<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: PiTiVi On Course To Become A Default Application In Lucid</title> <atom:link href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid</link> <description>Everything Ubuntu. Daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Frank</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3225</link> <dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3225</guid> <description>Come on guys... you can&#039;t ship by default an FFMPEG based project in a distro for all the licenses issues. That&#039;s why they have chosen pitivi </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on guys&#8230; you can&#8217;t ship by default an FFMPEG based project in a distro for all the licenses issues. That&#8217;s why they have chosen pitivi</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3226</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3226</guid> <description>Indeed why? Subject: 	[omgubuntu] Re: PiTiVi On Course To Become A Default Applications... Date: 	11/20/2009 04:25:28 AM (Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:25:28 -0000)Edward Hervey (unregistered) wrote:what a depressing post (in some aspects). I&#039;ll answer the various questions/comments/rants all the same.* PiTiVi doesn&#039;t support DV/mpeg4/whatever-format Where did you get that idea from ? PiTiVi doesn&#039;t come shipped with codecs, it relies on GStreamer to provide the needed plugins/decoders/etc... If you load a DV file in pitivi and you don&#039;t have the plugins, the application missing-plugin system should appear proposing you to download the needed plugin.* Collabora pushed PiTiVi aggresively into ubuntu That&#039;s 100% totally wrong. I personally had chats with Jono and Rick Spencer about having PiTiVi shipped as a default application, and canonical were interested by the idea of having a video editor shipped by default. All of this was far from being enforced, or us (Collabora) going out of our way to have PiTiVi shipped by default. And nothing&#039;s engraved in stone at this point. If we (pitivi development team) get feedback/help on improving what&#039;s bothering people by the Lucid release date and people deem it good enough to be shipped by default, great ! If we get no help... well.. PiTiVi won&#039;t die and people will still be able to use it via PPAs.* Why ship PiTiVi as default app and not another video editor I&#039;d say the main reason is that all the dependencies (except for goocanvas, which is pretty slim) are already shipped by default : GStreamer, GTK, python. All the other editors would require bringing in more dependencies. I&#039;ll let Canonical/Ubuntu confirm that or not.* lack of features ... On this part we have always taken the stand of making sure features are as solid as possible before adding new features. In terms of video editing, that means you do need to have input/output format support rock solid, trimming/cutting rock solid. Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/... out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don&#039;t. The two features we find critically missing are : video transitions and overlaying. I just merged yesterday the videomixing branch yesterday to master which enables setting transparency on every video streams (like Sony Vegas does). It still has some issues, but having it in master will force/speedup the bugfixing process. Video effects are not a top-priority. Getting those... without being able to do the features above are pointless. We won&#039;t diverge from that point of view. Helping us get the above rock solid as fast as possible ... will mean you will see video effects faster.* To people throwing generic rants about  sucking Write a video editor (or any non-trivial multimedia applicatoin), then come back and rant about other people&#039;s application sucking. Then we might have a proper discussion. In the meantime... you&#039;re not improving the situation.* PiTiVi is dead or no longer maintained The 3 main developers (who also happen to be hired by Collabora and that includes myself) have been working on some other company work in the meantime. Keeping Collabora hiring those 3 developers, means ensuring they have time to be paid to work on it also. (I&#039;d personnaly love to have people working 100% of the time on PiTiVi ... but you need to take into account the reality of running a business). We&#039;re progressively getting more company time for PiTiVi (Brandon has been back on it full time for the past frew weeks for example). It&#039;s far from being abandoned/dead, just that we do it at our own pace. It&#039;s freely available (LGPL, no copryight attributions required) and will always stay that way. We always welcome contributions and are pretty fast to review/commit patches.Drop in on #pitivi on irc.freenode.net or send us a mail on pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net and come and give your feedback, what can be improved, what&#039;s good and should be kept and ... who knows ... be part of the pitivi team :)Edward Hervey: PiTiVi creator/maintainer, GStreamer hacker, Collabora Multimedia co-directorLink to comment: http://disq.us/43ri7</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed why?<br /> Subject: 	[omgubuntu] Re: PiTiVi On Course To Become A Default Applications&#8230;<br /> Date: 	11/20/2009 04:25:28 AM (Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:25:28 -0000)</p><p>Edward Hervey (unregistered) wrote:</p><p>what a depressing post (in some aspects). I&#8217;ll answer the various questions/comments/rants all the same.</p><p>* PiTiVi doesn&#8217;t support DV/mpeg4/whatever-format<br /> Where did you get that idea from ? PiTiVi doesn&#8217;t come shipped with codecs, it relies on GStreamer to provide the needed plugins/decoders/etc&#8230; If you load a DV file in pitivi and you don&#8217;t have the plugins, the application missing-plugin system should appear proposing you to download the needed plugin.</p><p>* Collabora pushed PiTiVi aggresively into ubuntu<br /> That&#8217;s 100% totally wrong. I personally had chats with Jono and Rick Spencer about having PiTiVi shipped as a default application, and canonical were interested by the idea of having a video editor shipped by default. All of this was far from being enforced, or us (Collabora) going out of our way to have PiTiVi shipped by default. And nothing&#8217;s engraved in stone at this point. If we (pitivi development team) get feedback/help on improving what&#8217;s bothering people by the Lucid release date and people deem it good enough to be shipped by default, great ! If we get no help&#8230; well.. PiTiVi won&#8217;t die and people will still be able to use it via PPAs.</p><p>* Why ship PiTiVi as default app and not another video editor<br /> I&#8217;d say the main reason is that all the dependencies (except for goocanvas, which is pretty slim) are already shipped by default : GStreamer, GTK, python. All the other editors would require bringing in more dependencies. I&#8217;ll let Canonical/Ubuntu confirm that or not.</p><p>* lack of features &#8230;<br /> On this part we have always taken the stand of making sure features are as solid as possible before adding new features. In terms of video editing, that means you do need to have input/output format support rock solid, trimming/cutting rock solid. Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/&#8230; out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don&#8217;t.<br /> The two features we find critically missing are : video transitions and overlaying. I just merged yesterday the videomixing branch yesterday to master which enables setting transparency on every video streams (like Sony Vegas does). It still has some issues, but having it in master will force/speedup the bugfixing process.<br /> Video effects are not a top-priority. Getting those&#8230; without being able to do the features above are pointless. We won&#8217;t diverge from that point of view. Helping us get the above rock solid as fast as possible &#8230; will mean you will see video effects faster.</p><p>* To people throwing generic rants about  sucking<br /> Write a video editor (or any non-trivial multimedia applicatoin), then come back and rant about other people&#8217;s application sucking. Then we might have a proper discussion. In the meantime&#8230; you&#8217;re not improving the situation.</p><p>* PiTiVi is dead or no longer maintained<br /> The 3 main developers (who also happen to be hired by Collabora and that includes myself) have been working on some other company work in the meantime. Keeping Collabora hiring those 3 developers, means ensuring they have time to be paid to work on it also. (I&#8217;d personnaly love to have people working 100% of the time on PiTiVi &#8230; but you need to take into account the reality of running a business).<br /> We&#8217;re progressively getting more company time for PiTiVi (Brandon has been back on it full time for the past frew weeks for example). It&#8217;s far from being abandoned/dead, just that we do it at our own pace. It&#8217;s freely available (LGPL, no copryight attributions required) and will always stay that way. We always welcome contributions and are pretty fast to review/commit patches.</p><p>Drop in on #pitivi on irc.freenode.net or send us a mail on <a href="mailto:pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net">pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net</a> and come and give your feedback, what can be improved, what&#8217;s good and should be kept and &#8230; who knows &#8230; be part of the pitivi team :)</p><p>Edward Hervey: PiTiVi creator/maintainer, GStreamer hacker, Collabora Multimedia co-director</p><p>Link to comment: <a href="http://disq.us/43ri7" rel="nofollow">http://disq.us/43ri7</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andoni</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3224</link> <dc:creator>Andoni</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3224</guid> <description>Why did you delete Edward&#039;s comment?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you delete Edward&#8217;s comment?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Hervey</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3212</link> <dc:creator>Edward Hervey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3212</guid> <description>what a depressing post (in some aspects). I&#039;ll answer the various questions/comments/rants all the same.* PiTiVi doesn&#039;t support DV/mpeg4/whatever-format Where did you get that idea from ? PiTiVi doesn&#039;t come shipped with codecs, it relies on GStreamer to provide the needed plugins/decoders/etc... If you load a DV file in pitivi and you don&#039;t have the plugins, the application missing-plugin system should appear proposing you to download the needed plugin.* Collabora pushed PiTiVi aggresively into ubuntu That&#039;s 100% totally wrong. I personally had chats with Jono and Rick Spencer about having PiTiVi shipped as a default application, and canonical were interested by the idea of having a video editor shipped by default. All of this was far from being enforced, or us (Collabora) going out of our way to have PiTiVi shipped by default. And nothing&#039;s engraved in stone at this point. If we (pitivi development team) get feedback/help on improving what&#039;s bothering people by the Lucid release date and people deem it good enough to be shipped by default, great ! If we get no help... well.. PiTiVi won&#039;t die and people will still be able to use it via PPAs.* Why ship PiTiVi as default app and not another video editor I&#039;d say the main reason is that all the dependencies (except for goocanvas, which is pretty slim) are already shipped by default : GStreamer, GTK, python. All the other editors would require bringing in more dependencies. I&#039;ll let Canonical/Ubuntu confirm that or not.* lack of features ... On this part we have always taken the stand of making sure features are as solid as possible before adding new features. In terms of video editing, that means you do need to have input/output format support rock solid, trimming/cutting rock solid. Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/... out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don&#039;t. The two features we find critically missing are : video transitions and overlaying. I just merged yesterday the videomixing branch yesterday to master which enables setting transparency on every video streams (like Sony Vegas does). It still has some issues, but having it in master will force/speedup the bugfixing process. Video effects are not a top-priority. Getting those... without being able to do the features above are pointless. We won&#039;t diverge from that point of view. Helping us get the above rock solid as fast as possible ... will mean you will see video effects faster.* To people throwing generic rants about  sucking Write a video editor (or any non-trivial multimedia applicatoin), then come back and rant about other people&#039;s application sucking. Then we might have a proper discussion. In the meantime... you&#039;re not improving the situation.* PiTiVi is dead or no longer maintained The 3 main developers (who also happen to be hired by Collabora and that includes myself) have been working on some other company work in the meantime. Keeping Collabora hiring those 3 developers, means ensuring they have time to be paid to work on it also. (I&#039;d personnaly love to have people working 100% of the time on PiTiVi ... but you need to take into account the reality of running a business). We&#039;re progressively getting more company time for PiTiVi (Brandon has been back on it full time for the past frew weeks for example). It&#039;s far from being abandoned/dead, just that we do it at our own pace. It&#039;s freely available (LGPL, no copryight attributions required) and will always stay that way. We always welcome contributions and are pretty fast to review/commit patches.Drop in on #pitivi on irc.freenode.net or send us a mail on pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net and come and give your feedback, what can be improved, what&#039;s good and should be kept and ... who knows ... be part of the pitivi team :)Edward Hervey: PiTiVi creator/maintainer, GStreamer hacker, Collabora Multimedia co-director</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what a depressing post (in some aspects). I&#8217;ll answer the various questions/comments/rants all the same.</p><p>* PiTiVi doesn&#8217;t support DV/mpeg4/whatever-format<br /> Where did you get that idea from ? PiTiVi doesn&#8217;t come shipped with codecs, it relies on GStreamer to provide the needed plugins/decoders/etc&#8230; If you load a DV file in pitivi and you don&#8217;t have the plugins, the application missing-plugin system should appear proposing you to download the needed plugin.</p><p>* Collabora pushed PiTiVi aggresively into ubuntu<br /> That&#8217;s 100% totally wrong. I personally had chats with Jono and Rick Spencer about having PiTiVi shipped as a default application, and canonical were interested by the idea of having a video editor shipped by default. All of this was far from being enforced, or us (Collabora) going out of our way to have PiTiVi shipped by default. And nothing&#8217;s engraved in stone at this point. If we (pitivi development team) get feedback/help on improving what&#8217;s bothering people by the Lucid release date and people deem it good enough to be shipped by default, great ! If we get no help&#8230; well.. PiTiVi won&#8217;t die and people will still be able to use it via PPAs.</p><p>* Why ship PiTiVi as default app and not another video editor<br /> I&#8217;d say the main reason is that all the dependencies (except for goocanvas, which is pretty slim) are already shipped by default : GStreamer, GTK, python. All the other editors would require bringing in more dependencies. I&#8217;ll let Canonical/Ubuntu confirm that or not.</p><p>* lack of features &#8230;<br /> On this part we have always taken the stand of making sure features are as solid as possible before adding new features. In terms of video editing, that means you do need to have input/output format support rock solid, trimming/cutting rock solid. Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/&#8230; out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don&#8217;t.<br /> The two features we find critically missing are : video transitions and overlaying. I just merged yesterday the videomixing branch yesterday to master which enables setting transparency on every video streams (like Sony Vegas does). It still has some issues, but having it in master will force/speedup the bugfixing process.<br /> Video effects are not a top-priority. Getting those&#8230; without being able to do the features above are pointless. We won&#8217;t diverge from that point of view. Helping us get the above rock solid as fast as possible &#8230; will mean you will see video effects faster.</p><p>* To people throwing generic rants about  sucking<br /> Write a video editor (or any non-trivial multimedia applicatoin), then come back and rant about other people&#8217;s application sucking. Then we might have a proper discussion. In the meantime&#8230; you&#8217;re not improving the situation.</p><p>* PiTiVi is dead or no longer maintained<br /> The 3 main developers (who also happen to be hired by Collabora and that includes myself) have been working on some other company work in the meantime. Keeping Collabora hiring those 3 developers, means ensuring they have time to be paid to work on it also. (I&#8217;d personnaly love to have people working 100% of the time on PiTiVi &#8230; but you need to take into account the reality of running a business).<br /> We&#8217;re progressively getting more company time for PiTiVi (Brandon has been back on it full time for the past frew weeks for example). It&#8217;s far from being abandoned/dead, just that we do it at our own pace. It&#8217;s freely available (LGPL, no copryight attributions required) and will always stay that way. We always welcome contributions and are pretty fast to review/commit patches.</p><p>Drop in on #pitivi on irc.freenode.net or send us a mail on <a href="mailto:pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net">pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net</a> and come and give your feedback, what can be improved, what&#8217;s good and should be kept and &#8230; who knows &#8230; be part of the pitivi team :)</p><p>Edward Hervey: PiTiVi creator/maintainer, GStreamer hacker, Collabora Multimedia co-director</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3191</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3191</guid> <description>Bad move.Latest pitivi is completely broken in git, and nobody has time to work on it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad move.</p><p>Latest pitivi is completely broken in git, and nobody has time to work on it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FabriceV</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3188</link> <dc:creator>FabriceV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3188</guid> <description>Lets the jaunty bugs behind and unassigned... You post about Cannonical or about OpenShot???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets the jaunty bugs behind and unassigned&#8230; You post about Cannonical or about OpenShot???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FabriceV</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3187</link> <dc:creator>FabriceV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3187</guid> <description>If your presentation is true, then you inform us that a group of silly people make decision just based on their opinion at the time of one meeting. Effectively the GUI of OpenShot was ugly... But it WAS improved, and no one prevent to give advice to correct the smaller problems that are still present. Sure, PiTIVI will be stable... Useless and stable... This is the advantage of outdated software with slow development.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your presentation is true, then you inform us that a group of silly people make decision just based on their opinion at the time of one meeting. Effectively the GUI of OpenShot was ugly&#8230; But it WAS improved, and no one prevent to give advice to correct the smaller problems that are still present. Sure, PiTIVI will be stable&#8230; Useless and stable&#8230; This is the advantage of outdated software with slow development.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3182</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3182</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been frustrated, as well.  I really, really want it to work!  I have to say, though, that when I had a major issue a couple of months ago, I received lots of attention from the two developers in a forum thread as they worked to get it running on my system.  Though it didn&#039;t get resolved, they score big points for caring so much!And I just tried using it again after a couple of months of no-go, and it seems to be working for me, at least for now.  Not sure what changed, but if I could freeze everything as-is, I would!  It&#039;s the on-again, off-again that makes me nervous.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been frustrated, as well.  I really, really want it to work!  I have to say, though, that when I had a major issue a couple of months ago, I received lots of attention from the two developers in a forum thread as they worked to get it running on my system.  Though it didn&#8217;t get resolved, they score big points for caring so much!</p><p>And I just tried using it again after a couple of months of no-go, and it seems to be working for me, at least for now.  Not sure what changed, but if I could freeze everything as-is, I would!  It&#8217;s the on-again, off-again that makes me nervous.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3177</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3177</guid> <description>Sorry, but I have to agree with the UI comment-- OpenShot looks like it&#039;s made of blue balloon animals!  It&#039;s also not very stable for me, though currently, it seems to be working (keeping fingers crossed!).  There are a lot of things already in place in OpenShot that need to be improved, whereas in PiTiVi, those things haven&#039;t been added yet... maybe that&#039;s part of the Ubuntu team&#039;s thinking?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I have to agree with the UI comment&#8211; OpenShot looks like it&#8217;s made of blue balloon animals!  It&#8217;s also not very stable for me, though currently, it seems to be working (keeping fingers crossed!).  There are a lot of things already in place in OpenShot that need to be improved, whereas in PiTiVi, those things haven&#8217;t been added yet&#8230; maybe that&#8217;s part of the Ubuntu team&#8217;s thinking?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3172</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3172</guid> <description>The .debs from the official site don&#039;t have this issue so it is safe to get OpenShot that way, also the bleeding-edge PPA is also free from this &quot;bug&quot;https://launchpad.net/~jonoomph/+archive/openshot-edge</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .debs from the official site don&#8217;t have this issue so it is safe to get OpenShot that way, also the bleeding-edge PPA is also free from this &#8220;bug&#8221;</p><p><a href="https://launchpad.net/~jonoomph/+archive/openshot-edge" rel="nofollow">https://launchpad.net/~jonoomph/+archive/openshot-edge</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexandra Jau</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3170</link> <dc:creator>Alexandra Jau</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3170</guid> <description>Checked out OpenShot and was just about to install when I read the following:&quot;WARNING: Our PPA uses a special version of FFmpeg, which does not work with VLC &amp; Totem, and a few other movie players. This is due to how we are packaging FFmpeg in our PPA. We are working to fix this, but if you install via the PPA, you will not be able to run VLC at this time&quot;Thanks, but no thanks. I need VLC.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checked out OpenShot and was just about to install when I read the following:</p><p>&#8220;WARNING: Our PPA uses a special version of FFmpeg, which does not work with VLC &amp; Totem, and a few other movie players. This is due to how we are packaging FFmpeg in our PPA. We are working to fix this, but if you install via the PPA, you will not be able to run VLC at this time&#8221;</p><p>Thanks, but no thanks. I need VLC.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ben</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3155</link> <dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3155</guid> <description>:( First the GIMP is going and now PiTiVi is being chosen over Open Shot. I really hope that they change their minds on both matters and that they stop comparing to windows! Ubuntu shouldn&#039;t be a distro designed specifically for new converts, it should be a distro designed to be unique! Maybe I&#039;m going over the top but it seems to me like Ubuntu is heading towards becoming a distro for helping windows users recover from the trauma of their prior OS.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:( First the GIMP is going and now PiTiVi is being chosen over Open Shot. I really hope that they change their minds on both matters and that they stop comparing to windows! Ubuntu shouldn&#8217;t be a distro designed specifically for new converts, it should be a distro designed to be unique! Maybe I&#8217;m going over the top but it seems to me like Ubuntu is heading towards becoming a distro for helping windows users recover from the trauma of their prior OS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mel</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3129</link> <dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3129</guid> <description>Just because a company is behind a project doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s good. Sometimes companies make things even worse, because all they want is money after all.A passionate team of developers that put their hearts in their projects, sometimes or most of the times, make better projects. And they really listen to their communities, that counts!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a company is behind a project doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s good. Sometimes companies make things even worse, because all they want is money after all.</p><p>A passionate team of developers that put their hearts in their projects, sometimes or most of the times, make better projects. And they really listen to their communities, that counts!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimbo</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3125</link> <dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3125</guid> <description>TBF, if they stick PiTiVi in the alphas and everyone says they hate it and it crashes all the time they will take it out again. Its not all doom and gloom with Ubuntu destined to ship a terrible app and nothing we can do about it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBF, if they stick PiTiVi in the alphas and everyone says they hate it and it crashes all the time they will take it out again. Its not all doom and gloom with Ubuntu destined to ship a terrible app and nothing we can do about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Daniel de Souza Telles</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3121</link> <dc:creator>Daniel de Souza Telles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3121</guid> <description>Watta political decision! I agree with you swap GIMP with PiTiVi was a bad, very bad move.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watta political decision! I agree with you swap GIMP with PiTiVi was a bad, very bad move.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: daas88</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3120</link> <dc:creator>daas88</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3120</guid> <description>just an advice: when you install openshot, don&#039;t add the ppa, just download the .debs. I tried it days ago and i had to remove the repo and downgrade some packages that openshot had updated, because i couldn&#039;t watch any video in any video player...But downloading the debs have worked fine for me!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just an advice: when you install openshot, don&#8217;t add the ppa, just download the .debs.<br /> I tried it days ago and i had to remove the repo and downgrade some packages that openshot had updated, because i couldn&#8217;t watch any video in any video player&#8230;</p><p>But downloading the debs have worked fine for me!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: d0od</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3117</link> <dc:creator>d0od</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3117</guid> <description>This why i don&#039;t entirely understand the &quot;emphasis&quot; they&#039;re putting on PiTiVi, especially when deriding OpenShot at the same time. I&#039;m sensing it has more to do with the company behind Collabora than the merits of PiTiVi.To think PiTiVi has two paid developers and OpenShot has none yet look at which is better... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This why i don&#8217;t entirely understand the &#8220;emphasis&#8221; they&#8217;re putting on PiTiVi, especially when deriding OpenShot at the same time. I&#8217;m sensing it has more to do with the company behind Collabora than the merits of PiTiVi.</p><p>To think PiTiVi has two paid developers and OpenShot has none yet look at which is better&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mel</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3115</link> <dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3115</guid> <description>I tried Pitivi and OpenShot. Both sucked, but it was an old OpenShot version and it crashed too much. Pitivi has nothing, it&#039;s really crappy at this time, and come on, no effects? That&#039;s really crappy. I&#039;m gonna give OpenShot a try again.By the looks on the screenshot Pitivi is the one with a bad UI, OpenShot looks more modern and sleeker.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Pitivi and OpenShot. Both sucked, but it was an old OpenShot version and it crashed too much. Pitivi has nothing, it&#8217;s really crappy at this time, and come on, no effects? That&#8217;s really crappy. I&#8217;m gonna give OpenShot a try again.</p><p>By the looks on the screenshot Pitivi is the one with a bad UI, OpenShot looks more modern and sleeker.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rgz</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3114</link> <dc:creator>rgz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3114</guid> <description>100% agreed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agreed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3111</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/11/pitivi-on-course-to-become-a-default-application-in-lucid/#comment-3111</guid> <description>LOL. piti-tv still looks like it did 2 years ago. That should be a default app? Hell freezes over.. OpenShot for president! Give that pitititv guy something else to work on. Dunno, something in /dev/null?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. piti-tv still looks like it did 2 years ago. That should be a default app? Hell freezes over.. OpenShot for president!<br /> Give that pitititv guy something else to work on. Dunno, something in /dev/null?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 511/515 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.omgubuntu.co.uk @ 2012-02-09 21:20:01 -->
