<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Quick Hack To Get iPods Working With Banshee In Karmic</title> <atom:link href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic</link> <description>Everything Ubuntu. Daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Chris Lorieag</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-11232</link> <dc:creator>Chris Lorieag</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-11232</guid> <description>Oh gosh. It&#039;s you from the forum thread. It doesn&#039;t work for me. The iPod ejects fully and you need to plug it in again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gosh. It&#8217;s you from the forum thread. It doesn&#8217;t work for me. The iPod ejects fully and you need to plug it in again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tarek Sobh</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-9735</link> <dc:creator>Tarek Sobh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-9735</guid> <description>People!! You won&#039;t believe how stupid is the solution to this problem!! To solve this issue, open Rhythmbox and you&#039;ll find that the iPod is connected, right? Now, there is a button above in the menu that says &quot;Eject&quot;... Just click on that, close Rhythmbox and run the other application normally!! I tried it with Listen and it worked... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People!! You won&#8217;t believe how stupid is the solution to this problem!!<br /> To solve this issue, open Rhythmbox and you&#8217;ll find that the iPod is connected, right? Now, there is a button above in the menu that says &#8220;Eject&#8221;&#8230; Just click on that, close Rhythmbox and run the other application normally!! I tried it with Listen and it worked&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eduardo</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4594</link> <dc:creator>Eduardo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4594</guid> <description>Thank you!, it worked well with me!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!, it worked well with me!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4034</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4034</guid> <description>Glad it helped! It&#039;s not the most ideal of solutions, but it does the trick!Rhythmbox works fine with most iPods out of the box if you ever get desperate, though you have to manually &quot;drag n&#039; drop&quot; / manage. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad it helped! It&#8217;s not the most ideal of solutions, but it does the trick!</p><p>Rhythmbox works fine with most iPods out of the box if you ever get desperate, though you have to manually &#8220;drag n&#8217; drop&#8221; / manage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4030</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-4030</guid> <description>Wow! Thanks so  much for this! I bought my daughter a Nano for Christmas figuring it would work fine with Ubuntu and Banshee. After 2 hours of trying and failing to get it to work, I stumbled across this post. Dude, you pretty much saved Christmas! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thanks so  much for this! I bought my daughter a Nano for Christmas figuring it would work fine with Ubuntu and Banshee. After 2 hours of trying and failing to get it to work, I stumbled across this post. Dude, you pretty much saved Christmas!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-3932</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-3932</guid> <description>This worked for me, thanks. I&#039;m not too familiar with shell scripts, but I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a way to write one that will do this. Like:#!/bin/sh killall -9 nautilus [some command to wait until ipod is plugged in] nautilus bansheeAm I on the right path here?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This worked for me, thanks. I&#8217;m not too familiar with shell scripts, but I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a way to write one that will do this. Like:</p><p>#!/bin/sh<br /> killall -9 nautilus<br /> [some command to wait until ipod is plugged in]<br /> nautilus<br /> banshee</p><p>Am I on the right path here?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: fknrat</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-3607</link> <dc:creator>fknrat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-3607</guid> <description>holy jesus, it worked. Thank you so much, I was searching for the fix for about an hour until I happened across your post. For all the overly complicated &quot;fixes&quot; everyone else prescribed, your simple one actualyl did the trick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>holy jesus, it worked. Thank you so much, I was searching for the fix for about an hour until I happened across your post. For all the overly complicated &#8220;fixes&#8221; everyone else prescribed, your simple one actualyl did the trick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MLC</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2823</link> <dc:creator>MLC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2823</guid> <description>I hope it works, too. I get your point, and so does everyone else who uses/develops Linux. They&#039;re all for compatibility. I think the Banshee developers could&#039;ve taken a closer look at this, or whoever&#039;s in charge of maintaining the package. But you also should realize that, were it not for the open source community, a lot of the alternate iPod management programs even in Windows would exist at all- only iTunes. We&#039;re doing our best with something that could easily be solved if Apple acknowledged how many Linux users there definitely are, not to say how many there might be.But personally, I&#039;m glad we take this approach. It gives us more freedom. I&#039;m sure that, very soon, we won&#039;t have these issues at all. This is just one release, after all. They have iPod Touch and iPhone syncing ready now, just needs to work out the kinks and be packaged with distros. So I think this will be a very minimal issue, in the long run. I still think it&#039;s stupid that a working program should suddenly not be as functional, though. If someone&#039;s iPod is the main thing they love, and they don&#039;t wanna&#039; use gtkpod, qtpod, rhythmbox, or amarok, they should be able to use Banshee as they have in the past.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it works, too. I get your point, and so does everyone else who uses/develops Linux. They&#8217;re all for compatibility. I think the Banshee developers could&#8217;ve taken a closer look at this, or whoever&#8217;s in charge of maintaining the package. But you also should realize that, were it not for the open source community, a lot of the alternate iPod management programs even in Windows would exist at all- only iTunes. We&#8217;re doing our best with something that could easily be solved if Apple acknowledged how many Linux users there definitely are, not to say how many there might be.</p><p>But personally, I&#8217;m glad we take this approach. It gives us more freedom. I&#8217;m sure that, very soon, we won&#8217;t have these issues at all. This is just one release, after all. They have iPod Touch and iPhone syncing ready now, just needs to work out the kinks and be packaged with distros. So I think this will be a very minimal issue, in the long run. I still think it&#8217;s stupid that a working program should suddenly not be as functional, though. If someone&#8217;s iPod is the main thing they love, and they don&#8217;t wanna&#8217; use gtkpod, qtpod, rhythmbox, or amarok, they should be able to use Banshee as they have in the past.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MLC</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2824</link> <dc:creator>MLC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2824</guid> <description>I hope it works, too. I get your point, and so does everyone else who uses/develops Linux. They&#039;re all for compatibility. I think the Banshee developers could&#039;ve taken a closer look at this, or whoever&#039;s in charge of maintaining the package. But you also should realize that, were it not for the open source community, a lot of the alternate iPod management programs even in Windows would exist at all- only iTunes. We&#039;re doing our best with something that could easily be solved if Apple acknowledged how many Linux users there definitely are, not to say how many there might be.But personally, I&#039;m glad we take this approach. It gives us more freedom. I&#039;m sure that, very soon, we won&#039;t have these issues at all. This is just one release, after all. They have iPod Touch and iPhone syncing ready now, just needs to work out the kinks and be packaged with distros. So I think this will be a very minimal issue, in the long run. I still think it&#039;s stupid that a working program should suddenly not be as functional, though. If someone&#039;s iPod is the main thing they love, and they don&#039;t wanna&#039; use gtkpod, qtpod, rhythmbox, or amarok, they should be able to use Banshee as they have in the past.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it works, too. I get your point, and so does everyone else who uses/develops Linux. They&#8217;re all for compatibility. I think the Banshee developers could&#8217;ve taken a closer look at this, or whoever&#8217;s in charge of maintaining the package. But you also should realize that, were it not for the open source community, a lot of the alternate iPod management programs even in Windows would exist at all- only iTunes. We&#8217;re doing our best with something that could easily be solved if Apple acknowledged how many Linux users there definitely are, not to say how many there might be.</p><p>But personally, I&#8217;m glad we take this approach. It gives us more freedom. I&#8217;m sure that, very soon, we won&#8217;t have these issues at all. This is just one release, after all. They have iPod Touch and iPhone syncing ready now, just needs to work out the kinks and be packaged with distros. So I think this will be a very minimal issue, in the long run. I still think it&#8217;s stupid that a working program should suddenly not be as functional, though. If someone&#8217;s iPod is the main thing they love, and they don&#8217;t wanna&#8217; use gtkpod, qtpod, rhythmbox, or amarok, they should be able to use Banshee as they have in the past.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2819</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2819</guid> <description>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#039;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &quot;killall nautilus&quot; then plug something in then &quot;start nautilus&quot; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &quot;just work.&quot; It&#039;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.Just my $0.02. I don&#039;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#039;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#039;t that way yet.I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#039;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#8217;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &#8220;killall nautilus&#8221; then plug something in then &#8220;start nautilus&#8221; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &#8220;just work.&#8221; It&#8217;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.</p><p>Just my $0.02. I don&#8217;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#8217;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#8217;t that way yet.</p><p>I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#8217;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2820</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2820</guid> <description>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#039;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &quot;killall nautilus&quot; then plug something in then &quot;start nautilus&quot; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &quot;just work.&quot; It&#039;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.Just my $0.02. I don&#039;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#039;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#039;t that way yet.I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#039;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#8217;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &#8220;killall nautilus&#8221; then plug something in then &#8220;start nautilus&#8221; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &#8220;just work.&#8221; It&#8217;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.</p><p>Just my $0.02. I don&#8217;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#8217;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#8217;t that way yet.</p><p>I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#8217;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2817</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2817</guid> <description>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#039;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &quot;killall nautilus&quot; then plug something in then &quot;start nautilus&quot; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &quot;just work.&quot; It&#039;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.Just my $0.02. I don&#039;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#039;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#039;t that way yet.I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#039;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#8217;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &#8220;killall nautilus&#8221; then plug something in then &#8220;start nautilus&#8221; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &#8220;just work.&#8221; It&#8217;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.</p><p>Just my $0.02. I don&#8217;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#8217;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#8217;t that way yet.</p><p>I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#8217;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2818</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2818</guid> <description>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#039;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &quot;killall nautilus&quot; then plug something in then &quot;start nautilus&quot; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &quot;just work.&quot; It&#039;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.Just my $0.02. I don&#039;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#039;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#039;t that way yet.I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#039;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an Ubuntu fanatic, I gotta say that this really sucks. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love Ubuntu, but it&#8217;s purpose is being a main-stream operating system. Tell any casual computer user to &#8220;killall nautilus&#8221; then plug something in then &#8220;start nautilus&#8221; again is crazy. Things like using an iPod with Linux, you know, things normal people do, need to &#8220;just work.&#8221; It&#8217;s not unrealistic to expect to plug in your iPod and have a notification pop up asking if you want to sync it with a media player.</p><p>Just my $0.02. I don&#8217;t even use an iPod (proprietary piece of crap), but imagine a non-tech-savvy person trying to do this. One mention of the terminal and they run crying/screaming to Windows/Mac. I wish it weren&#8217;t that way. I wish people would actually use their brains and overcome their fear of the terminal, but it isn&#8217;t that way yet.</p><p>I can understand having to do something like this in Debian, because Debian isn&#8217;t targeting the average user. However, Ubuntu IS targeting the average user, so this is where the problem arises. Are there going to be bugs that need to be ironed out? OF COURSE. But we really need to focus on making everything idiot-proof. So, as a developer, I really hope that Ubuntu will keep moving toward an operating system that simply and reliably works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MLC</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2669</link> <dc:creator>MLC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2669</guid> <description>Actually, the work is almost done getting these to work by default in Linux. http://marcansoft.com/blog/2009/10/iphone-syncing-on-linux/ Should appear in Lynx if we&#039;re lucky.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the work is almost done getting these to work by default in Linux. <a href="http://marcansoft.com/blog/2009/10/iphone-syncing-on-linux/" rel="nofollow">http://marcansoft.com/blog/2009/10/iphone-syncing-on-linux/</a> Should appear in Lynx if we&#8217;re lucky.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mauro</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2629</link> <dc:creator>Mauro</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2629</guid> <description>Same here... my ipod touch is the reason of VirtualBox :( ... Just That!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here&#8230; my ipod touch is the reason of VirtualBox :( &#8230; Just That!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jon Rogers</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2623</link> <dc:creator>Jon Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2623</guid> <description>I use songbird for my ipod (and all my music playing when not on spotify) and instead of doing this I manually mount the ipod to a non-default mount-point, then songbird gets it. This would work the same as logging out and in with the device connected.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use songbird for my ipod (and all my music playing when not on spotify) and instead of doing this I manually mount the ipod to a non-default mount-point, then songbird gets it. This would work the same as logging out and in with the device connected.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2622</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2622</guid> <description>I believe it&#039;s to kill a non-responding application... Doesn&#039;t really need to be there i guess.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe it&#8217;s to kill a non-responding application&#8230; Doesn&#8217;t really need to be there i guess.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2621</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2621</guid> <description>Thanks for the tip! That&#039;s been bugging me. Any idea what the &quot;-9&quot; switch is for? I didn&#039;t see that listed in killall -help.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip! That&#8217;s been bugging me. Any idea what the &#8220;-9&#8243; switch is for? I didn&#8217;t see that listed in killall -help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mraz</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2620</link> <dc:creator>mraz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2620</guid> <description>Thank you!! I was going crazy wondering why my ipod wasn&#039;t being recognized! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!! I was going crazy wondering why my ipod wasn&#8217;t being recognized!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2619</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/quick-hack-to-get-ipods-working-with-banshee-in-karmic/#comment-2619</guid> <description>I&#039;ve heard that plugging your iPod in, logging out, logging in again and then starting songbird works. (?!) I&#039;ll have a proper dig for something a bit more plausible sounding - but try it anyway! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that plugging your iPod in, logging out, logging in again and then starting songbird works. (?!) I&#8217;ll have a proper dig for something a bit more plausible sounding &#8211; but try it anyway!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 511/515 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.omgubuntu.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 20:56:44 -->
