PiTiVi Creator Responds To Readers Fears…

Earlier today Edward Hervey of the PiTiVi team responded to my previous post regarding PiTiVi becoming a default application in Ubuntu.


His response was very well mannered and addressed many of the concerns both I and readers had concerning PiTiVi’s' potential inclusion in the default set of applications in Ubuntu. So much so I decided to whisk it from the murky depths of disqus and post it here so more people could read his response!


This is the reason comments were closed off from the previous post; so they may continue here with his response informing any further discussion.


May I also remind reads that this site is run, written & sourced by ONE person [myself] and personal insults are not appreciated. You are not forced to read this blog.





What a depressing post (in some aspects). I’ll answer the various questions/comments/rants all the same.

Re: PiTiVi doesn’t support DV/mpeg4/whatever-format

Where did you get that idea from ? PiTiVi doesn’t come shipped with codecs, it relies on GStreamer to provide the needed plugins/decoders/etc… If you load a DV file in pitivi and you don’t have the plugins, the application missing-plugin system should appear proposing you to download the needed plugin.


(I will reply on this: I personally got this “idea” from the UDS09 meeting where this was raised. I have, personally, had issues with formats in PiTiVi so one can understand why this issue comes up.) 

Re: Collabora pushed PiTiVi aggresively into ubuntu
 That’s 100% totally wrong. I personally had chats with Jono and Rick Spencer about having PiTiVi shipped as a default application, and canonical were interested by the idea of having a video editor shipped by default. All of this was far from being enforced, or us (Collabora) going out of our way to have PiTiVi shipped by default. And nothing’s engraved in stone at this point. If we (pitivi development team) get feedback/help on improving what’s bothering people by the Lucid release date and people deem it good enough to be shipped by default, great ! If we get no help… well.. PiTiVi won’t die and people will still be able to use it via PPAs.



(The “pushing” quote came from the blueprint on launchpad and from the meeting at USD09. The quote has since changed on the blueprint to a less aggressive sounding one.) 

RE: Why ship PiTiVi as default app and not another video editor
I’d say the main reason is that all the dependencies (except for goocanvas, which is pretty slim) are already shipped by default : GStreamer, GTK, python. All the other editors would require bringing in more dependencies. I’ll let Canonical/Ubuntu confirm that or not.

RE: lack of features …
On this part we have always taken the stand of making sure features are as solid as possible before adding new features. In terms of video editing, that means you do need to have input/output format support rock solid, trimming/cutting rock solid. Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/… out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don’t.



The two features we find critically missing are : video transitions and overlaying. I just merged yesterday the videomixing branch yesterday to master which enables setting transparency on every video streams (like Sony Vegas does). It still has some issues, but having it in master will force/speedup the bugfixing process.


Video effects are not a top-priority. Getting those… without being able to do the features above are pointless. We won’t diverge from that point of view. Helping us get the above rock solid as fast as possible … will mean you will see video effects faster.

To people throwing generic rants about sucking
Write a video editor (or any non-trivial multimedia applicatoin), then come back and rant about other people’s application sucking. Then we might have a proper discussion. In the meantime… you’re not improving the situation.



(This is a bit hyperbolic. Users have a right to have opinions on software, particularly software that may be part-and-parcel of promoting Ubuntu to new users. Everybody’s opinion is valid – even if it is misinformed.)

PiTiVi is dead or no longer maintained
The 3 main developers (who also happen to be hired by Collabora and that includes myself) have been working on some other company work in the meantime. Keeping Collabora hiring those 3 developers, means ensuring they have time to be paid to work on it also. (I’d personnaly love to have people working 100% of the time on PiTiVi … but you need to take into account the reality of running a business).



We’re progressively getting more company time for PiTiVi (Brandon has been back on it full time for the past frew weeks for example). It’s far from being abandoned/dead, just that we do it at our own pace. It’s freely available (LGPL, no copryight attributions required) and will always stay that way. We always welcome contributions and are pretty fast to review/commit patches.

Drop in on #pitivi on irc.freenode.net or send us a mail on pitivi-pitivi@lists.sourceforget.net and come and give your feedback, what can be improved, what’s good and should be kept and … who knows … be part of the pitivi team :)

Edward Hervey: PiTiVi creator/maintainer, GStreamer hacker, Collabora Multimedia co-director

Related posts:

  1. PiTiVi On Course To Become A Default Application In Lucid
  2. PiTiVi 0.13.2 Released To The Wild
  3. PiTiVi 0.31.1 Released; Transitions, Effects Coming In July
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • John

    No idea who was firing insults in your direction d0od, but just wanted to say that this is a gem of a website.

    Keep up the good work.

    • Anonymous

      +1
      Keep up the good work.
      There are far more people who admire your work who stay silent than those few who are insulting you.

    • http://www.softsaurus.org/ softsaurus

      +1
      This site is great, frequently updated and very well written.
      And also ad free.. people should stop whining and just be thankful for your hard work.
      I know I am, keep it up!

      • daas88

        did you people even read it? noone insulted d0od, it was a response of one of pitivi developers in the pitivi or openshot thread, d0od just put his response where people could find it easily!

  • Anonymous

    Nice, coherent and well-balanced response. Kudos to Edward Hervey and thanks for his work. We need a stable FLOSS NLE in a bad, bad way, so it’s great to see them working on it.

  • http://ubuntuteen.blogspot.com/ Andrew

    Well done to both d0od for putting this comment up, by also to Edward for writing it in such a calm manner. This is how discussions in FOSS should be. The mono flame war an antithesis of this.

  • dennishojgaard

    I just wanna express my satisfaction with PIVITI. Yes there are some issues with the slow progress but i really prefer simple STABLE applications rather than complex advanced apps that crash a lot…
    Good work and good focus…

  • simone

    Thanks Edward Hervey for your work on PiTiVi and your patient explanations.
    Congratulations to d0od for the blog!

  • Ben

    Well, let’s hope that it being shipped by default in a major distro will get these guys some more development time.

  • steve

    I just don’t get where these decisions come from. Okay I might only use Gimp once in a while, so taking it out won’t be the end of the world, but I doubt if even 1 in 10000 users will ever launch this. However good or bad it is, its just disk bloat.

    • Anonymous

      Indeed I’ve used GIMP several times since I installed Karmic (letting aside all the times I’ve used it since 2003) yet I’ve not installed a video editor yet.

      And not yet for red eye removal, I’ve recently done things in GIMP that I consider trivial yet F-Spot can’t do.

      And still I’ve not installed a video editor yet. But we are missing the point of windows imitation here guys.

  • Greg

    This website is my favorite Ubuntu site.

    It is also one of the best Linux sites I read.

    Once you realize Chrome is the next step towards the Thought Police from 1984, and stop using it, your website might be one of the best I read on the Internet!

  • Anonymous

    “Check out how many clips/movies/documentaries/… out there and see how much of them make use of video effects, for how long, and how many don’t.”

    I couldn’t agree more! There was a gag on the Simpsons several years ago where Lisa was editing a video for Homer using “My First Video Editor”, and every transition was a “star wipe” :-D

    I think video editing in Linux will benefit most if both developers focus on perfecting the user experience, the “feel” of working quickly, yet with dead-on accuracy. Zoom in, zoom out, move a clip, trim a startpoint, tweak a dissolve, all lightning-fast, like the UI was an extension of your own mind. That’s what separates the best commercial audio and video editors from the also-rans, and IMO, focusing on that aspect in the open-source space will build unprecedented loyalty among users.

    Stepping down from my little soapbox, I want to say both of the editors being discussed have their merits, and that if there was any question, this site is awesome! d00d, you have an amazing site here, and the fact that impassioned discussions like this crop up from time to time is a good sign for the vitality of the community that’s grown around it.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t comment here much, but I really appreciate Edward Hervey coming to answer a few of the questions. Thanks, and I look forward to seeing a video editor shipped with Ubuntu by default in the future. :)

  • Anonymous

    I have tried several video editors on Ubuntu 9.10 and Pitivi is the only one that really works for me. High def videos preview without a stutter and it renders video very fast and extraordinarily well. I still use Vegas Pro on the jobs that demand it but am using Pitivi for everything it can handle. I love working in the Linux operating system. I’m looking forward to Pitivi growing richer and richer.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t seem to have ever successfully output a video file from Pitivi. If I try to render a file to seemingly any proprietary format (h.264/mpeg4 are the ones I’ve tried, with mp3 audio), I just get an error message about two seconds into the encode.

    If I try to use Vorbis/Theora, I don’t get an error message, but the second frame gets repeated endlessly and Pitivi reports that the encoding will take 4 hours (an hour per minute of video?)

    I’m sorry I haven’t filed a bug about this already, but I need to get some more spare time to get the latest version from your CVS and test if that works.

  • Ade

    I use Gimp, not much but I do. It not being included isn’t the end of the world and I can add it easily enough from the repos. The same goes for this really. I don’t understand where these conversations come into play. One one hand your saying remove gimp it takes up disc space, then on the other hand they are saying include this. I don’t see the point. I am much more in favour of the software center having an ‘editor’s picks’ sort of section. When I need an app I may often sort by popularity, it usually means it’s the best app for the job or at least the best supported. If the directions for installing new software is clearer then a lot of ‘space’ can be saved on the disc.

    All this is really boils down too is Ubuntu having the same application set as what comes with Windows 7. It may have basic video editing software included but can’t imagine it gets used all that much by the average joe bloggs user. Maybe we need a poll!!!

  • manny

    i Kill anyone insulting DooD!

    i luv openshot, but lets see what happens with pitivi id say add it and then lets see how many peeps complain (maybe they’ll really work hard at it). i know kdenlive will go in kubuntu

    anyway openshot has nothing to fear, people will always use it same as they are now. If it integrates better with gnome am sure a change might happen later on like with pidgin