Spotify Comes to Linux

By , Published July 12, 2010

256Popular music streaming service 'Spotify' have today announced a preview release of a native Linux build of their desktop media player.

Until now Linux users of the service had to use Spotify through Wine – which whilst not an overly bad solution was not as integrated or elegant as a native version provides.

The current preview of the desktop app only works with premium accounts for now because Spotify have yet to find €œ€¦a reliable way to display ads [so] this version is only available to Spotify Premium subscribers.€

image

Install

Installing the package is a bit of a faff: -

  • Open up Software Sources from the System > Administration sub-menu
  • Add the following line as a new source and name it 'spotify':
    • deb http://repository.spotify.com stable non-free
  • Reload/update your sources
  • Now run: -
    • sudo apt-get install spotify-client-qt spotify-client-gnome-support
  • The GPG keys needed to verify the repos can be added like so via the terminal: -
    • gpg –keyserver wwwkeys.de.pgp.net –recv-keys 4E9CFF4E
    • gpg –export 4E9CFF4E |sudo apt-key add -

Tango Spotify icon by toruzz, Spotify Screenshot by leejarratt

Related posts:

  1. Latest Spotify works great in Ubuntu
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://www.twitter.com/wilsonliam Wilsonliam

    YES! It’s about time, too! I hope they release a free (Not premium required) version, I’m too stingy to buy a premium account…

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/YCSKYW5XAZBXWHZ2I5RPCNXYBU Isaac

    I was excited until I read “premium accounts only”…. :S –big whoop–

    • ActionParsnip

      Dude it’s cheap as hell. Considering you saved cash with your free OS just shell out for unlimited access to unlimited audio. Sounds like a deal to me :)

  • http://twitter.com/spanglesontoast spanglesontoast

    The penny dropped when I read for a second time “Premium” :(

  • Anonymous

    Also check out grooveshark premium, you can get an adobe air app native on Linux, though it is a premium as well. Grooveshark.coim however works with flash no problem, i like the idea that they made their desktop app through adobe air for compatibility

  • http://twitter.com/meepdancesshit callum saunders

    any screenshots?

  • Anonymous

    If you get an error with the “spotify-client-gnome-support”, it doesn’t matter too much. You can still run it via the command line by just typing “spotify”.

    It begins to run but I can’t log in, as I’m not a premium user.

    Excellent news though, I’ve been waiting for this for a *long* time!

    • Øsse

      I get the following error:
      -
      The following packages have unmet dependencies:
      spotify-client-gnome-support: Depends: gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2) but 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
      -
      I cannot start spotify with just ‘spotify’ :/

    • Øsse

      I get the following error:
      -
      The following packages have unmet dependencies:
      spotify-client-gnome-support: Depends: gconf2 (>= 2.28.1-2) but 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 is to be installed
      -
      I cannot start spotify with just ‘spotify’ :/

      • Øsse

        Sorry, I misunderstood. Yes it works when just installing the other package. Because of that error none of the packages were installed.

      • Øsse

        Sorry, I misunderstood. Yes it works when just installing the other package. Because of that error none of the packages were installed.

      • Izo

        Yeah, it has a problem with my gconf package as well.

      • Izo

        Yeah, it has a problem with my gconf package as well.

    • andy

      Just install spotify-client-qt in ubuntu, spotify-client-gnome-support isnt needed. After it’s installed just run spotify, or create your own laucher for it.

    • andy

      Just install spotify-client-qt in ubuntu, spotify-client-gnome-support isnt needed. After it’s installed just run spotify, or create your own laucher for it.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/DATA6WDNBSCFJL6JSP5OP3AADQ asedsa

    There are now 3 levels of Spotify accounts. Free with adverts. £4.99 with no ads. £9.99 with no ads + mobile spotify.

    Personally I think that new middle tier is very tempting as I wouldn’t use spotify on my mobile phone anyway. Plus its a cheap way of showing your support for Spotify on linux.

    • Anonymous

      The middle one (Unlimited) doesn’t work on the Linux preview yet, it’s just for Premium users. Bit strange, considering the Unlimited account doesn’t require the adverts that are posing the problem in this case!

      • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/DATA6WDNBSCFJL6JSP5OP3AADQ asedsa

        I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, but requiring Premium does seem a bit fishy.

      • Niclas

        Since it’s a temporary solution to the lack of ad support, i’d guess that they just chose to let the linux client be seen as a phone device to their backend. Seems easiest that way.

      • Niclas

        Since it’s a temporary solution to the lack of ad support, i’d guess that they just chose to let the linux client be seen as a phone device to their backend. Seems easiest that way.

  • Anonymous

    Awesome! Now Spotify has to come to Canada.

  • Anonymous

    This is great. They’re a bit late though because in Norway (and the rest of scandinavia?) we’ve had a player called Wimp (yeah it’s hilarious) available for a while, but it’s adobe air-based. Wimp is also payware only. But now I can use spotify on both my Desire and my PCs, so I think I’ll buy myself a premium pass one of these days :)

  • thatguy

    OMG YES, I’ve waited SOOOOOOOOO long for this!

  • http://twitter.com/leejarratt Lee Jarratt

    Spotify Linux running on my machine :)

    http://imgur.com/UAeuz.png

    (do0d you may add this to your post if you’d like..) Also, I can only run it through terminal, anyone know how I can add a launcher for this for the menus?

    • Sebas310

      Right click the menu and left click “Edit Menus,” click add launcher on the right, paste in the command (it should automatically generate the icon) and type in the name.

  • B@b

    HELLLLLLLLL YESSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • B@b

      oh, premium… damn.

      • B@b

        oh good, as soon as they find a way to display ads, spotify free and open users can get it.

        • Anonymous

          lol do you comment throughout every article you read? I just wait till I’m done reading. :P

        • Anonymous

          lol do you comment throughout every article you read? I just wait till I’m done reading. :P

          • B@b

            I read the title and got exited – 1st comment.
            Read the article – 2nd comment, could edited it though, so I posted the 3rd lol.

          • B@b

            I read the title and got exited – 1st comment.
            Read the article – 2nd comment, could edited it though, so I posted the 3rd lol.

  • Anonymous

    The pricing is a bit err…pricey isn’t it.

  • http://twitter.com/ThomasBerends Thomas Berends

    Bad that it doesn’t fit the theme….. it is now weird, like google chrome…

    • http://powerpatrick.myopenid.com/ PowerPatrick
    • Anonymous

      You can make chrome follow your gtk theme more or less by going to options=>”Personal Stuff” and choose “Use GTK+ theme” and “Use system title bar and borders”.

      It doesn’t fit perfectly with all themes, but It’s way better than Spotify. Although, we shouldn’t be mad at the Spotify devs! Come on, they made a native client for us! We should be happy! :D

      And don’t forget that some people like to have the same interface on applications on different systems, so they don’t have to relearn how to use it.

  • http://twitter.com/leejarratt Lee Jarratt

    Another screenshot, showing starred songs etc.. It runs really smoothly and the font rendering is beautiful (unlike *shudder* WINE).The only issues I currently encounter is resizing, and not having any launchers to the application.

    http://imgur.com/y8SUL.png

    • heckla

      WINE can render fonts as good as the rest of your system.
      It is currently not activated by default, but it is easy to enable and the result is perfect in Spotify.
      See here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1050920

      • http://twitter.com/leejarratt Lee Jarratt

        Thank you for the link, never knew that.. Will try it out :)

  • Martin

    omg^3

    Wooooh!

    !!!!

    And yeah, Spotify premium is so totally worth it since you get to used it on a mobile device as well, which is totally sweet :) since you can sync once over wifi and then use offline mode to save bw cost.

    The app works great but I recommend using aptitude as apt-get didn’t want to install due to wrong version of gconf (according to apt-get, aptitude worked fine)

    • Claudio

      you are right and you solved my problem! Thank you!

    • Alexi

      darn it, don’t want to afford premium version :(

      Will there be a native linux version for free, too?

      • Niclas

        “The current preview of the desktop apponlyy works with premium accounts for now because Spotify have yet to find “…a reliable way to display ads [so] this version is only available to Spotify Premium subscribers.””

        Sounds like free accounts will work once they have sorted out the ad problem.

  • http://twitter.com/mickstep Michael Stephenson

    sudo add-apt-repository ‘deb http://repository.spotify.com stable non-free’
    sudo apt-key adv –keyserver wwwkeys.de.pgp.net –recv-keys 4E9CFF4E

    Why did you not just use these commands?

    • Aldo Mann

      Thanks, actually I didn’t know ‘add-apt-repository’ worked also with external to the Launchpad PPAs.

      • http://twitter.com/mickstep Michael Stephenson

        Neither did I, I was originally just gonna post the key command, but then I thought “well if it only did ppa’s it would be called add-apt-ppa” and then checked out the manpage.

  • http://blastfromthepast.se/ Tommy Brunn

    I haven’t really been using Spotify since half of their library disappeared, but it’s still nice to have a proper native client.

    I’m not a “freetard” by any means, but what does suck about most closed-source projects is that they never fully integrate themselves with the desktop environment. For example, I’d be surprised if they enabled indicator applet support, made the client blend in with the GTK/Qt theme used, respected user interface conventions, etc.

  • http://orkutcidio.deliriocoletivo.org Peterson Espaçoporto

    Not that I had any interest in paying for streamed music as I have plenty here but…Non-native window borders = It can go to hell.

    • http://twitter.com/chuche17 Jesus Galvan

      Dude it’s like saying you don’t like qt apps or anything non-gtk… That is just… too funny since the choice of window border manager is not always indicative of the quality of the apps themselves.

      • http://orkutcidio.deliriocoletivo.org Peterson Espaçoporto

        I actually use KDE =) But anyway, QT apps look awesome under gnome.

        The thing with window borders is that is not ONLY about beauty, is also functionality. What you’re going to do under Ubuntu? Keep ALL the window controls at the left and use them at the right ONLY with Spotify? Change them back? What if I like them being at the left? What’s going to happen when windicators come?

        It might seem minor, but this would be a huge annoyance. I want to close spotify, lalala… First time would be like “hahaha I forgot the buttons are there hehehe” by the fifth time you forget it you go like “GRRR goddamn devs who want this to look like a Mac OS app at all costs”.

        • http://twitter.com/chuche17 Jesus Galvan

          Yeah, you are right =) Except that most Linux distros are still using buttons on the right-hand side. It is Ubuntu’s prerogative where they want their buttons by default.

        • http://twitter.com/chuche17 Jesus Galvan

          Yeah, you are right =) Except that most Linux distros are still using buttons on the right-hand side. It is Ubuntu’s prerogative where they want their buttons by default.

          • http://orkutcidio.deliriocoletivo.org Peterson Espaçoporto

            Yup, you’ve got a point. Still, metacity is flexible, I bet this border isn’t. Somebody using Arch could like the lefty layout…

          • http://orkutcidio.deliriocoletivo.org Peterson Espaçoporto

            Ah, just remembered: not to mention Netbook Edition. Will it respect D-Bus protocol and all the other things to make the global menu work and all that?

      • http://orkutcidio.deliriocoletivo.org Peterson Espaçoporto

        I actually use KDE =) But anyway, QT apps look awesome under gnome.

        The thing with window borders is that is not ONLY about beauty, is also functionality. What you’re going to do under Ubuntu? Keep ALL the window controls at the left and use them at the right ONLY with Spotify? Change them back? What if I like them being at the left? What’s going to happen when windicators come?

        It might seem minor, but this would be a huge annoyance. I want to close spotify, lalala… First time would be like “hahaha I forgot the buttons are there hehehe” by the fifth time you forget it you go like “GRRR goddamn devs who want this to look like a Mac OS app at all costs”.

    • http://twitter.com/chuche17 Jesus Galvan

      Dude it’s like saying you don’t like qt apps or anything non-gtk… That is just… too funny since the choice of window border manager is not always indicative of the quality of the apps themselves.

    • http://makariolewis.com Makario Lewis

      I understand where you’re coming from, but come on. At least Linux is getting Spotify.

      (But I too would appreciate uniformity.)

    • http://makariolewis.com Makario Lewis

      I understand where you’re coming from, but come on. At least Linux is getting Spotify.

      (But I too would appreciate uniformity.)

    • http://twitter.com/Eothred Yngve I. Levinsen

      I agree with you that it would be much better if they could try to integrate with KDE/Gnome etc. I am using KDE on Chakra linux myself, and I have to admit there are some design choices that makes it look quite out of place. That being said, I very much appreciate their effort, and will not even be close to ask them to go to hell. The design in the end, is their own choice to make, and their product still is the best streaming service I know of! I am happy to contribute my 10 euros/month to what can become a music revolution! :)

  • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

    Spotify… *sigh* Free version has advertisements, paid version is WAAAAYYY to expensive…

    • Carl

      “WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to expensive”…. dude.. it’s like one beer a month. or two depending on where you live. for unlimited music. but i suppose it’s all about priorities ;)

    • Carl

      “WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to expensive”…. dude.. it’s like one beer a month. or two depending on where you live. for unlimited music. but i suppose it’s all about priorities ;)

      • Dann2133

        no lol its like 1 crate of beer. where the hell have you seen 1 beer for £10

      • Dann2133

        no lol its like 1 crate of beer. where the hell have you seen 1 beer for £10

        • Martin

          What you can buy instead (Swedish examples, sry)
          2 beers in a Swedish bar,
          ~10 cheap beers bought from Systembolaget
          1 bought lunch in Stockholm
          2 rental dvd movies (3 if you’re lucky) for 24 hours.
          Maybe 1 CD.

          What you get:
          A lot of free music available on your phone and computer in fair quality (320kbps) available 24×365
          Invites for your friends to try the version with ads
          Fairly capable and lightweight cross-platform (alltough linux-support is in beta) music player which will play local files.
          Supposedly support for the artists you listen too.
          A music store where you can purchase songs or artist and download them without restrictions up to 5 times at a fair price.

          For me, it’s worth any one of the above per month.

          • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

            http://www.grooveshark.com

            What you can buy instead:- Nothing. You can’t buy things for free.What you get:- A lot of free music available on your phone* and computer in good quality (96-320kbps) available 24×365- Invites* for your friends to try out the version without ads, because the free version has no ads**- Fairly capable and light flash-based player in your browser wich will play local files*****, wich you can open EVERYWHERE, so people don’t have to download a client when you send them a link.- Fairly capable and light Air-based cross-platform music player**** wich will play local files*****- NO SUPPORT FOR TEH ARTIZT !!!11!!!!!1111!!1one- Links to music stores (iTunes and AmazonMP3) where you can purchase songs or artist and download them without restrictions up to unlimited times at a fair price* Not really invites, just links to songs, like http://tinysong.com/e84v** No audio ads between the music. It has one banner ad next to the player.*** For mobile support, you need a VIP account, wich doesn’t cost $10 a month but only $2,50 a month!**** For desktop support, you need a VIP account, wich doesn’t cost $10 a month but only $2,50 a month!***** It doens’t really play local files. But: if Grooveshark doesn’t have the song you want to play, you can just upload it.

        • Carl

          to clarify, i was talking about the “unlimited” account for ~€5. And like Martin said, that’s one beer in a bar :)

      • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

        You can also get unlimited music without paying $10 a month.

        • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

          oh, and i mean free WITHOUT ADS.

          • Martin

            Oh and you still support the artists which you listen to? (Yeah I know spotify doesn’t generate that much income for the artists, but it’s atleast a business model which can be agreed upon). I think it’s worth supporting. :]

          • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

            I don’t give a shit about the artists.

          • Ritch

            That might explain why no one gives a shit about you and your whiny ass.

          • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

            PWND :(

  • toruzz

    Oh wow, I made that icon! :P

  • lol

    Only avaliable in certain countries <<—- EPIC FAIL, SPOTIFY IS SH*T

    • Anonymous

      This can also be interpretted as “We don’t want to sacrifice the experience to comply with the laws of other countries, so those countries will simply have to use their own alternatives.”

      But I’m in the U.S., so I can’t say whether or not this is the case. :x

      • Giant Speck

        Yes. This is why, for now, Hulu and Pandora cannot legally offer their services to countries other than the United States and why BBC cannot legally offer their services to countries other than the United Kingdom. This is why some YouTube videos are only available in some countries. It’s all about laws, licenses, and fees.

        That said, I would love to be able to legally use Spotify in the United States and when the day comes that I can, I will definitely embrace the Linux version of the application.

  • Yi Sun-sin

    Already in AUR !

  • http://bededog.myopenid.com/ bededog

    Why couldn’t they make it integrate with your GTK theme? One of the big advantages of having a native GTK app is that it’s suppose to use your GTK theme. If an app doesn’t follow my GTK theme then if might as well be a wine app since it looks just as ugly and out of place.

  • http://bededog.myopenid.com/ bededog

    Why couldn’t they make it integrate with your GTK theme? One of the big advantages of having a native GTK app is that it’s suppose to use your GTK theme. If an app doesn’t follow my GTK theme then if might as well be a wine app since it looks just as ugly and out of place.

  • andy

    This has made my day :D It looks nice as native. Removed wine :D

  • andy

    This has made my day :D It looks nice as native. Removed wine :D

  • Anonymous

    It’s not “Popular music streaming service ‘Spotify’ have,” it’s “Popular music streaming service ‘Spotify’ has” >_< Same applies to Google, Foocorp, Geeknet Inc, etc.

  • Anonymous

    Spotify is available in the following countries:
    * Finland
    * France
    * Norway
    * Netherlands
    * Spain
    * Sweden
    * United Kingdom

    Lame, what about Australia.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/7GXJ4CL5A6A5YPPUO47UQXGP5Y Johan

    I’m amazed at how many people won’t pay $10 for a premium account

    • ActionParsnip

      EXACTLY!!!!

      • Lassegs

        Agreed. Maybe people dont understand that this is a completely different service than last.fm or pandora or the likes. $10/month is nothing for complete access to all the music in the world!

        • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/7GXJ4CL5A6A5YPPUO47UQXGP5Y Johan

          Well it’s not “all music in the world” but it sure is comprehensive.

          And sure, the problem is that people can tell Spotify apart from Last.fm or a similar service to that.

    • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk

      Why pay $10 a month when there are free/cheaper alternatives (free WITHOUT ads).

      • Anonymous

        Legal? That’s as good as spotify? I’d like to know where :)

        • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk
          • Anonymous

            I believe Grooveshark does use ads, they are on the side. Be careful when thinking things are free. If the revenue is directly from ads that the business uses to target consumers, then it is certainly not free. The price is your privacy and “user control” – lack of the control in the user’s hands means if they delete tracks and you don’t have a copy somewhere, you lose those tracks. There are ways to make something truely free (and yes, with a revenue stream of sorts).

          • http://luukdeleest.nl/ Luuk de Leest

            without audio ads*

      • Anonymous

        Legal? That’s as good as spotify? I’d like to know where :)

    • orb

      This is actually a social consideration, and has little to do with money.

  • Chris

    It would have been good if they’d made the Linux version a year ago, back when Spotify was actually popular.

  • Anonymous

    still can’t see why anyone would use why anyone would use spotify over grooveshark

  • diamondEyes

    This feels so good.

  • EXIT31

    Apparently it’s all about the looks and not about the technique?
    What’s going on here guys? Have any of you actually tried this piece of software?

  • http://twitter.com/olejonbj Ole Jon Bjørkum

    I don’t really understand those who don’t want to pay 10 euros a month for unlimited access to almost all music out there. In Norway it’s like one or two beers at a pub.

    The artists and bands doesn’t earn anything from the free version or Spotify in general at the moment. Lady Gaga got like 10 euros for one month or something.

    Here in Norway everyone uses Spotify and everyone loves it. I think their plan is to get everyone “addicted” with the free ad-version and then require everyone to pay like 5 euros a month or something. They probably can’t continue with the free version for long. They don’t earn money on it.

    I stopped buying music many years ago because of the prices on CDs. Pirating was my way of getting music for many years, but with Spotify, they have made a service that is modern and is usable for everyone. Now I pay more to the music industry than ever before. And it’s sooo worth it. Just having my music everywhere where I login is so great. And the Android-app is great and GOD I love offline playlists and support for local files. My Desire is much better with Spotify. The Spotify way is the future! I’m sure of it. I just hope the rest of the world can get access to it soon and see how great it is. Then competition will start and we can get the best prices and the best services. My guess is that in some years all multimedia (music, videos) is sold this way. People can buy unlimited access, or buy files straight from the service (so that they own it forever).

    Yes, I understand the UI complaints, but Spotify is like this on all platforms. A lot of users has asked for a Linux-version, and now they have delivered. Not many do that. The app work great (except on Pentium M so far), and is really functional to be a preview. Almost everything works just as on Windows and Mac. It seems like they are going to offer Linux-users the same experience as on Windows/Mac, which still is a bit unusual. It’s just great. I became very happy when I saw the headlines.

    I hope that they will fix local files, free version and integration soon. I believe they will. Let’s all support Spotify for what they’re doing, so that they are encouraged to develop for Linux. Let’s not just make them sick of Linux-users always complaining!

    For those who live in the countries where Spotify is available and have not tried it: Where the hell have you been the last couple of years? For you others: You might be skeptical, but I guarantee you, when you get access, you will love it, unless you have a very special/local music taste.

    I miss some bands like AC/DC, Metallica and Led Zeppelin (all my favourites), but that’s not Spotify’s fault. They have reserved themselves against streaming…

    • http://twitter.com/olejonbj Ole Jon Bjørkum

      I just want to add that Linux-users might be skeptical to paying a small amount a month because we’re used to getting things for free. Well, I have no problems supporting the artists and bands. They need money like all others to survive, especially the not-so-fameous.

      • http://cldx.blogspot.com/ Joern Konopka

        I just wanted to state that even due to being a Linux User i would never expect my Music to come flying in for free. Sure, sometimes you get a burned CD with some awesome tracks from a friend, you simply find free music or there are great offerings from Bands like NIN that go for free, but usually i go to the Store and buy my CD’s, theres nothing like a real CD in your Hands and sorry but it’s not like piracy of music and the CD Retail Prices are totally unconnected you know. I don’t wanna stand for the Record Companies cause mostly they are bloodsuckers but thats nowhere near justifying piracy.

        10 Bucks is an outstanding deal (as long as it works for Spotify that is, who knows what the future will bring)!

      • http://cldx.blogspot.com/ Joern Konopka

        I just wanted to state that even due to being a Linux User i would never expect my Music to come flying in for free. Sure, sometimes you get a burned CD with some awesome tracks from a friend, you simply find free music or there are great offerings from Bands like NIN that go for free, but usually i go to the Store and buy my CD’s, theres nothing like a real CD in your Hands and sorry but it’s not like piracy of music and the CD Retail Prices are totally unconnected you know. I don’t wanna stand for the Record Companies cause mostly they are bloodsuckers but thats nowhere near justifying piracy.

        10 Bucks is an outstanding deal (as long as it works for Spotify that is, who knows what the future will bring)!

    • Sir Rodness

      What? Give up my beer!?

  • Anonymous

    They don’t make a Windows 7 compatible UI either. They have done the art for the Mac and have just put it both in Windows and Linux.

    I don’t like it either, I much prefer consistency over fancy designs. But on the other I’m happy to see one more application using the title bar for the menu too, a design approach I’ve been advocating. I’m having my hopes on (the much hated) client side decorations that the S-man has hinted for Ubuntu not long ago (as a way to implement his windicators). Then someone will be able to create a theme using that approach.

  • Music listener

    Gnome-support does not work, relies on a newer gconf that we have in 10.04

  • haydoni

    Whoop! It’s now available for Spotify Unlimited “customers”!! :D

  • Ivan Romero III

    This is still exclusively western European, right? How big is the music selection? If it is just major labels, I don’t see the value. There’s not much there I want to here. I understand you can play your own music too, but then you need to own the music anyhow, so why bother paying 10 pounds a month to sync up your laptop and phone through spotify? Syncing it manually isn’t that difficult. I admit, though, I’ve never used the product. It could be far better than I imagine. If small label and unsigned artists are able to be paid and reach a global audience through this and similar products, I’ll get quite excited.

  • newbie

    i’M ubuntu newbie but just stuck it on acer aspire one and now i have spotify! Thanks verry much for the guidance

  • Anonymous

    A friend sent me an interesting article from the Australia Guardian News & Media that ran on the eve of the big Apple press conference. It got me thinking about why the industry needs Spotify.http://bit.ly/cqblv4

  • yoWzer

    The linux spotify client is great!

  • yoWzer

    The linux spotify client is great!

 
App