<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Lucid To Get New Scanning Tool â€˜Simple Scanâ€™</title> <atom:link href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%25e2%2580%2598simple-scan%25e2%2580%2599</link> <description>Everything Ubuntu. Daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: jzacsh</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33567</link> <dc:creator>jzacsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33567</guid> <description>whats wrong with xsane (other than screwed-up photoshop-window-layout it has) I like the features, and can&#039;t see whats so complex about it</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats wrong with xsane (other than screwed-up photoshop-window-layout it has) I like the features, and can&#8217;t see whats so complex about it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33482</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33482</guid> <description>Finally!Lucid sounds very promising. I just hope they will focus on stability too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!</p><p>Lucid sounds very promising. I just hope they will focus on stability too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yi Sun-sin</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33481</link> <dc:creator>Yi Sun-sin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33481</guid> <description>I heard they think Gnome-Scan is not stable enough, but I think it would have been better to improve Gnome-Scan. On the other hand, it seems that simple scan is only another UI for the same backend as xsane, ie sane, so since sane is mature and everything, it might be a good replacement solution, that might not require many efforts, until Gnome-Scan becomes better.By the way, on ther other hand, I&#039;ve heard that Gnome Scan does support more scanners than Xsane, so if any of you as troubles with simple-scan or xsane, give flegita a try ;â‹…).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard they think Gnome-Scan is not stable enough, but I think it would have been better to improve Gnome-Scan.<br /> On the other hand, it seems that simple scan is only another UI for the same backend as xsane, ie sane, so since sane is mature and everything, it might be a good replacement solution, that might not require many efforts, until Gnome-Scan becomes better.</p><p>By the way, on ther other hand, I&#8217;ve heard that Gnome Scan does support more scanners than Xsane, so if any of you as troubles with simple-scan or xsane, give flegita a try ;â‹…).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33480</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33480</guid> <description>Hm. I recall a nice scan app written in Python before that was very clean and user-friendly, but the author stopped development. Should&#039;ve picked that up...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. I recall a nice scan app written in Python before that was very clean and user-friendly, but the author stopped development. Should&#8217;ve picked that up&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deathclaw</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33479</link> <dc:creator>Deathclaw</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33479</guid> <description>Now, all I need is a scanner...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, all I need is a scanner&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miquel</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33478</link> <dc:creator>Miquel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33478</guid> <description>I use Gnome scan as well and I don&#039;t see why they haven&#039;t been using this instead of xscan in the first place nor why they&#039;re now reinventing the wheel.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Gnome scan as well and I don&#8217;t see why they haven&#8217;t been using this instead of xscan in the first place nor why they&#8217;re now reinventing the wheel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tomas</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33477</link> <dc:creator>tomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 09:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33477</guid> <description>Linux Mint using gnome scan ( http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-scan/ ) since version 6, which seems like a better alternative.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux Mint using gnome scan ( <a href="http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-scan/" rel="nofollow">http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-scan/</a> ) since version 6, which seems like a better alternative.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seif Sallam</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33476</link> <dc:creator>Seif Sallam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33476</guid> <description>i use Scanner Utility its simple and easy to use, i don&#039;t know why they are making another scanner application!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use Scanner Utility its simple and easy to use, i don&#8217;t know why they are making another scanner application!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mohan</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33475</link> <dc:creator>Mohan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33475</guid> <description>Wow, this is awesome news!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is awesome news!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Majd Mash</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33474</link> <dc:creator>Majd Mash</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33474</guid> <description>I think Ubuntu is on the right track here regarding the choice of programs, Shuttleworth is pushing forward of an OS that is stable, good-looking, and competes with OS X in terms of usability.....and then again, as a user you have the option of installing more advanced apps like GIMP and XSane...It&#039;s winner strategy honestly :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ubuntu is on the right track here regarding the choice of programs, Shuttleworth is pushing forward of an OS that is stable, good-looking, and competes with OS X in terms of usability.</p><p>&#8230;.and then again, as a user you have the option of installing more advanced apps like GIMP and XSane&#8230;</p><p>It&#8217;s winner strategy honestly :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sharkbait</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33473</link> <dc:creator>sharkbait</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33473</guid> <description>Oh thank god.  X-Sane is not sane; it&#039;s extremely confusing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh thank god.  X-Sane is not sane; it&#8217;s extremely confusing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Yi Sun-sin</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33471</link> <dc:creator>Yi Sun-sin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/12/lucid-to-get-new-scanning-tool-%e2%80%98simple-scan%e2%80%99/#comment-33471</guid> <description>I think I like better the Flegita/Gnome Scan alternative. The UI in Flegita is, in my opinion, clearer and less crowded.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I like better the Flegita/Gnome Scan alternative.<br /> The UI in Flegita is, in my opinion, clearer and less crowded.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 423/427 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.omgubuntu.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 22:26:40 -->
