A beginners tour of Shotwell – Ubuntu’s new photo manager

Ubuntu 10.10 will see the much-derided F-Spot pushed out of the frame in favour of the lighter, leaner Yorba-developed photo manager/editor app going by the name of Shotwell‘.

Whilst we've featured Shotwell many times on OMG! Ubuntu! but, for many of you reading this, Maverick will be your first chance to get a close-up with the neat little tool.

With that in mind what better time for a brief run down of using Shotwell. We likely won't squeeze in a mention for every options, setting and feature Shotwell has but we'll do our best€¦

First run

You’re new to Shotwell and Shotwell knows that. To help develop your potential relationship Shotwell launches a handy 'first-run' dialogue to get you up and running. Selection_004[3]
Photos can be imported via the 'File' menu, a camera or simply dragging and dropping images on to the Shotwell interface.

Importing photos from a camera

Shotwell, like F-Spot, can be made to auto-launch on the insertion of a digital camera. 4.0 GB Filesystem_006[3]I plugged in my Kodak Zi8 – a HD video camera that can also take photos – to see what would happen.

The process was instant: I plugged in, the dialogue above opened, I clicked okay and there were my photos in Shotwell ready to be imported, edited and tagged.
Shotwell_008[3]
I didn't want to import my entire collection of random photos to my Pictures folder (Shotwells default placing) but merely a couple.

Selecting a number other than 'all' would be a bit unintuitive for someone not versed in the handy CTRL+Click. I initially thought I could simply click on the ones I wished to import to select them, clicking them again to deselect, but no dice.

After selecting my photos for import using CTRL+Click I then used the right click menu to import them.Shotwell_009[3]
Yikes! After a successful import the following  prompt popped up which, had I not paid attention, could easily have cost me my original photos! Import Complete_010[3]

The Main window

One great thing about Shotwell is the consistency – you don't have separate jarring designed windows for import, editing, etc – they all not only look pretty much the same but behave the same.

The main window can be zoomed into, you can right click on photos to duplicate photos and add tags.

Photos are grouped into 'events' based on the the date/time the photos was taken. These dates can be renamed to more meaningful titles such as 'Day out with Benjamin' or 'UDS 2009'. Where there is no date available the event defaults to the date the photo was imported. 
Shotwell_011[3]
Tagging and Events
Adding tags makes sorting photos, at least in my opinion, easier. Want to find all photos with Aunt Thelma in? Tags all the pictures she's in with 'Thelma' and hey presto – easy access.

Adding tags is done by selecting/right-clicking on the photo/s you wish to add a certain tag/s to and choosing 'add tag'.Add Tags_015[3]Adjust time and date
We touched on 'event' data above but often this might not be accurate or your desired preference. You can adjust the time and date data of selected photos by right clicking on the photo(s) you wish to edit and choosing 'Adjust time and date'. 
Adjust Date and Time_016[3]

Editing

Shotwell comes packed with an impressive – nay comprehensive – array of editing and tweaking tools, helping touch up photos that are overly dark, washed out, need red eyes removed, etc.
Shotwell_014[3]
To edit a photo you simply need to double click on it. It will open up larger with the editing toolbar underneath. The main 'editing' tools present in Shotwell are: -

  • Rotation
  • Cropping (with auto-sizes etc)
  • Red eye reduction
  • Adjust exposure, saturation, tint, temperature and shadow
  • Cne-click €œenhance€ feature

Other features available, but only present in the 'photo' menu include mirroring, flipping and

One click enhance

The one-click 'enhance' feature is pretty hit and miss. Below sit two photos. The left is the original and the right has been €œenhanced€ using the one-click tool in shotwell.

Whilst the image does look better on the whole it is a bit overly light in places (for example the top of my thigh) but the best contrast is pretty decent for an 'automatic' method – but certainly not up to par with Google Picasa.

One doesn't need to be in editor mode to apply the auto-enhance effect – just right-click on any photo & select ‘enhance’.

Slideshow

Shotwell boats a slideshow feature that is no worse €“ or no better €“ than that of any other image viewer or organizer. You can specify time between transition and manually hit the €œnext/previous€ buttons to zip though.Screenshot-1

Exporting photos

No desktop photo manager would be worth saying Cheese to if it lacked social-media exporting. Fans of F-Spot willing to give Shotwell a try will find that it also supports major online services such as: -

  • Flickr
  • Facebook
  • PicasaWeb
Exporting doesn't just involve online either, you are able to export any photo in your library to a different file format and with differing rates of compression.

Preferences

Everyone loves a good preferences package and Shotwell has€¦ well.. a few preferences. To be fair up until recently Shotwell had no preferences at all so this is a step in the right direction. ShotwellPreferences_0053Here you can set the background colour (on a scale of white to dark), import location (defaults to the Pictures folder in your Home) and set external applications for advanced editing.

image

Related posts:

  1. Shotwell 0.6.1 Released – gains RAW, PNG support, preferences dialog, more.
  2. See Ya F-Spot! Shotwell to be default Image App in Ubuntu 10.10
  3. Shotwell Image Manager 0.3.0 Reviewed
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • AlexIdentity

    Great photo manager, and for editing too.

  • Lars

    Why choose “my pictures” and not a subfolder?. Why not leave the photos were they are, or the give the user the ability to choose a folder?

    Why not right-click “open location” and “edit with”?

    Shotwell got potential, I’m keen to see the program’s evolution.

    • Anonymous

      I tested Shotwell and it offers me to just link the images to its library and leave the original ones where they belong. I loved that feature.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZYWDRD6YDPOQJYPN7VCZE6CVWA Neo

    The problem is, if I want to open a picture which is totally black in color, then I could not see that. Do you know, how to change the background in transparent like “the eye of gnome”? I know there is an option to change the background color into white. but I want to make it transparent.

  • maxauthority

    Why can’t they just create a photo manager where you just view any folder, without the need for a library? They could still store thumbnails when reading the folder and save metadata in some defined format when viewing, but not with an extra “importing” step.

    • http://www.associatedcontent.com/ericcflem EricCFlem

      I just deleted a six-paragraph rant of me explaining why Shotwell should be removed and gThumb installed as the default photo manager for Ubuntu, but it sounded a bit bitter to me, so I deleted it.

      Suffice it to say, gThumb does exactly what you want, and the new versions of it are incredible. Shotwell will definitely be one of the first programs I get rid of, and gThumb the first I install, when Maverick comes out.

    • http://www.associatedcontent.com/ericcflem EricCFlem

      I just deleted a six-paragraph rant of me explaining why Shotwell should be removed and gThumb installed as the default photo manager for Ubuntu, but it sounded a bit bitter to me, so I deleted it.

      Suffice it to say, gThumb does exactly what you want, and the new versions of it are incredible. Shotwell will definitely be one of the first programs I get rid of, and gThumb the first I install, when Maverick comes out.

      • http://omgubuntu.co.uk/ d0od

        gThumb is an impressive application – more so since it was rewritten from scratch.

      • http://omgubuntu.co.uk/ d0od

        gThumb is an impressive application – more so since it was rewritten from scratch.

    • Anonymous

      Because it’s way easier to manage a vast collection of photos with a library model instead of manually creating/browsing folders?

      • T_________U

        IMHO, what is annoying is that it prevents you from using your own directory structure, and makes you dependent on a specific piece of sofware.

        I won’t use it because it forces me to re-import all my pictures and will store it differently, while I’m not even sure I’ll keep using it.

        It’s a bit like iTunes used to be. (I guess it’s not the case anymore ?). Fortunately, all modern mp3 players can just “watch” a directory.

        • http://www.associatedcontent.com/ericcflem EricCFlem

          Couldn’t agree more. I’m particular about my MP3s, and I’m particular about my photos. I have folders named after years, folders inside those named after months, and if I feel the need, I’ll name a folder of pictures after a date, and of course the event. I do this when I’m importing them, just as I’d tag the photos at import using a different program, so it’s not as if it’s a big hassle to keep my folder hierarchy up to date.

        • Guest

          It does *not* force you into a directory structure — if you don’t copy the files from your old structure over it’ll just add the paths to those files into its db.

  • http://twitter.com/CapnGoat Cap’n Goat

    I hope they will add support for .CR2 files. Got a bunch of RAWs and Shotwell looks promising.

  • http://twitter.com/CapnGoat Cap’n Goat

    I hope they will add support for .CR2 files. Got a bunch of RAWs and Shotwell looks promising.

  • Steren

    Can it watch folder? If not, it won’t be more useful than fspot to me.

  • Greg Ryman

    I like the format in which shotwell imports, but I don’t like that you can’t use it over network shares. I’ve yet to find a photo manager that lets me keep all of my photos on my NAS.

    Anyway, anyone know how to delete the config for shotwell? Mine keeps core dumping, presumably because of the network share setup I tried.

    • Yfrwlf

      Good luck, try a file search for it in your home dir. All apps need to start using $appconfigdir i.e. virtual pathing of some sort so that all configs are dumped someplace that is universally defined by the system, so you won’t have to put up with some programs keeping their data in ~/.prog, some in ~/.gnome2/prog, some in ~/.config/prog, etc. Those are the kind of meaningful standardized improvements Linux needs, though the other stuff is good too.

    • http://twitter.com/niblettes john trenouth

      Use digiKam — I do, and I keep all my photos on a samba share. Also, it stores all meta data within the photos themselves.

  • http://twitter.com/yureetza Jurica Goja

    cool! it was about time they removed F-Spot…

  • David

    Are there no icons that go with the tags, then? That seems very lacking to me… I love that on F-Spot I can have the faces of all my friends that have been tagged.

  • T_________U

    This seems pretty good, but I wish it enabled people to keep their directory structure and watch their “pictures folder”. Having to manually import pictures and let the software organize how they are written to disk is pretty annoying, in my opinion.

    After all, mp3 players can now watch your music directory. :-)

  • Marcus

    Where is the point in not supporting videos? Every digicam can take them. Everybody wants to have his videos taken during last holiday along with the associated photos.

  • Marcus

    Where is the point in not supporting videos? Every digicam can take them. Everybody wants to have his videos taken during last holiday along with the associated photos.

    • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/44RKEMFIHPAGRRE4I4RILSNYDU FlyC

      It’s where they didn’t have the time to implement it yet… Of course it’s a feature which will be added, just, it needs some time, like every other missing feature.
      Probably it’ll come with the ability to play the videos as well, and that brings some additional problems about codecs, players, etc…

  • http://www.ivankristianto.com Ivan Kristianto

    It’s nice tools.
    But i don’t spend much time on editing ans store my photos.
    I prefer upload it to facebook or picassa. Save more space on harddrive.

  • David

    What was ever wrong with F-spot apart from that it was written in mono? It has a fuller feature set and is written in a lower level language than python.

  • http://twitter.com/holmythegr8 Shawn holmes

    Question- I can’t pick an existing folder to upload to. The option is there but it is grayed out. Any suggestions?

  • Akos Kemives

    I always grouped my pictures by directories and not by events/dates because I have a lot of pictures from separate cameras, even with wrong dates.
    Is there any way to get my pictures grouped by directories – as they stored on the hard drive – and not by events?

  • Akos Kemives

    I always grouped my pictures by directories and not by events/dates because I have a lot of pictures from separate cameras, even with wrong dates.
    Is there any way to get my pictures grouped by directories – as they stored on the hard drive – and not by events?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rajendra-Mp/100000473805311 Rajendra Mp

    Hello,
    From a short while I get this message, whenever I try to access the directories through ‘Places’: ” No Images found in File: ///home/mpr/Documents” in a window named Eye of GNOME Image viewer.   Could someone help me get rid of this? Thanks and warm regards. Rajendra E-mail Address: mp.rajendra@gmail.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rajendra-Mp/100000473805311 Rajendra Mp

    Hello,
    From a short while I get this message, whenever I try to access the directories through ‘Places’: ” No Images found in File: ///home/mpr/Documents” in a window named Eye of GNOME Image viewer.   Could someone help me get rid of this? Thanks and warm regards. Rajendra E-mail Address: mp.rajendra@gmail.com