Comments on: PDfmod – Simple, Easy PDF Editor http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pdfmod-%25e2%2580%2593-simple-easy-pdf-editor Everything Ubuntu. Daily. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Tomhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-2169 Tom Sun, 04 Oct 2009 22:51:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-2169 If you don't want to install an app to editor your PDF files, I'd recommend <a href="http://www.pdfescape.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdfescape.com</a> If you don’t want to install an app to editor your PDF files, I’d recommend http://www.pdfescape.com

]]> By: d0odhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1921 d0od Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:12:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1921 I'm only giving the official instructions from the install file so don't hate me! I’m only giving the official instructions from the install file so don’t hate me!

]]> By: AWhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1915 AW Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:55:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1915 Man, that is *ATROCIOUS*.Mono supports XCopy deployment, so the fact that you need to do the ./configure / make / make install dance is ridiculous. Man, that is *ATROCIOUS*.

Mono supports XCopy deployment, so the fact that you need to do the ./configure / make / make install dance is ridiculous.

]]> By: Anonymoushttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1891 Anonymous Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:46:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1891 Thanks for the mono warning thingy.Mono might be better than Java, but frankly, lots of languages are better than Java. Thanks for the mono warning thingy.

Mono might be better than Java, but frankly, lots of languages are better than Java.

]]> By: HarshDhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1888 HarshD Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:38:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1888 "when applications start to cater more towards a Windows version and end up having to leave features out of the Linux version because it would require a bit more effort"Which applications are you referring to? I think Monos pretty decent, but I don't know of any mono application that has actually been a success as a .Net application. Even the Banshee port hasn't seen the light of day. “when applications start to cater more towards a Windows version and end up having to leave features out of the Linux version because it would require a bit more effort”

Which applications are you referring to? I think Monos pretty decent, but I don’t know of any mono application that has actually been a success as a .Net application. Even the Banshee port hasn’t seen the light of day.

]]> By: d0odhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1882 d0od Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:16:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1882 I have to agree (somewhat.)My only pet peeve is when applications) start to cater more towards a Windows version and end up having to leave features out of the Linux version because it would require a bit more effort. If it was a Windows port to Linux - fair enough, but when an application starts in Linux and gets a windows port and then jumps ship... hmm...(There is an example, but i dare not incurr the wrath of fanbois) I have to agree (somewhat.)

My only pet peeve is when applications) start to cater more towards a Windows version and end up having to leave features out of the Linux version because it would require a bit more effort. If it was a Windows port to Linux – fair enough, but when an application starts in Linux and gets a windows port and then jumps ship… hmm…

(There is an example, but i dare not incurr the wrath of fanbois)

]]> By: d0odhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1881 d0od Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:14:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1881 It will normally be at the top, however it'd be weird starting an article on an application with a blurb about a new banner i'm introducing. It will normally be at the top, however it’d be weird starting an article on an application with a blurb about a new banner i’m introducing.

]]> By: Seif Sallamhttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1878 Seif Sallam Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:52:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1878 why all that problem with mono, i hate mircrosoft but c# is well designed language, its performance is better than Java, and cross-platform so Open-Source applications can rise in different platforms, and all C# applications that i used till now work perfect. sure its performace isn't as fast as c++, but its easier to develop and fix. why all that problem with mono, i hate mircrosoft but c# is well designed language, its performance is better than Java, and cross-platform so Open-Source applications can rise in different platforms, and all C# applications that i used till now work perfect. sure its performace isn’t as fast as c++, but its easier to develop and fix.

]]> By: Namehttp://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1876 Name Mon, 28 Sep 2009 06:19:00 +0000 http://www.omgubuntu.dreamhosters.com/2009/09/pdfmod-%e2%80%93-simple-easy-pdf-editor/#comment-1876 I think the mono banner should be more at the top of the page so people who are opposed to it don't spend time reading about the app, only to find out it requires mono to run. I think the mono banner should be more at the top of the page so people who are opposed to it don’t spend time reading about the app, only to find out it requires mono to run.

]]>