The Importance Of Anonymity On The Web

Jacob Appelbaum stands on stage at Linux.conf.au 2012 to deliver the final keynote on Friday morning, patiently waiting for his introduction from the conference organizer.

In his hand he holds a smartphone, capturing a photograph of his audience which he later says he uploaded in case his phone is confiscated at the airport on his way back to the United States of America, of which he is ironically a citizen.

However this isn’t hyperbole – Appelbaum has been detained for questioning at borders many times, in fact so many times that he’s “lost count.” In July 2010, Appelbaum was detained at Newark airport where his bag was searched, receipts photocopied, laptop inspected, and his three cellphones taken never to be seen again.

Jacob Appelbaum was detained not because he’s a genuine terrorist suspect, nor because he was trying to smuggle drugs or Kinder Surprises into the USA. Appelbaum was detained because he’s fighting for freedom and anonymity on the internet, a cause that’s as important as ever in our current society, often overlooked by the media, and under appreciated by most internet users.

Appelbaum begins by sharing the story of English philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who in the late 18th century developed a concept for an institutional building where all inmates could be watched by a sole guard at all times. Called the Panopticon, Bentham himself described it as “a new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example.”

“People behave differently when they know they’re being watched,” Appelbaum says, and in the last few years it has become increasingly easier for governments to keep an eye on citizens’ behaviour, even though laws are supposed to exist to prevent a government spying on their own people. Governments get around many of these laws by simply working together to spy on one another’s citizens, and then share the information between themselves in secrecy. An example is Project Echelon.

“I’ve got nothing to hide”

On the whole, many internet users are aware of the risks when signing up to services provided by companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) have the ability to store data. Some may even know that cellphone carriers store all text (SMS) messages sent.

The awareness has been raised thanks to Wikileaks, the SOPA bill, firewalls in countries like China and now western countries (Australia and New Zealand have had firewalls for quite a while), and country-specific legislation which enables rights holders to request ISPs disconnect their customers with little proof of copyright infringement.

But when you talk with friends or family about this, the oft quoted response is “I’ve got nothing to hide” or “I’m not special.” Of course, you may not be special now, but who knows what might be considered “special” in the future?

It doesn’t take much to accidentally stumble across something you shouldn’t on the web, as Appelbaum says “it’s very easy to know someone who knows someone who’s on some government’s list.” Around the web, log files are stored with ISPs and cloud services that don’t have an expiry date. It’s easy for governments to cherry pick information that’s been collated through no fault of your own, and construct a story that fits their interest.

Appelbaum warns, “every log file stored around the world will tell a story about you. It may not be the truth, but it will be made up of facts.”

Wire-tapping is everywhere

Devices are built and shipped with tracking capability built-in and hidden deep in the firmware, ready to be activated whenever a government deems you as a person of interest. In Australia alone, Senator Scott Ludlum of the Green party in Australia told us that an astonishing 250,000 requests for metadata on individuals were filed by the Australian government last year. Metadata includes things like your location, the file name, type and size of things you’ve uploaded and downloaded but not the content, the recipients number of text messages you’ve sent but not the content, and URLs you’ve visited but again, not the content.

Because of this ‘loophole,’ governments often don’t require a court order or prior approval to make these requests and obtain this information. Their argument is that metadata isn’t important – but it is, and stories can be constructed to warrant your detainment off metadata alone.

In 2005, over one hundred Greek politicians including the Prime Minister himself had their mobile phones tapped by an unknown culprit in what became known globally as The Athens Affair. It led to the suicide of a 38 year old Electrical Engineer, caught up in a scandal that proved the dangers of mobile phone tracking software and the control it gives to not only governments, but anyone with the skill to hack it.

Censorship of the internet

Just yesterday, large sites such as Wikipedia, Google, Reddit and over 6,000 other websites including OMG! Ubuntu! ‘blacked out’ in protest of a bill with which you’re all familiar with. This morning, file sharing site Megaupload was shut down by the FBI, and the site founders arrested on piracy charges.

Appelbaum displayed slides of torproject.org blocked in countries such as Syria, Libya, Egypt, and China. That’s to be expected – the western world is acutely aware that the aforementioned nations have aggressive internet censorship in place. What might surprise you is that Appelbaum then showed slides of that same URL blocked on cellphone carriers O2 and Vodafone in the UK, and T-Mobile in the USA. Carriers that you use every day in democratic countries. Or so you thought.

“The United States is the next authoritarian state,” Senator Ludlum says, and the rest of the world needs to be aware that bills such as SOPA or PIPA will affect the world, not just the USA.

“Would you rather live under American domestic policy or American foreign policy?” Appelbaum asks, jokingly. “Well now there’s no difference.”

Self-censorship

Censorship is formed in a variety of ways. In China, a ‘spiderweb of shame’ prevents people from accessing banned websites and discourages internet users to even try. Searching for a keyword such as ‘democracy’ is very likely to enact some reaction from the authorities. In the US, legal threats are used to inspire fear in the populace.

When people know they’re being watched, their behaviour changes – and interestingly, the populace begins to censor themselves. For fear of being caught, users avoid controversial websites, avoid speaking out or joining groups to exercise their democratic right (such as Occupy or Anonymous), and stay away from anonymity networks like the Tor Project.

This simply makes it easier for the government to keep watch.

What can you do?

Free Software is extremely important in the war to maintain control. Users need to be aware of what’s going on in their phones, in the ISP data centres, in their laptops and in the cloud. Spread, advocate, and use Free Software to maintain freedom from surveillance, freedom from censorship, ownership of our machines, freedom from data retention and logging that can be used against you in the future, and freedom from fear.

Maintain anonymity on the internet because if governments don’t know who you are, their entire strategy falls apart. Use software like Tor (which we’ll introduce with another article next week) to hide your identity, and ensure that you do not remain ignorant. You may not be special now, but you might be in the future, and something is always interesting to someone.

Encourage mainstream adoption of anonymity on the internet, and contribute to projects that are fighting for internet freedom.

And lastly, educate yourself on legislation that might affect your ability to access information, and exercise your democratic right to ensure that legislation is not implemented that might destroy an open internet.

No related posts.

Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.
  • Jorge Andres Merino Santander

    Interesting, i’ll try something. Maybe in the next World war im going to be searched for my love for free things. =)!

    • JeepersMedia

      Change your IP on a regular basis, use disposable cell phones, remove your information from the web completely, opt-out of everything online you can, blur out your google map street views, and BE your OWN superman. Stop waiting around for the government to help you.

  • Igor Rakocevic

    reading this just made me feel like WW3 is at my doorstep

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IK3GYJHISHUG7XCTGBTMOXTHWU Trigger

      lol

  • AneDijitak

    anonimity is not for liberty
    anonimity is for security

    Anybody that thinks using real legal names on the internet is a good
    thing has never been the victim of a stalker. It may be fine and dandy
    for some who can afford
    to hire a full time security team, but for us little people that have
    been forced to move and hide and live in fear from some psycho stalker
    it’s not such a good idea. 

  • http://twitter.com/Azthma Azthma

    I hope stupid people (80% of earth residents) will now understand the extreme importance of sharing and openness, the meaning of humanity and freedom. 

    Know what?   NIcolas SARKOZY, French President, have just congratulated the shutdown of Megaupload. :) Actually we can put him in the 80%.

    • Freddi

      I completely agree.

      We need openness and transparency to understand how the ways of communication, how our software work and how our data is stored, but at the same time, what we communicate, compute and store should stay private and secure (if we want).

      “I’ve nothing to hide” is also some kind of openness, but a destructive openness. In fact it is like if all people at parliamentary election said whom they elected and you are the only one who doesn’t. Everyone would guess whom you elected and you would be immediately suspect.

    • simma lugnt

      He was in the 80% before that. actually it is 63%.

    • Anonymous

      Obama = The dark lord
      SARKOZY = Obama’s puppet!

    • Anonymous

      Obama = The dark lord
      SARKOZY = Obama’s puppet!

  • http://epiphanyproject.wordpress.com/ Timothy Matias

    Great article! I created my own article on the literary benefits of having a pseudonym, which lists some of the major benefits of pseudonymity from the perspective of a writer. http://www.write-a-holic.com/?p=260

    • Anonymous

      Boring. zzz…zzz…zzz…zzz

  • Santiago Burgos

    And this is how everything begins. Even if we’re not from USA (I’m not from there) the situation is not gonna be good if that happens. Maybe it’s a good time to start listening to people like Stallman (which we all thought he was crazy sometimes) and use open source and free software to counter this. Disgracefully it’s the only solution in case SOPA and/or PIPA becomes true.

    Hope that doesn’t happen but prevention is always an option, just in case…

  • anon0mouse

    It’s easy to say, “Hey, advocate anonymity everybody,” here on a geek site.  But the average internet user doesn’t have the savvy to get that done.  Is this article a call to create tools that would make that easier for the average person?  If so, then great. If not, then maybe a little more thought may be in order.

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      The tools already exist. Look at http://torproject.org – although I agree that it would be even nicer if there was a Tor Project Chrome extension or Firefox extension that would make it even easier for users to install and use.

      • http://2buntu.com Roland Taylor

        There is a firefox extension. However, IIRC I read an article that showed Tor is possible to bypass/trace – so it does not save you.

        • dakira

          Usually these “exploits” are bogus or nothing you wouldn’t already find in the TOR manual. That includes “exploits” found at the last chaos communication congress.

          Many articles about the insecurity of TOR tell you, that the people on the exit-nodes can read what you send, sniff your email-logins and such. Well, of course they can. Tor has only ONE purpose. It ensures anonymity. It DOES NOT ensure privacy (i.e. encryption).

          So the exit-nodes or routers between the exit-node and your target don’t know who you are, but they know what you sent. Of course, if you send information that makes you identifiable, they also know who you are. That’s why you should use encryption. But that is NOT TORs task.

          TL;DR: Tor is ONLY for anonymity. Encrypt stuff, if you want privacy, too.

          • Anonymous

            Every tor pass between servers is encrypted (actually multiple times), the only unencrypted is exit node. To protect privacy target web page should use https and that’s it.

          • dakira

            I know. But that encryption is to ensure anonymity, not privacy. It is practically part of the protocol. As I said. Tors task is anonymity. If you want privacy, you have to encrypt stuff yourself. Be it through using https, PGP, OTR or whatever. There’s a really good “Security Now!”-episode on how exactly Tor works.

      • Anonymous

        It does exist Firefox extension. But it is suggested to use Tor browser (Firefox with some extensions bundled like: https everywhere, noscript and torbutton) to make it more private. Tor bundle disables Flash player and other non-secure staff. Flash player can be used on web pages to collect some personal info like IP address etc, so not safe.

    • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

      I’m savvy enough. I just don’t care enough to set it up

  • Confezzor Raziel

    This is what you call powerful writing…5 out of 5 stars..just perfectly expressed…

    • Varttaanen

      Mighty good read! Especially the link with Bentham’s prison.

    • Jos Geluk

      I second this. Very clear and well stated.

    • Anonymous

      Agreed

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IK3GYJHISHUG7XCTGBTMOXTHWU Trigger

      I think that we should have the right to keep our identity secret. If you do not wish to be know, and your not doing “illicit” thing like stealing children you should have that privacy. 

      • ANON

        First Step: Find the pedos
        Second Step: Find the pirates
        Final Solution: Find the Jews.

        We’re letting it happen again.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IK3GYJHISHUG7XCTGBTMOXTHWU Trigger

          Lol I would just barley pass the 
          Nuremberg Laws. 

        • Franko Burolo

          I clicked “like” as an expression of understanding of what you are talking about and finding it sadly true. Surely, it is NOT something really likeable… :-/

    • http://ghetto.k2city.eu Matej Moško

      viva la TOR, that’s a pity that it is full of pedos, dealers and smugglers. However it cannot be avoided.

  • Subhamoy Sengupta

    There seems to be an Ubuntu repository that you can install tor from and stay up-to-date. It is called Ubun-tor. The problem is, I cannot see any patched browser in that repository, which makes this repository really hard to use for a layman, because configuring the regular release of firefox to work with tor flawlessly can be quite an acrobatic task!

    The other thing I am very interested to find out is, is it possible to use a dedicated download manager (such as jDownloader) to work with tor such that even the headers of the files I download through it are not revealed or scrambled or encrypted or something?

  • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

    “capturing a photograph of his audience which he later says he uploaded in case his phone is confiscated at the airport on his way back to the United States of America, of which he is ironically a citizen”

    How is this ironic?

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      His cellphone being confiscated by his own country.

      • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

        That doesn’t make it ironic. American gave the most to charity last year so Iin that way taking something is ironic. The fact that his own country confiscated a native’s property is not ironic.

        • anonymous

          Doesn’t matter unless you look at donations per capita

          • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ActionParsnip ActionParsnip

            True but the situation described isn’t ironic at all. To much Alanis Morissette. HAHAHA

      • Anonymous

        Oh, I thought the ironic part was that the American gov. always says beefed up super-security is to protect against foreign terrorists … but hey, it all works :D

      • Anonymous

        Can I just ask: Can you blame them when he is associated with an illegal site such as wikileaks? And yes, it is illegal. Being open is fine, but what wikileaks are doing is actually against the law and in no way should you be condoning criminals. Plus, considering some of the content that has been featured on the news recently associated with Tor, that could be considered illegal too – facilitating access to illegal content. You really must have done something stupid to suddenly want to be anonymous online. You have nothing to fear if you have nothing to hide. So what are you hiding? Pride?

        • http://epiphanyproject.wordpress.com/ Timothy Matias

          That’s the real problem, is that something that is clearly supported by the constitution is illegal. But setting that aside, It’s illegal in some countries to walk around without a veil, and in many countries it’s illegal to voice your beliefs. If you judge your sense of morality based on the legality of things, then I feel sorry for you.

          What the United States government is doing is wrong, and it would be immoral *not* to do anything about it. Saying that what Wikileaks is doing is wrong, is like saying exposing a mass murderer’s deeds and helping end his rampage is wrong– because that’s exactly what the U.S. government has been doing, and those kind of terrible deeds are the reason Wikileaks even exists in the first place!

  • Stuart Green

    The article states “Encourage mainstream adoption of anonymity on the internet”.

    Could anonymous comments be turned on for OMG Ubuntu? It’s an option when using Disqus, but currently turned off…

    • Varttaanen

      How about an https for OMG Ubuntu?

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      Wasn’t aware of that. Anonymous comments are now turned on.

      • Stuart Green

        Anonymous comments are still turned off for me…

  • Dietmar Wolf

    The world existed without internet, too. We dont need it at all.  If it censored&controlled just shut it down. btw television is and was everytime censored and controlled by the state and no one is interested.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4LXTMAC7KVMD7JBKWBCCBU4HSU inner_turbulence

      There is a difference between television and internet, in fact there was a video discussing the progress of radio, television and internet. All started as a free environment and now internet is the last one stands still. People used to make free radio programs, now that’s controlled, people used to make free tv programs now that’s controlled. Since you were born in a time when tv and radio was censored already, it just does not seem strange to you.

      • Anonymous

        Why don’t you just wear a tin foil hat already? I can’t believe how paranoid you are about the internet. Can I ask, why are you so bothered about people knowing what you’ve been on if there’s nothing to hide? Because you must have done something. There’s no reason to remain anonymous unless you’re paranoid or you’ve done something stupid. I for one support officially controlling the internet. All stupid forum posts which end in ‘your topic isn’t in the right category’ or are years out of date should have a mandatory removal. Postings on the internet which are false should be able to be taken down easily to preserve authenticity of information. And you know what? If you think that the internet is your last refuge for free speech, I feel really sorry for you. Every day, people are exercising their right to free speech out on the streets and in the towns. The only thing they can’t do is be bluntly offensive. How is that censorship? It’s only fair.

  • lyle zeller

    anonimity on the web is a two edged sword.  it is extemely important to protect ones privacy; however, it makes it extremely easy for irresponsible people to slander, libel, chastise, castigate and use other unacceptable behaviors with no consequences for those behaviors.  unfortunately, there is no way to manage those behaviors, as, it seems, immature people are unable to control their behaviors, and there is no one willing to police these behaviors.  is SOPA the answer,  absolutely not.  perhaps more parental guidance and respect for others is in order.

    • Anonymous

      If i knew for sure that my comment wouldn’t be censored …. the amount of swears and dirty words addressed at you with the purpose of bursting at least one of your brain veins would impress even god himself , even if only 1% of them would have done the job in such a severe case as yours.

      You are on the INTERNET. GET the hell over it.

      • Cliff Wells

        I see what you did there.

      • Anonymous

        libel is still a crime, and because it is on the internet does not make it right.

        Anonymity is important but it is generally accepted that one’s own rights end where another person’s begins.  Libel clearly trespasses that boundary, and should never be encouraged.

        • Anonymous

          You my friend are suffering from a terrible but widespread disease. The most severe cases can even lead to death. It’s called GAW/OR (Getting angry without reason).

          SWEARING is just words unfortunately we haven’t yet as a spices or more exactly we don’t want to accept that words don’t hurt only those that suffer from this terrible disease . To prove my point i’l put some BEAUTIFUL Romanian words in front of you. (carefully chosen not to  be properly translated by google translate)

          ciumpalacule
          pisa-m-as pa mata
          de labar

          This words are addressed at all those PERSONS that don’t know their meaning. The moment you realise the meaning, the addressing to you ceases.

          Oh and i’m Jesus Christ.

           So what right exactly does one infringes upon when he swears at someone?

          And reading the bible was a crime in the past. Also smoking weed is a crime . Drinking alcohol was also a crime.

          • Anonymous

            Well, haven’t you missed the whole premise of my argument, eh?

            To be fair, my tone was serious and professional(as it is now) and not in any way angry/vindictive.

            First: libel =/= swearing

            Also, libel sometimes can be extremely damaging to one’s career/future. As an example, let’s say that an online publication began publishing falsified “leaked” financial statements about a certain publicly traded corporation.  The consequences to that corporation would be severe as its stock price depends upon its financial reputation.

            Or maybe we can take the case of the man mentioned in the article, if Ben instead stated that Jacob was wanted in 16 countries, had connections to the Italian mafia, and used this “public speaker” thing as a cover  … if circulated enough, it would probably make his life a lot harder trying to cross borders.

            Actions have consequences, and libel is simply wrong … one cannot have the freedom to infringe upon the freedoms of others.

            Also, your argument about swearing (which is not the same as libel) is logically flawed.  Ever hear of “the damage is done”? You cannot retroactively undo hostilities, you can just stop doing it (hence a little logical flaw).  You are free to swear, but it is of course still an insult … that is why people don’t like it (nobody has anything against the sounds, just their directed meanings).  If you like being insulted, then that is your business not mine.

            Finally, the whole “weed/alcohol is/was illegal” doesn’t change anything about libel.  Those are examples of public health laws and not personal rights laws.

            Again, one person does not and may not have the freedom to damage the freedom of others … libel does that, so it is wrong.

            PS. Using your logic, murder is ok as long as you remain anonymous (an extreme example, but hey “alcohol used to be illegal”!) ;P … but you see my point

          • Anonymous

            COW DUNG.
            The stock of the company MIGHT FALL ONLY IF most stock holders are NAIVE. They are free to believe the online publication or not. Seing is believing . READING AIN’T .

            The second example exactly the same. The mans reputation is affected only if it’s supporters are naive and believe the libeler. Now what can i say if all your supporters are naive then maybe you are just a profiter just as the libeler.

            Now about my swearing example.

            When the words were addressed at you for example you didn’t knew the meaning. You can’t be damaged by some word you don’t know the meaning of.

            if your logic would be true then  I could attribute a damaging meaning to any word I choose.

            IF/WHEN you knew the words meaning  they just weren’t addressed at you anymore so again no DAMAGE DONE.

            Still you haven’t told me how am i infringing ones freedom by libeling. You have the freedom to claim you are whatever you want to be but i have te right to claim you aren’t. If this ain’t true then I’m just Jesus Christ and all who say i’m not could face libel charges .

            libel=

            a. defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
            b. the act or crime of publishing it.
            c. a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
            http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/libel

            BUT you were reffering to some other crime : SLANDER . And to tell you the truth i believe this two are just the same organic fertilizer and should be treated the same :NULL.
            If i Drink Alcoohol i don’t do damage to anyone except to me . So none of your business.
            Murder implies someone else besides you.

            *If we run out of reply space reply to the previous comment.

          • Anonymous

            @sfantu:disqus :
            Naivety has nothing to do with it, and I take it that you have never dealt with heavy investments, financial journalism is what a lot of risk-taking investors rely on … it gives them a nice overview of where companies are at in between the periodic reports (Hence they depend on them to give more “sight” … they would have to wait until all is done to “see for themselves”).  Libel there is serious and will end the career of a journalist because false reports hurt everybody.

            Also, everybody is free to believe something or not … but I take it you don’t believe anything written in an academic journal because “pics or it didn’t happen”? That would just be purely naive.  People trust journalists, that is why libel is illegal in the first place.  It is not there faults that they were mislead, because by that logic, people who make ponzi schemes would be off the hook since all they did was give their clients false written reports.  They were naive, so it should be legal, right?

            As for the definition of libel:
            Slander is spoken
            Libel is written

            As for your swearing example:
            Actually, there would only be no damage done if those words were not insulting.
            If they are insulting then you have been insulting me for the better part of the day.

            Here consider this:
            I put you in a room with a locked box … I tell you that the box has highly radioactive material in it and as long as it is closed will continue to harm you … if you finally crack the lock (language barrier in this case) and find nothing then there was no harm done, but if there was something there then you have already been exposed even if the box is removed right after opening.

            Frankly I see your example as evasive, sloppy, and underhanded.  Because if I understand you correctly, you are saying that when I find out that you “were” insulting me … not very comforting is it?
             The key word is “anymore” … that is referring to a time where such action did indeed take place.

            I understand where you are coming from (A take on Schrodinger’s Cat), but the problem is that your example would be if the cat was either dead or mauling my face, but when I opened the box it would die.  However, that would not null the mauling if the cat was previously alive.

            Again, I have to say that your swearing example is purely lacking in logical consistency.

            And the freedoms I have been referring to is the pursuit of happiness (actually a freedom) and of life (in my murder extrapolation).  Libel is when one’s freedom of public expression limits or damages another’s ability to pursue happiness (a good life … yadda yadda, look it up).

            Imagine if I went to your community and hired a whole bunch of journalists to libel the jesus out of you (see what I did there?).  They would write that you were a molester, petty thief, scumbag, women-beater (this one would be easy since all it takes is a few fake quotes from a “scared woman who couldn’t call the cops *tears*”), etc. and plastered your face around town in well-respected media outlets.  Are you saying that it would not affect your ability to get a decent job, meet new people, not be harassed, or even live your life?

            People have a right not to have to defend against baseless libel and slander, and asking people to be less “naive” is a bunch of of “cow dung” if you ask me.

          • Anonymous

            Yes I say you are free to hire all the journalist you want to hire and liebel/slander the hell or jesus out of me. I should also hire journalist if i ever feel the need to deffend my self. But the fac that you liebel/slander whatever you want to call it doesn mean it’s true. It’s just some peoples opinion. The other people wich aren’t different from me and you can believe whatever the hell they want and also that fact that they would believe the journalist , crying woman etc etc. also means nothing , i’m not going to jail , i’m not recieving any damage at all. Sure I might see people rejecting me or refusing to do business with me but that would just mean they are stupid , naive , ignorant people. As far as I know they could reject me for any number of reasons , skin color , religion , nationality , etc. all being ignorant and stupid.

            Now let me go back to the swearing example.

            Let’s just say that my swearing example is wrong. And you were  damaged without knowing the meaning of the words because you found out that i was insulting you and you felt the damage from the past.

            Lets just say i’m insane . And i start to claim i’m offended by some word … you can pick whatever normally non-insulting word you want. Should you stop using it? I think not. I go to court and I file charges against you. I will loose of course . Should i feel That justice ain’t served , because JUSTICE just WASN’T SERVED. And me insane or not remains with the damage.

            Were as a spices insane. We take damage from where there is none.

  • Anonymous

    That Truely Is Beautiful writing, Thankyou veru much for stepping up and supporting the internet, may noone bring us down

  • https://profiles.google.com/u/0/sagarsiddhapura/about SAM

    @humphreybc:disqus :
    Is it ok if I want to post this same article (from first word to last) on my blog including courtesy link to this article at bottom?

    • http://twitter.com/humphreybc Benjamin Humphrey

      Usually I’d say we like exclusivity but I feel this is a really important message to send, so yes, you’re welcome to post it with attribution =)

  • boskysquelch

    I wonder if this will be “censored” in a Panoptical form?

  • http://www.metallic-entertainment.com Florian Märkl

    If you have not read the book “Little Brother” by Cory Doctorow yet, you should definitly do this! It is REALLY good and interesting! (And it is also free as an e-book btw) http://craphound.com/littlebrother/download/

  • Anton Shpigunov

    Hi. I believe that with all the censorship and control in place, the Internet community will be moving closer and closer towards the P2P model in order to avoid relying on a single authority. There’s a number of P2P tools already available. I did an article on this: http://anton.shpigunov.com/2012/01/the-dawn-of-the-distibuted-web/

  • Benjamin

    An interesting and intelligent article! Nice! :)

    You should explain the relation between the use of free software and anonymity, because it’s not all that obvious.

    The “I don’t have anything to hide” is so true. But I’m sure that most people who were victims of Nazis pretty much thought they had nothing to hide either, before the Nazis began aggressions.

    There is a documentary series from BBC i think, episode 3 of which (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVOQVZuQ3XM) is trying to convince you to “give” your data away “so scientists can help us”. They argue that if people believe to be in possession of their data and that they have the capacity to sell it as a commodity, they would be OK with it and not worry to much about privacy. On the other hand, what is not said is that once you sold the data, there is no way taking it back. If you know where I live and you want to kill me, I cannot un-tell you where I live.

    Also it seems very easy for a country to just “shut down” the Internet,
    and I am very curious as to whether there are alternatives to Internet
    or at in the way it is provided.

    I really like this article and hope there will be more like this coming with tips and tutorials on how to insure one’s privacy.

    • Anonymous

      You can always set up your own internet. Look up the FabFi project, or Mesh Networking. If only a couple of nodes in a Mesh Network have a connection to the rest of the Internet, the whole Mesh Network does. I believe there is great potential in that to free the Internet from corporate or governmental control. Imagine how hard it would be to shut down the internet if every other house in a city had a Mesh Network antenna …

  • http://twitter.com/Shane12088 Shane

    “Devices are built and shipped with tracking capability built-in and hidden deep in the firmware, ready to be activated whenever a government deems you as a person of interest.”

    Any specific devices that we’re talking about here? Or is it more of a general warning that a device could be used for malicious intent either by the manufacturer or a third party application?

    • Anonymous

      Here is an interesting link for you. It talks about the recent discovery of a software called Carrier IQ being preinstalled on multiple iPhone and Android phones.

      http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/30/2601695/carrier-iq-controversy

      So it’s not even a general warning, it is already happening!

      • Anonymous

        It seems to be limited to ‘smart’ phones, so I’m not at risk – I still use a feature phone. I never saw the point of ‘smart’ phones anyway.

    • Anonymous

      Cellphone chips can actually locate you even if the phone is off (but the battery has to be in)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_LRJBXZSHKTIO3J4LH7WKOX45SU TC

    I linked your articles to many of the “ol’ folks” family members and they FINALLY GET IT (why SOPA and all the “internet laws” are not. good. at. all.).

    My mother gets it now so, I gotta give props to you for actually convincing her/changing her mind. Wow.

    You have such a concise and yet detailed way of writing that creates the “big picture” of your message. Awesome writing skills :D

  • Anonymous

    What you can do?
    Support Tor by running a node.
    Support Freenet by running Freenet in the background.
    Support GNUnet by helping with the development.
    Support projects that aim to decentralize the web like Freedombox.

    Also use End-to-end encryption whenever possible through tools like OTR (instant messaging), GnuPG (email), Zfone (VoIP), Truecrypt/eCryptfs/encfs (filesystems, folders), …

    • anonim

      Nice collection, but I should add also:
      Support I2P by running a node.
      I think it is more promising network.

    • http://forteller.net/ Børge / forteller

       I was also going to mention Freedombox. A fantastic project that combines FOSS, cloud, federation, anonymity, and full control over your own data.

      Everyone interested in these topics should watch this great talk by Even Moglen, of Gnome fame, and starter of the Freedombox Foundation:

      Why Political Liberty Depends on Software Freedom More Than Ever

      I also want to link to a blogpost I’ve written where I mention other FOSS cloud projects that are working on federation, making it impossible to take down/censor the social network. If your part of the network is censored, you can set up a new and be part of the network again at once. Here: Think Like the Internet — or How to Fight Facebook, and Win

  • https://launchpad.net/~shnatsel Shnatsel

    Nobody cares until it hits them. Really.
    Fighting for somebody’s else freedom is pointless. It won’t work. They don’t want the freedom.
    It’s easier not to think for yourself and entrust your doom to somebody else, especially seeing people around you doing it. When convenience conflicts with freedom, convenience usually wins.
    And, finally, people who don’t prefer convenience can be eliminated easily enough, because there won’t be many of them.

  • The Next Step

    great article! please post how tos on how to install the various privacy tools on ubuntu! be sure to highlight what they can and can’t do (for example, you can’t bittorrent over tor, as bittorrent will still reveal your IP address, so if you want private P2P filesharing you’re better off with gnunet (for example) and even then you need to configure it correctly)

    • Small steps!

      I want to know the difference between Freenet, GNUnet, E2P and TOR. It’s confusing!

  • Vincent S The

    Great writing

  • http://zifre.myopenid.com/ Zifre

    Anyone else think it’s ridiculous that he hasn’t got his phones back and has been repeatedly detained for doing nothing illegal? If I were him I’d make a big deal about it.

    It’s funny how this article makes it sound like 1984 is coming, when it’s already here…

    • Anonymous

      He probably left them after they told that he would have to wait a few weeks to collect after they have been “processed”

      Not really worth it

  • 3llaothman

    very intresting read, keep up the good articles.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with the article, but the “I have nothing to hide” people will not read this, at least not with any intent to actually reflect on the words.

    Their “nothing to hide” mantra exists for the purpose of limiting their involvment.  If they had to acknowledge there is a problem, they would have to do something about it.  It’s easier to simply claim they don’t have to care.  It goes agains their inertia to admit the existence of a problem with a lack of anonymity.  Unless things actually bites them back, it is highly unlikely you will reach them.

    Denial coupled with complacency is what your trying to break, and that is one hard task.

  • Anonymous

    Is it possible to maintain anonymity on the web and use services like Ubuntu One?

  • Anonymous


    Maintain anonymity on the internet because if governments don’t know who you are, their entire strategy falls apart. ’
    What sort of paranoid nonsense is this? Idiotic, purile victimhood at its worst.
    We cannot allow the internet a ‘special status’ in anonymity, it must be susceptible to court orders as much as any other communication means. The TOR network is used famously for much worse things than Anonymous, (I’ll refrain from shrieking think of the children).
    The governments are OUR elected representatives in most parts of the world and their failing is our failing, put proper constitutional protections in place and stop thinking the internet will always be for good because a completely Anarchist, anonymous place where anyone can , say, do, plan or buy and share any material without being subject to normal justified investigations is one I want no part in.

    • Mintybaws

      Total anonymity on the web is fine, national and state laws still apply in the real world.

      If you buy bombs over a TOR network, buying the bomb is fine. Shipping it is going to be pretty tough, and still illegal. Paedophiles will still be stopped in the real world when they engage with children physically but tearing apart everybody’s privacy just to get at a few nasties is a lot like killing the patient to kill the cancer – pointless. IN addition if states start trying to police the internet, where are you going to draw the  terretorial line. Who’s jurisdiction was mega upload? The founders were from NZ and the company based in HK, NOT AMERICA. Congress could have firewalled the site, or requested any US hosing companies to cease hosting the site, but kidnapping a foreign national BEFORE conviction should me more illegal than making £130 mil off advertising around links to pirated goods. Pirating isn’t even the same as theft for Zeus’s sake!
      Time was this kind of legal rampage would have had the international community up in arms – imagine if congress tried the same sledgehammer approach on a Russian national – or why don’t they go after the real threats in China.

      Here in the UK we still have the relatively uncensored BBC, it’s not perfect but it’s ok, but the internet is an entirely different medium. Internet access is part of the individual, and an attack on my privacy whilst surfing the web is akin to an attack on my thoughts. I can think about murdering someone all i like, especially if the imagination delights and i lose the urge to actually murder. But murdering is still wrong.

      Committing a crime that changes the real world is a matter for national justice systems. Researching a crime is not a crime.

  • anonymous

    I have been posting anonymously on just about every service I use on the internet, I am shocked every day at how many people never even thought about the concept that leaving their name on everything could come back to bite them in the future.

  • ThePower

    Funny seeing this being posted by someone who once said “dude, you’re a 35 year old with a neck beard living in your Mum’s basement, no one cares enough to breach your privacy and steal your mainframe!”

    Brilliant.

  • Awesome.
    May the force be with you in actions like this.

  • http://www.omniview.com.au/ Biometrics

    express ideas freely is very important, but so is addressing the implications of your actions.

    • Bob Dole

      Agreed. Too many people use the internet for being horrible pieces of work. At least give the authorities powers for removing hateful and factually incorrect posts.

  • ShaneO

    Amazing article. Have to do a project in my speech class and chose anonymity on the Internet  and this article is def. going to be used. People arnt as informed about security as they need to be. Thank you for posting this

  • Jonathanlyng

    I am truly sick and tired of the pedo justification to counter freedom. Pedos are a danger IRL. The internet doesn’t create pedos. The people are f….ed up in their minds and the thousands of molested kids haven’t all been met in cyberspace… thinking about it, pretty certain a disney chatroom has better security than the local mall toilets! Not counting all the arrest permited by theire photo postings that allowed all thhe arrests that would have never happened if the net wasn’t involved!

  • Anonymous

    There is no killing involved . I already told the words were purposely chosen not to be translated properly .

  • Stuart Green

    eaf