OMG! CHROMEOS LIVE BLOG!

Google will, today, be showing off their initial version of Google Chrome OS. Here we inform you, live, of the updates and revelations regarding one of the most highly anticipated operating systems this millenium decade.

18.02: People are late, event will begin in a few minutes..
18:04: A slide on screen!

18:06: There will be NO BETA or release today.
18:06: The entire OS will be open sourced today.
18:07: Chrome is the reason behind ChromeOS; to help push the web forward.

18:07: 40 million regular users of Google Chrome browser.
18:08: Talking about how much faster Chrome is over IE; 40%; focused on end-to-end speed – from startup as well as javascript.
18:09: Chrome been updated over 20 times; users aren’t even aware!
18:09: Focus on HTML 5
18:09 3 more announcements coming this year: Chrome for LINUX, MAC and EXTENSIONS launch.

18:10: HTML5;Working on making webapps using system recourse such as graphics; want games in the browser to be able to use GPU, multi-cores.

18:12: Working on making webapps work offline.
18:13: Exciting trends in computer industry: -

18:13: Netbooks incredibly popular; most people have important data stored in the cloud; webapps most successful platform so far;
18:14: Phones becoming like computers, computers becoming like phones = convergence = new model of computing.
18:15 Better model of computing = Chrome OS.
18:15: ChromeOS to be super fast, boot should be just like switching a TV on! Chrome will be even faster on Chrome OS than any other OS.

18:16: All apps to be WEB APPS. NO desktop applications. No binaries.
18:17:  All data to be stored in the cloud… GDrive?
18:18: Security: Due to no binaries or desktop apps mean Google knows everything that runs; no malicious code can run out side the browser.
18: 19 – Demo. A 7 SECOND BOOT! Will be even quicker in final release.

18:20: Desktop: -

18:21: App Menu

18:22: Apps open in “persistant windows”

18:25 – Aim to play movies, music, books, etc.
18:27: It has “workspaces”; i.e. another chrome window with different tabs open

18:27: File browser is also in Chrome; documents launch in online apps; they demo and Excel document opening in Microsoft OfficeOnline

18:29: Example: Camera files just open in “panels”

18:29: Demo’s clicking on a PDF file; opens instantly in the browser.

18:30: Some dude who’s name I just missed is talking about under the hood and design documents

18:31: Only works on SSDs!
18:32: Talking about why current OS’s are slow;

18:33: how to “fix” security isues IF they arise; ChromeOS uses a “verified boot” – checks that you’re running what you should be running;

18:35: System automatically repairs itself using “re-imaging”. ChromeOS re-imaging SAVES all cache data and settings.
18:36: App security;Current OSes security model are 20 years old.

18:37: Security sandbox protects system and files from webapps;
18:38: Root partition is read-only.

18:39: ALL data encrypted on the user data partition; all synced back to the cloud as well. (Bookmarks, wallpapers, wifi settings). Whatever machine you use – it’s your OS.

18:40: Hands back to the, er, other guy who’s name i didn’t catch.

18:41: Brief overview of ChromeOS in the market next year.
18:42: ChromeOS will be REFERENCED with manufacturers.
18:43: Will get specify hardware for use with Chrome OS; won’t work with hard-drives or certain wifi cards, etc.
18:44: Netbooks have issues; Google will work with manufacturers to make bigger screens, full sized keyboards…
18:45: Google thank Ubuntu, webkit, Linux Kernel… :D  Will be sending changes back upstream.
18:46: ChromeOS can work today – but you’ll need the right netbook!
18:46: 3 Minute video being demo’d.

18:49: Q&A Time!

Q&A’s paraphrased by me.

Q “What is the target audience? Can you run Android apps on it? A chance of a ChromeOS Server?”
A  Many interesting possibilities; Across Android there are large innovations – all opensource, all involve the community, we will go through a paradigm shift in computing;

Q: “If you’re specifying hardware components you should know what they’ll cost?! Price target?”
A: “Price ranges will what people are used to in the netbook category. No price target.

Q: “What netbook did you use for the demo?”
A: “Off the shelf EeePC.”

Q: “How do manufacturers ‘apply’ to be part of ChromeOS?”
A “We have a lot of documentation on our website. We’ve been reaching out, for most partners most info is out.”

Q: “Application store? Driver certification? Editing applications for photos or videos?”
A: “A lot more details to be announced. Main focus on web applications and help people to discover them.
Working with manufacturers on drivers, using open source drivers where possible. Testing plan in place.

There are apps currently not available on the web but this OS is for a device whereby you mainly use it online. There are a few user cases that they’re trying to fit; there are already webapps online to allow edit.”

Q: “Codec support?”
A: “Already have Flash, HTML5. Native Client and working on codec hardware acceleration through the browser. What you see in ChromeOS WILL make it into Chrome as well.”


Q: “Will there be Silverlight support?”
A: “To  be announced.”

Q: “Will multiple browser run on ChromeOS?”
A: “No. The code is available so if another browser can take it and make their own OS. Chrome is the operating system, other browsers can’t replace it.”

Q: “Is ChromeOS only going to run on netbooks?”
A: “Initially only focused on Netbook to deliver best experience possible.In the future want it to run on desktops, laptops, etc.”


Q: “How big is ChromeOS (filesize)?”
A: “Currently lots in the code because it’s in development. Aim is to have a simplified code-stack.”

Q: “Offline access provided by gears?”
A: “Primarily for use online, but you can “cache” online media locally. HTML5 capability also allows for local storage.”

Q: “Virtualisation; Can it be run in a virtual machine?”
A: “Currently, yes. That’s how we currently use it.”

Q: “Android Apps on Chrome?”
A: “Pushing webapps; HTML5, Native Client. Android apps, as of today, won’t run on ChromeOS.”

Q: “Are you saying flat out that no third-party apps or Android apps will ever run on ChromeOS?”
A: “Currently they won’t work. Webapps are our focus, we’re working hard on webapps.”

Q: “Will ChromeOS work on Arm or x86?”
A: “Chrome will function on both, and Native Client is currently being worked on for ARM. We will make sure there is a way [by release] that the same functionality is delivered on both.”

Sergey Brin has dropped in!

Q: “Android Apps!!!!????”
A: “Focused on webapps.”

Q: “Dell has instant-on OSes. Do you have plans to be a second-os like these?”
A: “No. We’re focused on being a core OS; making a mean netbook that runs the OS as best as possible.”

Q: “Printers… flip-cams… etc. How will it handle this?”
A: “Storage devices (camera’s, phones, iPods, etc) will work. ChomeOS WILL print, but that will announced next year…”

Q: “Chrome involved the community, ChromeOS will involved the community; how do you hope the community blooms around ChromeOS ? 
A: “We’re serious about upstream and downstreaming; the vendor side is exciting as it will help get this running on their OS.”

Q: “What about real-time notifications on every page?”
A: “[Sergey] Work is needed. Need to introduce this into the browser..”
A: “W33C Notification API will be a big part of ChromeOS.”

Q: “What is ChromeOS’s strategic position? now you’re going head-tohead Microsoft, etc.”
A: “Call us dumb businessmen, but we’re focused on users need; there is a need to use computers easily. Netbooks are cheap but managing the software on them would be high; the web platform is easier and can perform just as well.”

Et Fin.

Conclusion

Now the session is over and the source has been released it is up to developers to fully shape this OS. What we saw today was an initial build; an early step out of the comfort of user case studies and  and into the big brash world of user expectation, practical realities and the baited breath of the press.

It is too early to tell whether Google ChromeOS will succeed or fail, what we have gathered from this “pre-launch launch” is that Google are doing their best to give it every chance at succeeding by open-sourcing it.  

One hour, one crazy operating system paradigm shift and one confused looking Sergey Brin later we’re left with a potential look at the future of consumer OSes….

You can grab the source code of Google ChromeOS @ http://src.chromium.org/

DISCLAIMER: 
This was typed live at speed with the event. As such grammar and spelling had to take a back seat so please don’t bemoan any typos, etc. 

Related posts:

  1. ChromeOS To Be Demoed In 2 Days Time…
  2. Google ChromeOS To Become Available Next Week (Apparently!)
  3. ChromeOS to be based on Debian
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.
  • http://pensieriacoriandoli.blogspot.com/ Giorg

    NO ONE will ever buy a chrome-os netbook and single-boot it.

    • Anonymous

      Actually i think it’s going to be quite a good netbook OS. And thats where the options stop. :P

      • http://pensieriacoriandoli.blogspot.com/ Giorg

        I could buy one only because it SHOULD be cheaper than a windows one. And I would be contributing to a linux-friendly company. But that’s it, with that os you’ve your hands tied.

  • http://seifsallam.co.cc/ Seif Sallam

    in Google’s eye, no one should have data on the client side, everything should be on the cloud. so the OS is nothing more than a browser. but wait how can i play my music?

    • Anonymous

      And how do I play my music when I don’t have a LAN connection? LOL
      Too true. I don’t know what they’re going to do about this. Eventually, Joe User likes to have his Music/Pictures/Videos on HIS computer, not only in the cloud. And what about ripped DVD’s? A good DVD rip size for me is like 1.2 GB. Unless I’m on 2MPBS+, it’s unworkable.

      • http://omgubuntu.co.uk/ d0od

        Everything you store on your computer is stored in the cloud. So if you keep your dvd’s ripped on your HD’s (really, on a netbook?) then, from what i gathered, this will be synced up as well. Everything in the cloud will be on your storage, too.

        As for music and movies, it was addressed: ChromeOS will play movies and music without a connection. Either by caching and storing online streams offline, or my playing your files.

        • Ben

          Don’t know about everywhere else, but where I’m from, you can’t be pushing packets all the time without thinking about it.

          If I have a decent music collection (the one of my compy kind of sucks, and is currently sitting at a little over 4Gb) that’s a lot of data. For most affordable wireless plans, that’s the month (and yeah, a lot of them count uploads).

          I’m sure this will be done intelligently, so only changes are synced, but still, every file? That kind of bumps this down from “really useful, portable computer with great battery life that I can do a lot of my work on whenever I feel like” to “portable computer with great battery life that I can use to work on a small selection of pretty small files”.

          When I get a netbook, I’m going to want some videos and music with me (not a great many, but enough to keep me entertained on the two hour train ride to my friend’s party). It seems that ChromeOS will not really work for that.

          Of course, don’t target me, but am I alone in this?

      • http://seifsallam.co.cc/ Seif Sallam

        they can use Gears to make applications available, but i think music application more likely to be through extensions. anyway i agree that its too early and there is a lot of situation to talk about, and its hard to accept this as Google is destroying the concept of regular OS, and maybe there are a lot of people comfortable using a regular OS.for me i think Chrome OS will take the lead from Microsoft Windows as Windows is made for average Joe, and the layer of Linux and Mac will hold for a while 5-10 years till web application become more mature.

    • John

      Native spotify browser-app!

    • manny

      Ok the bold thing here is that google plans to be the “main” OS from the start:

      it’s indeed bold, they should work on being THE BEST complementary OS and work from there to become a main OS (when webapps are much more mainstream).

      really they should aim to be included on ALL windows PCs

      heck i want to run both Ubuntu and chrome OS natively (when am on the go chrome and when am developing or testing local apps: Ubuntu)

      of course being so bold will get them lots of followers in the start. So maybe it’s a strategy (bold announcement) :)

      >”Q: “Dell has instant-on OSes. Do you have plans to be a second-os like these?”
      >A: “No. We’re focused on being a core OS; making a mean netbook that runs the OS as best as possible.”"

  • http://pensieriacoriandoli.blogspot.com/ Giorg

    “Netbooks have issues; Google will work with manufacturers to make bigger screens, full sized keyboards…” goggle seems to want notebooks.

    • Anonymous

      LOL. “Google will work with laptop manufacturers to make the keyboard and the screen separate parts.” Desktops anyone? HAHA

      • http://omgubuntu.co.uk/ d0od

        That was evidently a typo. It’s hard trying to keep up AND type. It all moved so fast…

    • http://olympusdigitalpen.blogspot.com/ dr. watson

      wow, great point.

    • http://www.dennedy.org/ Dan Dennedy
    • Anonymous

      No they want to free netbooks from Windows.

  • http://itbcn8world.spaces.live.com itbcn8

    Ugh, this whole plan makes me crindge. EVERYTHING on the cloud. It’s like renting a house instead of buying. You don’t really own anything anymore. Internet down: sucks. And I don’t like how it looks like a web browser. I think Ubuntu has a much stronger appeal than this to consumers and power users.Question: If this didn’t have the “Google” logo… if it came to you from another company (still just as capable), would people be this excited about it?I think what we have here is fanboys running after the new shiny product. How about google fix Google Docs, Wave, Latitude, iGoogle, or any of their projects before trying to sell an OS?

    • Anonymous

      Nice point. I think cloud is cheap way for big corporations to take expensive informations from us.

  • giannis papadopoulos

    i think that google OS is the revenge of the linux in the netbooks!
    Just in time when everyone declared victory of microsoft in the netbook sector and the demise of linux,the google strikes back and send microsoft to dust.
    Well it seems that the desktop OS is a very different place and there is where ubuntu must concentrate its efforts.

  • http://olympusdigitalpen.blogspot.com/ dr. watson

    I think this is an interesting concept, but for some reason or another I think its going to fail. I have been in this industry for a long time and I just don’t see this taking off. Several problems arise with this OS.1) Keeping information in the Cloud. Encrypted or not, most people I know whether be it for business or personal use do not trust keeping information in the ‘cloud’. 2) Accessibility. In the U.S. broadband still isn’t everywhere and even when it is sometimes can be too slow.3) Web Apps – they have become sophisticated, but forms based applications still offer (in most cases) better functionality and a better GUI experience.4) Relying on the web. If the web is not accessible or a web server for a particular app is offline, etc then problems arise. The OS is web dependent whereas others OS are not. The system may boot faster than anything out there, but if I have to wait several minutes due to connectivity problems, etc than the speed of operation is a mute point.

    • http://omgubuntu.co.uk/ d0od

      This isn’t targeted as a mainstream OS.

      1. It’s not intended for business users and most people use webmail already thus they alreayd have data in the cloud.

      2. If people don’t have broadband, they’re likely not the target for this OS.

      3. Again this is designed to be an online OS, and webapps are what people in the target audience for this device use on this type of device. Who normally uses photoshop on a netbook anyway?!

      4. There is plenty of scope for offline capabilites, but again, this is designed as an OS for use Online. Netbooks are mostly companion devices that people use purely to use the web.

      • http://olympusdigitalpen.blogspot.com/ dr. watson

        I am trying to be excited about the concept as I always embrace new technologies, but I just don’t see this working. I am a big fan of Google products and use Gmail and other applications, but i honestly don’t think we are ready for a ‘cloud’ based OS – too many issues, too many concerns. I guess I am little let down as well, I was hoping Google was going to refine linux and give it some publicity. At the end of the day I just can’t help but to feel that this has nothing to do with delivering a better experience for the user as much is it is about pushing people to be dependent on their products and when media outlets start reporting on this OS we probably won’t even hear the word ‘linux’ mentioned – just ‘google’. I hope I am wrong.

  • thenewguy

    This seems like nothing more than tying my own hands. There is nothing offered here that I can’t do now with Ubuntu or anything else for that matter. Anywhere there isn’t perfectly dependable fast web access your just waiting to have a meeting or whatever smashed by not being able to get to your notes/presentation/whatever. There is way to much trust involved. Can it even use flash drives or other hard(er) storage mediums? Might make a cute toy, but no way I could get comfortable with it!

  • https://launchpad.net/~omegamormegil Omegamormegil

    Fantastic post, thanks.

  • Mohan

    I liked what I saw, but would sure like to see more of it, which I take will happen next year.

  • http://odysseus.wordpress.com/ Jack

    The only thing I can think of is iTunes. That is one app that would be a kill-joy. Unless, of course, Apple works with Google to make a web-based iTunes app. If that was the case, the ALL systems could use it (aka, every other OS). But I don’t really see Apple doing that. They might, but I doubt it. They will treat this like any other Linux OS. They won’t support it. Therefore, as soon as people here that they won’t be able to purchase and sync the iPods/iPhones with it, they will buy another computer.

  • Alan

    WOW nice… Is a complete different concept for a netbook but i think it suits them. After all, a netbook isn’t supposed to replace a desktop computer, and if it isn’t with internet then what is the use of a netbook?

    Sorry for my bad english.

  • http://sharkbaitbobby.blogspot.com/ sharkbait

    Is the video of this available?
    Edit: Yes, yes it is.
    http://investor.shareholder.com/googpr/eventdetail.cfm?eventid=75092

  • Joko Gendeng

    Netbook is for cloud use. So for me, ChromeOS is really great. With 7 seconds boot, it will be like bringing hardcopy book in our bag (remember, netbook is small). After boooting, you can do everything a netbook meant to be made.

  • Ben

    I think I will be giving this one a skip, although I’ll keep an eye on it.

    A netbook doesn’t have to be merely a gateway to the Internet, and I don’t see why it should be. It’s still a fairly capable machine, and here you’re making it a browser. Brilliant.

    I agree that a different paradigm is needed, and one that’s closely tied to the net makes sense, but not one completely reliant on it. A system shouldn’t be useless the second it loses its connection.

    The upside of this is that Chrome will benefit, so I’m glad it exists, and hey, maybe I’ll be proven wrong. I do think this is kind of extreme for an OS, though.

  • Anonymous

    I think I’ll be giving this a swerve, in terms of an OS that stores data in the cloud it wouldn’t be something I’d want.