not being hidden…

    • Anonymous

      Agreed, I moved back to Windows 7 until this mess gets sorted out. This fading is even worse than old instant hiding, it’s like saying “neeneer here’s the menu, OH YOU WANT IT, F**K YOU, WE’LL FADE IT AWAY HAHAHAAH!”

      • Waldir Leôncio

        There’s no need to move all the way back to W7 just because of a menu. Disabling the global menu is one terminal command away (http://www.addictivetips.com/ubuntu-linux-tips/how-to-disable-global-menu-in-ubuntu-11-10-tip/ ). Another thing you could do is move to any other desktop interface, such as Gnome Shell.

        • Anonymous

          I don’t want GLOBAL MENU to be removed, i want GLOBAL MENU NOT TO BE HIDDEN WHEN APPLICATION IS SELECTED. Two completely different things. So yes, Win7 is better choice, and also a lot faster. It’s amazing how responsive and fast Win7 ui is, and how badly Unity fails with this…

          • http://yourethemannowdog.com Shasta McShasta

            Nothing wrong with Windows 7, but you know that there are many different display managers than just Unity  :) 

          • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

            EXACTLY!!

          • Sashin Ranasinghe

            In my experience Ubuntu with unity is wayyy faster and more responsive than Windows 7.

          • Parry

            That may be your own experience, But on this same desktop, I had Win7 before. Moved to Ubuntu 10.04, went up the increments, reached 11.10 and moved to Xfce [which still went sluggish for some reason so I freshed Xubuntu on it and it worked faster]
            Point? Ubuntu with Unity slowed things WAYY down in my own experience.

          • Anonymous

            Windows 7′s UI is a confusing mess compared to Unity.

          • Miguel Cóias

            Have you ever seen your nickname? Don’t troll us

            Openbox rules, I’m not using Ubuntu until they bring Ubuntu Classic desktop back. #! user now.

          • Parry

            No. No it’s not.

          • http://openid-provider.appspot.com/delanayeb Bertrand

            The worst thing would be their start menu! Try to find the solitaire in there (without typing it in the search field) or a few other programs on submenus… Start menu is a terrible mess, not intuitive, not sorted logically, not efficient, just useless.

            Had to configure pre-installed W7 for the new laptop of an acquaintance lately (and thus used it for the first time) and was really disappointed with the whole thing after all the buzz around it.

            Not even close to Unity or Gnome-Shell.

          • Anonymous

            In reply to Bertrand… sure! Start -> Games -> Solitaire. Gosh, now wasn’t that difficult? It’s also a very nice Solitaire :).

          • Jean-Philippe Green

            You want a global menu, but don’t want it to be hidden? Because of this you switch to windows 7? I don’t really follow you.

            There is no global menu in windows7 either so it feels like this is equivalent with removing the global menu in Ubuntu. Not saying that win7 is bad, but I don’t follow your logic.

          • Anonymous

            Some people I feel, don’t quite “get” what actually makes it worthwhile using Linux. Historically the GUI has never been one of those things, but I’d say it has caught up now for the most part.

            As far as logic goes, I think he just wants his menu to be visible… global or not (personally it doesn’t bother me).

            Lastly, in direct response to h4lly. Funny how the video made a point of talking about how the developers have focused on responsiveness for this next release. So unless you’re making that judgement on this version specifically, you may as well wait and see.

            Windows 7 is very responsive though :D.

          • Anonymous

            Seems like you just like Win7 and you’re using this nitpick as an excuse to use Win7.

            There are multiple user interfaces available for Linux systems. KDE can even be made to behave like the Win7 UI with minimal, easy customization if you like that (use smoothtasks plugin).

            That yields the question: why were you using Ubuntu in the first place?

            If you preferred the system as a whole to Windows, then there would be no reason to switch OS. Your behaviour suggests that you may have preferred the UI. But then the old UI didn’t have a global menu.

            I can imagine reasons why you would choose Win7. But your comment is currently irrational and .. baitworthy :P

            That said, I have no speed issues on my old laptop (which also has Win7 that I really very rarely use) — but I’m not using Unity (and the new compiz with performance regressions).

          • Anonymous

            I’m one of these users who were perfectly happy with Ubuntu through 8.04 to 10.04, and behold, then came Unity and Gnome3, and  Linux on desktop was dead.. Now I’m bitter and angry for the current Linux desktop situation.

          • Anonymous

            I’d just like to make a very childish comment  (nevertheless one I believe in) and point out that KDE looks like rubbish. Unless they work out their issues in the presentation department I’m afraid I’d be too embarrassed to be seen using it. For fear of looking like a tasteless nerd. Sorry to anyone offended >_>.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_K5QKO4IBJBEYABKBGA7DSA4S6E Cédric

            Good, rest with windows seven, i’m always happy when users that don’t understand free software go back to shit.

          • Anonymous

            Absolutely this is reason I can’t leave Linux even if I want to.

          • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/7GXJ4CL5A6A5YPPUO47UQXGP5Y Johan

            “understand free software”. Patronizing much? If you have to ask of your users to understand a philosophy to be happy with an operating system, you have failed.

          • Sashin Ranasinghe

            Sounds like you upgraded instead of installed from scratch, or your experience must be an isolated case. Ubuntu has been faster than Windows for me on multiple computers…

          • Anonymous

            In response to your comment about the DE situation… how the hell can you be bitter and angry with the choice available to you? There’s literally a project heading in every direction imaginable… Of course if GUI matters most to you and you like Windows 7, by all means use it. I do (on and off). I don’t think there’s anything to be ashamed of in that. Something much of the Linux community needs to grow up and accept.

          • Ian Santopietro

            You know, Windows doesn’t have a global menu either.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000678236470 Hans Heintze

        There will be an option to have standard in-window app menus in precice BTW.

      • Arkadi Viner

        LOL

      • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

        Why not use KDE or Gnome, pretty poor excuse to change the whole OS.

      • Daniel Waller

        I don’t really see the reason why people are bitching about this so much…it would just take one mention (on the installer slideshows for example or in a default noob walkthrough of ubuntus main features on first startup) and the “problem” would be done with

    • Freddi

      There is a buggy feature: KEEP  F10  PRESSED !!!

      F10 gives focus to the menu, pressing it long will not open a menu dropdown, but keep the menu visible for a long time. Unfortunately this feature needs fixing:
      - the menu shows a highlighted menu item with so-called “sliding doors”. This should not happen.
      - the menu disappears again with the next time you click a menu item. It does not persist during your whole work.

      Especially for menu-heavy applications like Gimp, this improves work efficiency. Not all applications have been designed only for Unity and menus aren’t that much evil.

      • Anonymous

        For me F10 opens settings of one of the indicators I have.

      • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

        Does noting here in LXDE :)

    • Michael da cova

      use ubuntu tweak http://ubuntu-tweak.com/

      • Anonymous

        Can you explain how will it allow the global menu to stay visible all time?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000678236470 Hans Heintze

      There will be an option to have standard in-window app menus in precice BTW.
      The canoncial design team have stated that unity was never supposed to be so unconfigurable, but had to be due to limited resources, since this is now “a checkbox away” I think there’s a very real chance of this happening as well.

      • Anonymous

        OK, to disambiguate my position once and for all:

        1. I _do_ know I can opt-out of Global Menu and use in-window menus.

        2. I happen to like Global Menu (I’m mostly a Mac user lately, for a number of accidental reasons, not my choice.)

        3. I find it ridiculous that the Global Menu is hiding. It’s like Canonical is ashamed to use that user interface thing called “application menu” they say is “awkward” (sic).

        4. I’m asking to stop that ridiculous policy, and now that they’re allowing us to see the menu for up to 10 sec, just do one of two things: put a checkbox there to allow the menu to stay visible all the time, or allow for an absurdly long “menu discovery” time as others have joked about here. One year is fine with me. :-)

    • Will Kromer

      You can in Unity 5.0 as of right now.

      • Anonymous

        How? The CCSM interface only allows for 10 sec “menu discovery” time.

    • https://launchpad.net/~davidraid David Raid

      Add a bug or blueprint to the Unity Launchpad.

    • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

      Could just remove global menu and your apps will get the menu in the old style..

      • Anonymous

        But I like the global menu. I just hate it hiding away for no reason…

        • Ian Santopietro

          Then you _don’t_ like the global menu?

      • Simon Strandman

        But then you’ll have a top panel that you can’t do anything with, just wasting space.

        • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

          Make it autohide if possible…

    • Anonymous

       You can have it permanently visible.  Just open Compiz Manager, and set the hide launcher setting to ‘Never’

      Simples!

      • Anonymous

        Or I could just as well install KDE or Windows. Neither of the three solutions would make APP MENUS in UNITY become permanently visible… ;-)

  • Joern Konopka

    Custom Colored Dash == Pure WIN!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001964318220 Braulio Lima

      Movable Unity Dash + Custom Colored Dash = Epic WIN!

      • Charlie Pandacan

        …+ unity dash drop shadow + labeled mission control…

      • Anonymous

        WRONG.

        Movable Unity Dash + Custom Colored Dash = OVER 9000!!!!!!!

  • http://profiles.google.com/krnekhelesh Nekhelesh Ramananthan

    Looks great! I am looking forward to the multimonitor support and the improved and polished theme shown in the mockups before. They look really pretty.

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

       Things are already improving. For instance, I use a horisontal and a vertical monitor, both in 1080p resolution. In Unity 4.24, the workspace switcher was completely unusable. In 5.0, it’s perfect. Other things are improving as well, though there are still lots of issues.

  • Anonymous

    “If you’re fed up with the Unity Dash and Launcher picking its colour
    from your desktop wallpaper you can override it via the CCSM and set
    your own colour preference.” – Nice. I will be able to change to not-almost-black wallpaper then at last. :)

  • http://www.corbindavenport.com/ Corbin Davenport

    The only thing I don’t like about Unity is the menu bar. I want it to be at the top of the screen (e.g, like Mac OS X) and always visible. But now, it’s either sometimes visible or on each individual window. Does anyone know if the developers are working on this, of if you can use Ubuntu Tweak or similar software?

    • Ian Santopietro

      You might be able to set the menu fade timeout to a year or something like that. Then, when you open an app, the menu shows up and simply doesn’t go away.

      • http://www.corbindavenport.com/ Corbin Davenport

        I was thinking that same thing, but I couldn’t tell by the video if that was possible.

      • Anonymous

        Not possible via CCSM (max=10 sec). Is there a command line that would allow that?

  • http://openid-provider.appspot.com/TheMerkinman Merk

    In before Unity/GNOME Shell infighting and people complaining to Canonical about something GNOME dropped (the 2.X panels)

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

       Gnome has not dropped the panels. Neither has Ubuntu. They are still available, and in the repositories. You now have to press alt to access the right-click menu and to move applets, and applets are grouped to the left, center or right. Other than that, it’s the same panels.  You can also use Gnome Panel with Unity if you want to. Not a problem at all.

      Please stop spreading these rumors. You are participating in the removal of software you don’t want removed. Just install and use it. http://apt.ubuntu.com/p/gnome-session-fallback. Nobody will support it if everyone thinks that nobody wants it, and nobody will want it if everyone says it’s been dropped. It hasn’t. Yet. And there’s no real reason why it won’t still be usable ten years from now. If people want it.

      • http://openid-provider.appspot.com/TheMerkinman Merk

        What rumor? GNOME has deprecated the 2.X panels in favor of GNOME Shell and the 3.X panels. A rumor, if any, is that eventually even the 3.X panels would be deprecated as they are only for people that lack the hardware to run GNOME Shell, but I didn’t mention that in my initial message simply because it may not be the case.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_U3ODPMXX3GTMLT3TP5N6JRWX5M nicholas

    Good you can configure it using CCSM
    I do sooooooo hope that Compiz permanence picks up in Precise

  • Anonymous

    If Possible, Cannonical.
    Can you also put highlight on how to find newly installed APPS

    sometime it’s a pain to go look for new install apps

    • Ian Santopietro

      I hear that newly installed apps will be added to the launcher by default now.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

        I use 12.04 and I can tell you that this is already implemented and released.

  • http://twitter.com/gustavokrm Gustavo K. Rodrigues

    Something that has always bugged me on Unity was the fact that one needs to click on “Filter results” to have access to the apps filtered into categories. I have seen some of my relatives and the first thing they do is basically wander through the launcher first trying to find everything, not paying attention / realising they had to click the dash launcher to find things. The dash launcher basically hides itself amongst the many other buttons there, making it very unintuitive to users that they should click there first.

    It would be better, somehow, if the launcher were by default hidden and would show itself only when you click the dash launcher or place the mouse cursor on the left edge of the screen. This would force users to realise they should always start by clicking the dash button..

    An alternative would be the launcher hidden by default and filling itself with the open apps AWN style, instead of having it always filled with apps. Then, as the user becomes more used to the interface, he could “lock” applications to the launcher.

    Another problem that I think Canonical should fix is how things basically do not fit when you have a solid top menu and a translucid launcher. I’m talking about aesthetics here. It just doesn’t fit to me. There should be some sort of translucence on the top bar when, say, no window was active / after logging in. Then, when a window is active, the top bar could become solid. But then comes other problem – for me, let’s keep it clear – is that when one launches an application – say Empathy – and it is not filling the screen, one should still go with the mouse all the way up there to access the menu.. Shouldn’t they keep the menus within the window when the application isn’t maximized?

    The concept behind Unity is good but it needs more polishing and more research in my opinion..

    • Georgi Karavasilev

      “Another problem that I think Canonical should fix is how things basically do not fit when you have a solid top menu and a translucid launcher. I’m talking about aesthetics here. It just doesn’t fit to me. There should be some sort of translucence on the top bar when, say, no window was active / after logging in. Then, when a window is active, the top bar could become solid.”
      Fixed in Unity 5.0, thanks for Marco Trevisian :) To activate it check the tick the checkbox “Panel opacity for maximized windows toogle” in CCSM -> Ubuntu Unity Plugin -> Experimental :)

    • dakira

      The first point you make is where most of my “usibility victims” fail. Out of 20 people (who have and haven’t used Ubuntu before) 20 told me they had real big problems finding apps. To NONE of them it occured, that “filter results” would lead them to app categories.

  • Igor Bozato

    What about a revamp in the  notifications system, notifcations works a way better in Gnome Shell. Is the only thing I miss in Unity

    • http://twitter.com/Sephiroth_VII NCLI

      I think Ubuntu’s notification are great for most things, but for chat, GS is definitely superior.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

        I love how GNOME Shell’s chat notifications let me IM my friends while watching fullscreen YouTube videos. This is not possible in Unity, AFAIK; you either have to stop the video or watch it in the window.

    • Anonymous

      Yes I really believe that Canonical hasn’t made any major changes or feature upgrades to their notification system. I am not sure if there are any changes under the hood but there are not changes with respect to usability or customization. 

    • Anonymous

      They are better in 12.04. 

      • Anonymous

        In what way (I’m not using 12.04)?

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

       You should explain why. I have absolutely no idea what could be improved in the notification system, for instance. What are the issues?

  • http://profiles.google.com/jfmessier Jean-Francois Messier

    Maybe it’s me, but the ONE thing that annoys me the most is that I cannot easily start two instances of a given application, be it a shell, Nautilus or any other. If I click on the icon of Nautilus and it’s already opened, it will just focus on the window of the actually opened Nautilus, instead of opening one.There should be an option so that I can decide whether I will switch focus to an existing instance of an application or open a new one. For now, I have to right-click and elect “Open in a new window”. If someone knows another way to easily start a second instance of a program, let me know. Using Ctrl-click on the icon would be an acceptable compromise.

    • Georgi Karavasilev

      Middle click on the icons does wonders :)
      P.S. Left click is reserved for “Scale” when there are two or more copies of an app that are not minimized :P

      • Anonymous

        That was NEAT!

    • Satchit Bhogle

      a) Why do you need a second instance? The vast majority of applications do not need a second instance as they have tabs, including Nautilus, which you mentioned.
      b) For applications like LibreOffice, where you WILL need to start a second instance, right-clicking on the icon and clicking New Document works. Alternately, you can enter the existing instance and hit Ctrl+N.

      • http://rubenverhack.be/ Ruben Verhack

        Well I certainly have a lot of multiple nautilus windows open and multiple terminal windows open a lot of times. (And yes, it’s necessary)

        The middle-click thing is ok, but on a laptop, you don’t have a middle-click-button to start with. A simple feature would be adding this to the quicklist of nautilus and terminal.

        • http://twitter.com/rodcapaz Rodrigo Martins

          Indeed, for some tasks having tabs doesn’t make the work as fluently as multiple instances do.

          Although people find theirselves clicking on a program icon on the laucher to just focus it’s window, so, always be prompted if you want to focus the existing instance or open a new one will become very very annoying.

          Sorry, but as far as I know you can do the middle click on a laptop/notebook by simultaneously pressing the right and left mouse/touchpad buttons.

          And to open a new instance you just need to focus the current open instance of the program and press Ctrl + N.

        • Anonymous

          I love using middle click (not just for this but everywhere) so I wrote a little script to change a two-finger tap on the touchpad to be middle click. If you want it let me know, and I can post it later.

        • Leonardo Torok

          Actually, you can do a middle-click on a laptop. Just press the left ans right button at the same time.

      • Ian Santopietro

        In general I agree, but have you used nautilus with tabs before? If you have multiple windows open, you generally want to copy between the two of them tabs just don’t work for this.

        (That said, nautilus does have a nice split window feature. It’s not quite as nice as having two windows, but it’s not bad.

        • Freddi

          I easily drag and drop files from one tab to another. Ubuntu every day.

        • Satchit Bhogle

          It’s very easy to perform file transfer between Nautilus tabs. Either drag a file to the title of the second tab, where the focus will shift to the second tab and you can drop it, or you can simply do Ctrl+C, Ctrl+Tab, Ctrl+V. It’s much easier and less cluttered looking than Alt+~.

      • Anonymous

        Ad. a) the vast majority of apps you use. 50% of apps on my launcher have more than one instance open almost all the time. :)

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

       You can middle-click the icon to open a new instance. If you prefer keyboard shortcuts, then shift+super+n will open a new instance of the nth launcher entry. For instance, if Nautilus is the first entry, then pressing super+shift+1 will open a new instance of Nautilus.

  • David Ainley

    its looking good.  12.04 is going to be an exciting time, amirite?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

      If you think this is exciting, wait until 14.04! 12.04 will look every bit as old and crusty as 10.04 does now, and people will be having a fit over GNOME 4 relying on the user having a 3D holographic monitor and want to get back to the traditional GNOME Shell / Unity that “just worked”.

      Enjoy your news from the future! I better get back into my Delorean now before the Unity haters get me…

      • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

        Look isn’t really the thing, its the crusty kernel not really cutting it with new hardware imho

  • Anonymous

    Wow, I`m waiting on it since first Ubuntu release with Unity.

  • Anonymous

    Is it wise to test this in 11.10?

    • Ian Santopietro

      No.

  • http://rubenverhack.be/ Ruben Verhack

    “When launching an application the Ubuntu App Menu displays for several secondsbefore fading away. This, it’s hoped, will help those users who previously had trouble finding the ‘hidden’ menus.”
    I don’t really get this? I mean, I don’t understand what it’s about. What are the hidden menus? Thx!

    • http://rubenverhack.be/ Ruben Verhack

      Oww ok! Now I get it, nevermind ;)

    • Anonymous

      Yeah I don’t really get this either. I don’t notice anything in the video when its described as happening?

    • https://login.ubuntu.com/+id/R4szkb7 Jo-Erlend Schinstad

      Ubuntu uses the top panel to display titles and menus for applications. In Unity 4.24, applications show the title immediately, and doesn’t show the menu until you can actually use it; it’s hidden until the mouse enters the area or you use a keyboard shortcut to access them, such as F10. In Unity 5.0, the menus are displayed by default for x seconds, and then it fades back into displaying the window title.

      I don’t really think it’s sufficient. If the titlebar and menu also had a golden background color (like when you drag a window to the top, for instance), it would be much easier to notice. But I think it’s a step in the right direction.

  • Anonymous

    pls give the option to go back to GNOME-2 look. we are already tired to see unity like toolbars on windows and macos .. :/

    • http://yourethemannowdog.com Shasta McShasta

      Try XFCE or LXDE.  They’re both panel-based, like Gnome 2.  Also, MATE is a Gnome 2 fork, but I’m not sure what condition it is in while running on Ubuntu.  

  • http://my2cents4theday.blogspot.com Don Williams

    This looks great, I can’t wait until to put this on my next two upcoming new computers!

  • http://twitter.com/rodcapaz Rodrigo Martins

    Sorry, but why doesn’t Canonical released the fantastic idea of making a quick optional tutorial teaching how to do the basic tasks that is prompted when you install Ubuntu?

    Or, prompting users if they want to eable tooltips bubbles?

  • http://twitter.com/noneofthem noneofthem

    Looking great! I may actually return to Ubuntu once 12.04 is out. Currently running Crunchbang, because 11.10 gave me huge stability problems and other problems.

  • daas88

    ಠ_ಠ
    Not even remotely excited.

    • Anonymous

      Not even remotely interested in the status of your excitement.

      • daas88

        Not even remotely interested in whether you care or not about the status of my excitement.
        And so the loop begins.

        • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

          Ad infinatum

  • Gabriel Rousseau

    And about Unity 2D?? =(

    • Anonymous

      I want to know that too. My PC falls back to Unity 2d, are there any new things for any improvement to it.

  • Anonymous

    Nice, but the more i see this, the more I get excited about Linux Mint’s Cinnamon Desktop environment project..

  • Anonymous

    BFB = big f**king button?

    • Anonymous

      BFB = big FAT button lol

  • Jean-Christophe Pagès

    That’s it! I’m moving to unity!

  • Chad Germann

    Hint to Unity team People who Don’t like the vanishing menus don’t want a Compromise Give us a toggle Dispersing menues on IDEs is a BAD IDEA!! get it?

    I am going to give 12.04 a try if they don’t figure out the needs of pro users in that time I am moving to Mac

  • Bill Oldroyd

    I am growing to like Unity, running both that and Mint to compare the two of them. There are a couple of things I would like improved :

    The Dash is useful but why, once you have searched you cannot keep the results display open so that you look at more than thing without having to repeat the search. (If I am wrong and this is possible, then it’s not very clear how you do it.)

    The second thing is the concentration on icons as a mode for results presentation. It works OK for images perhaps, but I certainly am more interested in text. A vertical list of text entries would be much more useful for file names, document titles, even music and images for me. I know file names are below the icons, in small text, but the table arrangement isn’t very useful. If you use text lists the sections (applications, files, music etc.) can be side by side rather than one above the other.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eugene-Lifescale/100002549592120 Eugene Lifescale

    Just awful. OMG, Ubuntu.

    • Anonymous

      I like it. Unity is da best.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GE4EYP3QOQ246PLG2Y2DOD2NIQ Dr. Fly

    If I upgrade to this PPA, is there a safe way to remove it and return to the current version of Unity when I’m done testing it?

    • dakira

      Yes, use ppa-purge:
      sudo apt-get install ppa-purge
      sudo ppa-purge ppa:unity-team/ppa

  • Jon Arnett

    I LOVE that you can change the launcher color. I’ve been silently begging for that since 11.04!

  • Aaron Honeycutt

    Give me some customizing features and a heck lot more stability and I’ll move from GS.

  • Anthony Kiniyalocts

    Someone should totally link me this wallpaper from the video…

  • Joe Brown

    I don’t use Ubuntu (Arch Linux for me), but I enjoy coming to this website and seeing what Canonical is doing for the community.  It’s great to see them put so much emphasis on UX.  What Ubuntu has accomplished is no easy task.  Although some design decisions may be flawed, the fact that there are R&D teams (from what I’ve heard, anyway) just for UX is phenomenal.  

    This is what Linux needs to reach its potential.  Companies like Canonical (and Red Hat to an extent) who focus on UI, fonts, ease of use, etc. make it easy for people who aren’t familiar with a Unix environment to get their feet wet without bothering with all the “typing stuff” that people aren’t as accustomed to.Had Ubuntu 8.10 not been so easy to use, I would still be blissfully unaware of Linux, Free Software and the Open Source movement.  Looking back I don’t see how I ever made it without Linux.

    • Anonymous

      The main reason why it’s no easy task is because the traditional Linux community is very conservative and extremely resistant to change. The backlash and criticism are immense.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JMVDP6QGHHLZ34WQXZM53YNM2U Sulaiman スライマン

    “The latest version of Ubuntu’s Unity Interface – version 5.0 – is available for testing in Precise, and it comes with a number of new features.”

    No, thanks. I’d rather use either GNOME 3 fallback session, KDE or Xfce than using “the most hated DE in the world”. True story, even my notebook dislike it so much.

    • Aaron Honeycutt

      Not a DE, it’s a shell using the GNOME DE.

  • Anonymous

    Thx Mr. Shuttleworth now i can finally make my launcher bright pink !!!!!!1

  • Karol Orzeł

    “Quicklists now display the application name in bold, and the ‘Keep/Remove to launcher’ phrasing has been changed to ‘lock/unlock to launcher‘: ”
    Wow.. if those are main new features then i have no more question. Time to switch back to Windows and wait when I can finally make my WORK done in Ubuntu.. Jesus :/

  • Frederico Araújo Mendes

    The unity needs more configuration options and customization. The
    configuration utility must be accessible with the right mouse button. It
    should come installed by default.

    http://s7.postimage.org/fwbe4m...

    • Anonymous

      I agree here too, installed by default. Since they are going larger size disc image, space shouldn’t be a problem.

  • http://twitter.com/ux92 uvazquez

    I like Unity, but not on a desktop computer. I tried it in a 1920×1080 resolution and it sucked. But in my netbook 1024×600 it rocks. So I don’t doubt it will be great in tablets and so, but I don’t like the way it steals space from my desktop computer without significantly increasing my performance. That’s why I’m still using GNOME3 Fallback Session.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Joseph/100000615672314 Paul Joseph

      Wish there would be an option for a ‘bottom panel’.
      Just Love some aspects of Unity. Clearly futuristic. However, I hope there would be an option for a ‘bottom panel’. This is so functional for certain tasks that requires several files of a particular program. 

      Unity 5.0 can just be the answer to temporally add & remove the bottom panel on the fly. This can solve such a problematic & contentious issue. 

  • http://twitter.com/ushabtay Uri Shabtay

    i would be happy to know whats the status of Moving the Unity interface in RTL locales – such as Hebrew and Arabic languages.. 

    so far – no change or notification regarding Precise 

  • Alastair Gilfillan

    Five-point-what? Haha!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KVEONPHBR53ZYKT62BAKEKA54M adi

    Wow! So, an option to change panel colour and some changed labels. I’m… impressed.

  • Anonymous

    Good. Now make Unity 3D work on my netbook. It supports Windows Aero  and has an okay graphics chip. So Y U NO WORK UNITY!?

    That or update Unity 2D to be just as cool :D

  • http://ariona.net Rian Ariona

    what application did you use to record the  screen? i have tried to use gtkrecordmydesktop but it produce flickering when opening ubuntu menu.